• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于个体化治疗的稀疏两阶段贝叶斯荟萃分析。

Sparse 2-stage Bayesian meta-analysis for individualized treatments.

作者信息

Shen Junwei, Moodie Erica E M, Golchi Shirin

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H3A 1G1, Canada.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2025 Jul 3;81(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujaf082.

DOI:10.1093/biomtc/ujaf082
PMID:40705493
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12288668/
Abstract

Individualized treatment rules tailor treatments to patients based on clinical, demographic, and other characteristics. Estimation of individualized treatment rules requires the identification of individuals who benefit most from the particular treatments and thus the detection of variability in treatment effects. To develop an effective individualized treatment rule, data from multisite studies may be required due to the low power provided by smaller datasets for detecting the often small treatment-covariate interactions. However, sharing of individual-level data is sometimes constrained. Furthermore, sparsity may arise in 2 senses: different data sites may recruit from different populations, making it infeasible to estimate identical models or all parameters of interest at all sites, and the number of non-zero parameters in the model for the treatment rule may be small. To address these issues, we adopt a 2-stage Bayesian meta-analysis approach to estimate individualized treatment rules which optimize expected patient outcomes using multisite data without disclosing individual-level data beyond the sites. Simulation results demonstrate that our approach can provide consistent estimates of the parameters which fully characterize the optimal individualized treatment rule. We estimate the optimal Warfarin dose strategy using data from the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium, where data sparsity and small treatment-covariate interaction effects pose additional statistical challenges.

摘要

个体化治疗规则根据临床、人口统计学和其他特征为患者量身定制治疗方案。估计个体化治疗规则需要识别出从特定治疗中获益最大的个体,从而检测治疗效果的变异性。为了制定有效的个体化治疗规则,由于较小数据集检测通常较小的治疗-协变量相互作用的能力较低,可能需要多中心研究的数据。然而,个体层面数据的共享有时会受到限制。此外,稀疏性可能在两个方面出现:不同的数据站点可能从不同的人群中招募,使得在所有站点估计相同的模型或所有感兴趣的参数变得不可行,并且治疗规则模型中的非零参数数量可能很少。为了解决这些问题,我们采用两阶段贝叶斯荟萃分析方法来估计个体化治疗规则,该方法使用多中心数据优化预期患者结局,而无需在各站点之外披露个体层面的数据。模拟结果表明,我们的方法可以提供对完全表征最优个体化治疗规则的参数的一致估计。我们使用来自国际华法林药物遗传学联盟的数据估计最优华法林剂量策略,其中数据稀疏性和较小的治疗-协变量相互作用效应带来了额外的统计挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00bf/12288668/ecafbd93b3ed/ujaf082fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00bf/12288668/a10fa95478f3/ujaf082fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00bf/12288668/9f2e9c20fb61/ujaf082fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00bf/12288668/ecafbd93b3ed/ujaf082fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00bf/12288668/a10fa95478f3/ujaf082fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00bf/12288668/9f2e9c20fb61/ujaf082fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00bf/12288668/ecafbd93b3ed/ujaf082fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Sparse 2-stage Bayesian meta-analysis for individualized treatments.用于个体化治疗的稀疏两阶段贝叶斯荟萃分析。
Biometrics. 2025 Jul 3;81(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujaf082.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Stopping anticoagulation for isolated or incidental pulmonary embolism: the STOPAPE RCT protocol.孤立性或偶发性肺栓塞抗凝治疗的停用:STOPAPE随机对照试验方案
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;29(11):1-17. doi: 10.3310/HRCW7937.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Variable selection for individualised treatment rules with discrete outcomes.针对具有离散结果的个体化治疗规则进行变量选择。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2023 Nov 2;73(2):298-313. doi: 10.1093/jrsssc/qlad096. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Privacy-preserving estimation of an optimal individualized treatment rule: a case study in maximizing time to severe depression-related outcomes.隐私保护的最优个体化治疗规则估计:最大化严重抑郁相关结局时间的案例研究。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2022 Jul;28(3):512-542. doi: 10.1007/s10985-022-09554-8. Epub 2022 May 2.
3
Preserving data privacy when using multi-site data to estimate individualized treatment rules.
使用多站点数据估计个体化治疗规则时保护数据隐私。
Stat Med. 2022 Apr 30;41(9):1627-1643. doi: 10.1002/sim.9318. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
4
Model selection for G-estimation of dynamic treatment regimes.动态治疗方案G估计的模型选择
Biometrics. 2019 Dec;75(4):1205-1215. doi: 10.1111/biom.13104. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
5
A Bayesian Machine Learning Approach for Optimizing Dynamic Treatment Regimes.一种用于优化动态治疗方案的贝叶斯机器学习方法。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(523):1255-1267. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1340887. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
6
Maximin Projection Learning for Optimal Treatment Decision with Heterogeneous Individualized Treatment Effects.用于具有异质个体化治疗效果的最优治疗决策的极大极小投影学习
J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2018 Sep;80(4):681-702. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12273. Epub 2018 May 10.
7
Decision making and uncertainty quantification for individualized treatments using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees.基于贝叶斯加法回归树的个体化治疗的决策制定与不确定性量化。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):1079-1093. doi: 10.1177/0962280217746191. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
8
Personalized Dose Finding Using Outcome Weighted Learning.使用结果加权学习的个性化剂量探索
J Am Stat Assoc. 2016;111(516):1509-1521. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1148611. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
9
Doubly-robust dynamic treatment regimen estimation via weighted least squares.通过加权最小二乘法进行双重稳健动态治疗方案估计。
Biometrics. 2015 Sep;71(3):636-44. doi: 10.1111/biom.12306. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
10
Dynamic Treatment Regimes.动态治疗方案
Annu Rev Stat Appl. 2014;1:447-464. doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-022513-115553.