• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用推特数据改进 2016 年美国寨卡病毒疫情监测

Use of Twitter data to improve Zika virus surveillance in the United States during the 2016 epidemic.

机构信息

Program in Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Uniersity of California, Irvine, California, USA.

Department of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):761. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7103-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-019-7103-8
PMID:31200692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6570872/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Zika virus (ZIKV) is an emerging mosquito-borne arbovirus that can produce serious public health consequences. In 2016, ZIKV caused an epidemic in many countries around the world, including the United States. ZIKV surveillance and vector control is essential to combating future epidemics. However, challenges relating to the timely publication of case reports significantly limit the effectiveness of current surveillance methods. In many countries with poor infrastructure, established systems for case reporting often do not exist. Previous studies investigating the H1N1 pandemic, general influenza and the recent Ebola outbreak have demonstrated that time- and geo-tagged Twitter data, which is immediately available, can be utilized to overcome these limitations.

METHODS

In this study, we employed a recently developed system called Cloudberry to filter a random sample of Twitter data to investigate the feasibility of using such data for ZIKV epidemic tracking on a national and state (Florida) level. Two auto-regressive models were calibrated using weekly ZIKV case counts and zika tweets in order to estimate weekly ZIKV cases 1 week in advance.

RESULTS

While models tended to over-predict at low case counts and under-predict at extreme high counts, a comparison of predicted versus observed weekly ZIKV case counts following model calibration demonstrated overall reasonable predictive accuracy, with an R of 0.74 for the Florida model and 0.70 for the U.S.

MODEL

Time-series analysis of predicted and observed ZIKV cases following internal cross-validation exhibited very similar patterns, demonstrating reasonable model performance. Spatially, the distribution of cumulative ZIKV case counts (local- & travel-related) and zika tweets across all 50 U.S. states showed a high correlation (r = 0.73) after adjusting for population.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the value of utilizing Twitter data for the purposes of disease surveillance. This is of high value to epidemiologist and public health officials charged with protecting the public during future outbreaks.

摘要

背景

寨卡病毒(ZIKV)是一种新出现的蚊媒病毒,可造成严重的公共卫生后果。2016 年,ZIKV 在世界许多国家引发了疫情,包括美国。寨卡病毒监测和病媒控制对于应对未来的疫情至关重要。然而,与及时发布病例报告相关的挑战极大地限制了当前监测方法的有效性。在基础设施较差的许多国家,通常不存在建立的病例报告系统。先前针对 H1N1 大流行、普通流感和最近的埃博拉疫情的研究表明,可利用时间和地理标记的 Twitter 数据来克服这些限制,这些数据是立即可用的。

方法

在本研究中,我们使用了一种名为 Cloudberry 的新系统,对随机抽取的 Twitter 数据进行过滤,以调查在全国和州(佛罗里达州)一级使用此类数据进行寨卡病毒流行跟踪的可行性。使用每周寨卡病毒病例数和寨卡病毒推文对数个自回归模型进行了校准,以便提前一周估计每周寨卡病毒病例数。

结果

虽然模型往往在低病例数时过高预测,在极高病例数时过低预测,但在模型校准后,对预测与观察到的每周寨卡病毒病例数进行比较,结果表明整体预测准确率较高,佛罗里达州模型的 R 值为 0.74,美国模型的 R 值为 0.70。

模型

内部交叉验证后对预测和观察到的寨卡病毒病例进行时间序列分析,结果显示出相似的模式,表明模型性能良好。从空间上看,在对人口进行调整后,全美 50 个州的累积寨卡病毒病例数(本地和旅行相关)和寨卡病毒推文的分布高度相关(r=0.73)。

结论

本研究证明了利用 Twitter 数据进行疾病监测的价值。这对于负责在未来疫情期间保护公众的流行病学家和公共卫生官员具有很高的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/1571d1581701/12889_2019_7103_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/ef43ad45f941/12889_2019_7103_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/afbce2e65633/12889_2019_7103_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/cb5b938f72af/12889_2019_7103_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/ec42b500dc35/12889_2019_7103_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/74150d9a521a/12889_2019_7103_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/72373f7c1bc4/12889_2019_7103_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/1571d1581701/12889_2019_7103_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/ef43ad45f941/12889_2019_7103_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/afbce2e65633/12889_2019_7103_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/cb5b938f72af/12889_2019_7103_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/ec42b500dc35/12889_2019_7103_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/74150d9a521a/12889_2019_7103_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/72373f7c1bc4/12889_2019_7103_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05cf/6570872/1571d1581701/12889_2019_7103_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of Twitter data to improve Zika virus surveillance in the United States during the 2016 epidemic.利用推特数据改进 2016 年美国寨卡病毒疫情监测
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):761. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7103-8.
2
Forecasting Zika Incidence in the 2016 Latin America Outbreak Combining Traditional Disease Surveillance with Search, Social Media, and News Report Data.结合传统疾病监测与搜索、社交媒体及新闻报道数据预测2016年拉丁美洲寨卡疫情的发病率
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jan 13;11(1):e0005295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005295. eCollection 2017 Jan.
3
Quantifying the risk of local Zika virus transmission in the contiguous US during the 2015-2016 ZIKV epidemic.量化 2015-2016 年寨卡病毒疫情期间美国本土寨卡病毒传播的局部风险。
BMC Med. 2018 Oct 18;16(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1185-5.
4
Dynamic Forecasting of Zika Epidemics Using Google Trends.利用谷歌趋势对寨卡疫情进行动态预测
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):e0165085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165085. eCollection 2017.
5
Mapping the cryptic spread of the 2015-2016 global Zika virus epidemic.绘制 2015-2016 年全球 Zika 病毒疫情的神秘传播图谱。
BMC Med. 2020 Dec 17;18(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01845-x.
6
A systematic review and evaluation of Zika virus forecasting and prediction research during a public health emergency of international concern. Zika 病毒在国际关注的突发公共卫生事件期间的预测和预报研究的系统评价和评估。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Oct 4;13(10):e0007451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007451. eCollection 2019 Oct.
7
Projecting the end of the Zika virus epidemic in Latin America: a modelling analysis.预测拉丁美洲寨卡病毒疫情的结束:建模分析。
BMC Med. 2018 Oct 3;16(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1158-8.
8
Elevation as a proxy for mosquito-borne Zika virus transmission in the Americas.海拔高度作为美洲蚊媒传播寨卡病毒的一个替代指标。
PLoS One. 2017 May 24;12(5):e0178211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178211. eCollection 2017.
9
Environmental and social determinants of population vulnerability to Zika virus emergence at the local scale.环境和社会因素对地方尺度人口易感染寨卡病毒的影响。
Parasit Vectors. 2018 May 8;11(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2867-8.
10
Simple framework for real-time forecast in a data-limited situation: the Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreaks in Brazil from 2015 to 2016 as an example.简单的实时预测框架:以 2015 年至 2016 年巴西寨卡病毒(ZIKV)疫情爆发为例。
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Jul 12;12(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3602-9.

引用本文的文献

1
When Infodemic Meets Epidemic: Systematic Literature Review.当信息疫情遇上疫情:系统文献综述
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Feb 3;11:e55642. doi: 10.2196/55642.
2
Use of Digital Tools in Arbovirus Surveillance: Scoping Review.数字工具在虫媒病毒监测中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 18;26:e57476. doi: 10.2196/57476.
3
Sexual and Gender-Diverse Individuals Face More Health Challenges during COVID-19: A Large-Scale Social Media Analysis with Natural Language Processing.性取向和性别多样化的个体在新冠疫情期间面临更多健康挑战:一项运用自然语言处理技术的大规模社交媒体分析

本文引用的文献

1
What Are People Tweeting About Zika? An Exploratory Study Concerning Its Symptoms, Treatment, Transmission, and Prevention.人们在推特上热议寨卡病毒的哪些方面?一项关于其症状、治疗、传播及预防的探索性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Jun 19;3(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.7157.
2
Zika in Twitter: Temporal Variations of Locations, Actors, and Concepts.推特上的寨卡病毒:地点、行为主体及概念的时间变化
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Apr 20;3(2):e22. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.6925.
3
Forecasting Zika Incidence in the 2016 Latin America Outbreak Combining Traditional Disease Surveillance with Search, Social Media, and News Report Data.
Health Data Sci. 2024 Sep 6;4:0127. doi: 10.34133/hds.0127. eCollection 2024.
4
Estimating the household secondary attack rate and serial interval of COVID-19 using social media.利用社交媒体估算新冠病毒病的家庭二代发病率和传播间隔
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jul 20;7(1):194. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01160-2.
5
Comparison of Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) incidence data from the novel LeCellPHIA participatory surveillance system with COVID-19 case count data, Lesotho, July 2020 - July 2021.2020年7月至2021年7月,莱索托新型LeCellPHIA参与式监测系统的流感样疾病(ILI)发病率数据与新冠肺炎病例计数数据的比较。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 16;23(1):688. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08664-4.
6
Using Social Media to Help Understand Patient-Reported Health Outcomes of Post-COVID-19 Condition: Natural Language Processing Approach.利用社交媒体帮助了解新冠后症状患者报告的健康结果:自然语言处理方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 19;25:e45767. doi: 10.2196/45767.
7
Exploring public sentiment and vaccination uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in England: a spatiotemporal and sociodemographic analysis of Twitter data.探究英格兰民众对 COVID-19 疫苗的情绪和接种情况:基于 Twitter 数据的时空和社会人口学分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 17;11:1193750. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1193750. eCollection 2023.
8
Open-Source Intelligence for Detection of Radiological Events and Syndromes Following the Invasion of Ukraine in 2022: Observational Study.2022年乌克兰冲突后利用开源情报检测放射事件和综合征:观察性研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Jun 28;3:e39895. doi: 10.2196/39895.
9
Investigating Deep Stock Market Forecasting with Sentiment Analysis.运用情感分析研究深度股票市场预测
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jan 23;25(2):219. doi: 10.3390/e25020219.
10
Can the Content of Social Networks Explain Epidemic Outbreaks?社交网络的内容能否解释流行病爆发?
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2023;42(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s11113-023-09753-7. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
结合传统疾病监测与搜索、社交媒体及新闻报道数据预测2016年拉丁美洲寨卡疫情的发病率
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jan 13;11(1):e0005295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005295. eCollection 2017 Jan.
4
Dynamic Forecasting of Zika Epidemics Using Google Trends.利用谷歌趋势对寨卡疫情进行动态预测
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):e0165085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165085. eCollection 2017.
5
Zika vaccine trials.寨卡疫苗试验。
Science. 2016 Sep 9;353(6304):1094-5. doi: 10.1126/science.aai8126.
6
How people react to Zika virus outbreaks on Twitter? A computational content analysis.人们在推特上如何应对寨卡病毒爆发?一项计算内容分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Dec 1;44(12):1700-1702. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.04.253. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
7
Ebola virus disease and social media: A systematic review.埃博拉病毒病与社交媒体:一项系统综述
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Dec 1;44(12):1660-1671. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
8
Surveillance Tools Emerging From Search Engines and Social Media Data for Determining Eye Disease Patterns.从搜索引擎和社交媒体数据中涌现的用于确定眼病模式的监测工具。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep 1;134(9):1024-30. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.2267.
9
Estimating Influenza Outbreaks Using Both Search Engine Query Data and Social Media Data in South Korea.利用搜索引擎查询数据和社交媒体数据估算韩国的流感疫情
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 4;18(7):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4955.
10
Assessing Seasonal Risks for the Introduction and Mosquito-borne Spread of Zika Virus in Europe.评估寨卡病毒在欧洲的引入和蚊媒传播的季节性风险。
EBioMedicine. 2016 Jul;9:250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 10.