Suppr超能文献

作为个体特质来衡量对奖励的注意力:价值驱动注意力问卷(VDAQ)。

Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ).

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-4235, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2020 Nov;84(8):2122-2137. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01212-3. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

Abstract

Reward history is a powerful determinant of what we pay attention to. This influence of reward on attention varies substantially across individuals, being related to a variety of personality variables and clinical conditions. Currently, the ability to measure and quantify attention-to-reward is restricted to the use of psychophysical laboratory tasks, which limits research into the construct in a variety of ways. In the present study, we introduce a questionnaire designed to provide a brief and accessible means of assessing attention-to-reward. Scores on the questionnaire correlate with other measures known to be related to attention-to-reward and predict performance on multiple laboratory tasks measuring the construct. In demonstrating this relationship, we also provide evidence that attention-to-reward as measured in the lab, an automatic and implicit bias in information processing, is related to overt behaviors and motivations in everyday life as assessed via the questionnaire. Variation in scores on the questionnaire is additionally associated with a distinct biomarker in brain connectivity, and the questionnaire exhibits acceptable test-retest reliability. Overall, the Value-Driven Attention Questionnaire (VDAQ) provides a useful proxy-measure of attention-to-reward that is much more accessible than typical laboratory assessments.

摘要

奖励历史是我们注意力的重要决定因素。这种奖励对注意力的影响在个体之间有很大的差异,与各种人格变量和临床状况有关。目前,衡量和量化注意力与奖励之间关系的能力仅限于使用心理物理实验室任务,这以多种方式限制了对该结构的研究。在本研究中,我们引入了一种问卷,旨在提供一种简单易用的方法来评估注意力与奖励之间的关系。问卷的得分与已知与注意力与奖励相关的其他衡量标准相关,并预测了多项实验室任务的表现,这些任务衡量了这一结构。在证明这种关系的过程中,我们还提供了证据表明,实验室中测量的注意力与奖励,即信息处理中的自动和隐性偏见,与通过问卷评估的日常生活中的外显行为和动机有关。问卷得分的变化还与大脑连通性的一个独特生物标志物相关,且问卷具有可接受的重测信度。总的来说,价值驱动注意力问卷(VDAQ)提供了一种有用的注意力与奖励的替代衡量标准,比典型的实验室评估更容易获得。

相似文献

6
Neural correlates of gender differences in distractibility by sexual stimuli.性刺激引起分心的性别差异的神经相关性。
Neuroimage. 2018 Aug 1;176:499-509. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.072. Epub 2018 May 2.
7
Test-retest reliability of value-driven attentional capture.价值驱动注意捕获的重测信度。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):720-726. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1079-7.

引用本文的文献

5
The past, present, and future of selection history.选择史的过去、现在和未来。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Nov;130:326-350. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
6
Awareness is necessary for attentional biases by location-reward association.位置-奖励关联的注意偏差需要意识。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jul;83(5):2002-2016. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02280-7. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
7
Relating value-driven attention to psychopathology.将价值驱动的注意力与精神病理学联系起来。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Jun;39:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

1
On the automaticity of attentional orienting to threatening stimuli.注意指向威胁性刺激的自动性。
Emotion. 2020 Sep;20(6):1109-1112. doi: 10.1037/emo0000596. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
4
Neural evidence for automatic value-modulated approach behaviour.自动价值调制趋近行为的神经证据。
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.050. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
5
Neurobiology of value-driven attention.价值驱动注意的神经生物学。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
6
Test-retest reliability of value-driven attentional capture.价值驱动注意捕获的重测信度。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):720-726. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1079-7.
7
Mechanisms of value-learning in the guidance of spatial attention.价值学习机制在空间注意引导中的作用。
Cognition. 2018 Sep;178:26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验