• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态治疗方案G估计的模型选择

Model selection for G-estimation of dynamic treatment regimes.

作者信息

Wallace Michael P, Moodie Erica E M, Stephens David A

机构信息

Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2019 Dec;75(4):1205-1215. doi: 10.1111/biom.13104. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1111/biom.13104
PMID:31222720
Abstract

Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) aim to formalize personalized medicine by tailoring treatment decisions to individual patient characteristics. G-estimation for DTR identification targets the parameters of a structural nested mean model, known as the blip function, from which the optimal DTR is derived. Despite its potential, G-estimation has not seen widespread use in the literature, owing in part to its often complex presentation and implementation, but also due to the necessity for correct specification of the blip. Using a quadratic approximation approach inspired by iteratively reweighted least squares, we derive a quasi-likelihood function for G-estimation within the DTR framework, and show how it can be used to form an information criterion for blip model selection. We outline the theoretical properties of this model selection criterion and demonstrate its application in a variety of simulation studies as well as in data from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression study.

摘要

动态治疗方案(DTRs)旨在通过根据个体患者特征定制治疗决策,将个性化医疗形式化。用于DTR识别的G估计针对的是一个结构嵌套均值模型的参数,即所谓的“脉冲函数”,由此可推导出最优DTR。尽管G估计有其潜力,但在文献中尚未得到广泛应用,部分原因在于其表述和实施往往较为复杂,还因为需要正确设定脉冲函数。我们采用受迭代重加权最小二乘法启发的二次近似方法,在DTR框架内推导出用于G估计的拟似然函数,并展示如何用它来形成一个用于脉冲模型选择的信息准则。我们概述了该模型选择准则的理论性质,并在各种模拟研究以及“缓解抑郁症的序贯治疗替代方案”研究的数据中展示了其应用。

相似文献

1
Model selection for G-estimation of dynamic treatment regimes.动态治疗方案G估计的模型选择
Biometrics. 2019 Dec;75(4):1205-1215. doi: 10.1111/biom.13104. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
2
Model validation and selection for personalized medicine using dynamic-weighted ordinary least squares.使用动态加权普通最小二乘法进行个性化医疗的模型验证与选择
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Aug;26(4):1641-1653. doi: 10.1177/0962280217708665. Epub 2017 May 10.
3
Doubly-robust dynamic treatment regimen estimation via weighted least squares.通过加权最小二乘法进行双重稳健动态治疗方案估计。
Biometrics. 2015 Sep;71(3):636-44. doi: 10.1111/biom.12306. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
4
Variable selection in regression-based estimation of dynamic treatment regimes.基于回归的动态治疗方案估计中的变量选择。
Biometrics. 2023 Jun;79(2):988-999. doi: 10.1111/biom.13608. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
5
Bayesian inference for optimal dynamic treatment regimes in practice.贝叶斯推断在实践中最优动态治疗方案的应用。
Int J Biostat. 2023 May 17;19(2):309-331. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2022-0073. eCollection 2023 Nov 1.
6
Measurement error and precision medicine: Error-prone tailoring covariates in dynamic treatment regimes.测量误差与精准医学:动态治疗方案中易出错的协变量调整。
Stat Med. 2020 Nov 20;39(26):3732-3755. doi: 10.1002/sim.8690. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
7
Reward ignorant modeling of dynamic treatment regimes.奖励动态治疗方案的无知建模。
Biom J. 2018 Sep;60(5):991-1002. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700322. Epub 2018 May 30.
8
Model assessment in dynamic treatment regimen estimation via double robustness.通过双重稳健性进行动态治疗方案估计中的模型评估
Biometrics. 2016 Sep;72(3):855-64. doi: 10.1111/biom.12468. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
9
On optimal treatment regimes selection for mean survival time.关于平均生存时间的最优治疗方案选择
Stat Med. 2015 Mar 30;34(7):1169-84. doi: 10.1002/sim.6397. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
10
Adaptive contrast weighted learning for multi-stage multi-treatment decision-making.用于多阶段多治疗决策的自适应对比度加权学习
Biometrics. 2017 Mar;73(1):145-155. doi: 10.1111/biom.12539. Epub 2016 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Sparse 2-stage Bayesian meta-analysis for individualized treatments.用于个体化治疗的稀疏两阶段贝叶斯荟萃分析。
Biometrics. 2025 Jul 3;81(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujaf082.
2
Dynamic Treatment Regimes on Dyadic Networks.二元网络上的动态治疗方案
Stat Med. 2024 Dec 30;43(30):5944-5967. doi: 10.1002/sim.10278. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
3
Estimating dynamic treatment regimes for ordinal outcomes with household interference: Application in household smoking cessation.估计存在家庭干扰的有序结局的动态治疗方案:在家中戒烟中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Jun;33(6):981-995. doi: 10.1177/09622802241242313. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
Variable selection for individualised treatment rules with discrete outcomes.针对具有离散结果的个体化治疗规则进行变量选择。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2023 Nov 2;73(2):298-313. doi: 10.1093/jrsssc/qlad096. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Variable selection in high dimensions for discrete-outcome individualized treatment rules: Reducing severity of depression symptoms.高维离散结局个体化治疗规则中的变量选择:减轻抑郁症状严重程度。
Biostatistics. 2024 Jul 1;25(3):633-647. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxad022.
6
Variable selection in regression-based estimation of dynamic treatment regimes.基于回归的动态治疗方案估计中的变量选择。
Biometrics. 2023 Jun;79(2):988-999. doi: 10.1111/biom.13608. Epub 2021 Dec 18.