• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于伊斯兰文化的导师指导问卷的构建与验证

Construction and validation of a mentoring questionnaire based on Islamic culture.

作者信息

Khaghanizadeh Morteza, Taqavi Husein, Ebadi Abbas

机构信息

Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Life Style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Faculty of Educational Sciences & Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

出版信息

Korean J Med Educ. 2019 Jun;31(2):159-172. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2019.127. Epub 2019 May 30.

DOI:10.3946/kjme.2019.127
PMID:31230438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6589618/
Abstract

Education is considered to be a cultural and value-driven matter where any intervention in this field requires certain tools in order to describe the status quo. The current study, while taking into account the contextual texts related to Islamic mentoring, seeks to develop a tool to quantify this concept, as well as introduce the respective psychometric properties. A 113 items questionnaire was designed after reviewing the literature, the recommended guidelines concerning Islamic mentor and mentee, and reviewing available international tools. Content validity of the questionnaire was evaluated based on several criteria of clarity, fitness, and comprehensiveness by a survey of 10 experts and the necessary corrections were made. In the primary phase of this study, the psychometric properties of this questionnaire were evaluated by collecting the data from a random sample of 213 Iranian Ph.D. students in Tehran Universities of Medical Sciences. The factors analysis results show that 70 items, in the form of nine factors, construct the Islamic monitoring. Furthermore, The Cronbach's α coefficient was determined for each factor and the entire questionnaire. Total reliability of the scale was obtained at 0.97. Considering the confirmed validity and reliability of the questionnaire, this tool can be highly beneficial for the experts and education professionals, particularly in the field of medicine, for the assessment and establishment of mentoring.

摘要

教育被视为一个受文化和价值观驱动的事项,在这一领域的任何干预都需要特定工具来描述现状。本研究在考虑与伊斯兰指导相关的背景文本的同时,试图开发一种工具来量化这一概念,并介绍相应的心理测量特性。在查阅文献、有关伊斯兰导师和学员的推荐指南以及现有国际工具后,设计了一份包含113个条目的问卷。通过对10位专家进行调查,根据清晰度、适用性和全面性等多项标准对问卷的内容效度进行了评估,并进行了必要的修正。在本研究的第一阶段,通过从德黑兰医科大学的213名伊朗博士生随机样本中收集数据,对该问卷的心理测量特性进行了评估。因素分析结果表明,70个条目以九个因素的形式构成了伊斯兰指导。此外,还确定了每个因素和整个问卷的克朗巴哈α系数。该量表的总信度为0.97。考虑到问卷已证实的效度和信度,该工具对专家和教育专业人员,特别是医学领域的人员,在评估和建立指导关系方面可能非常有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55c9/6589618/eea2682f6533/kjme-2019-127f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55c9/6589618/eea2682f6533/kjme-2019-127f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55c9/6589618/eea2682f6533/kjme-2019-127f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Construction and validation of a mentoring questionnaire based on Islamic culture.基于伊斯兰文化的导师指导问卷的构建与验证
Korean J Med Educ. 2019 Jun;31(2):159-172. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2019.127. Epub 2019 May 30.
2
Questionnaire to Measure the Participation of Nursing Professionals in Mentoring Students.测量护理专业人员参与指导学生情况的问卷。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2017 May;35(2):182-190. doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v35n2a07.
3
Psychometric testing of the Turkish version of the mentoring competency assessment scale for faculty.教师指导能力评估量表土耳其语版本的心理测量测试。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2018 Dec;68(12):1804-1808.
4
Design and Psychometrics of the Mentoring Questionnaire among Bachelor's Degree Students in Nursing.护理专业本科学生指导问卷的设计与心理测量学
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2020 Jun 17;25(4):314-318. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_138_19. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
5
Development and psychometric testing of the nursing student mentors' competence instrument (MCI): A cross-sectional study.护理学生导师能力量表(MCI)的编制与心理测量学测试:一项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Sep;68:93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.028. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
6
Psychometric Properties of a Developed Questionnaire to Assess Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Regarding Vitamin D (D-KAP-38).一份用于评估维生素D相关知识、态度和行为的自编问卷(D-KAP-38)的心理测量学特性
Nutrients. 2017 May 8;9(5):471. doi: 10.3390/nu9050471.
7
Development and initial validation of a dual-purpose questionnaire capturing mentors' and mentees' perceptions and expectations of the mentoring process.开发并初步验证了一份双重用途的问卷,用于捕捉导师和学员对辅导过程的看法和期望。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 8;19(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1574-2.
8
Developing mentorship in a resource-limited context: a qualitative research study of the experiences and perceptions of the makerere university student and faculty mentorship programme.在资源有限的情况下发展指导关系:对马凯雷雷大学学生和教师指导计划的经验和看法的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0962-8.
9
Development and validation of a multidimensional health literacy questionnaire for multiple sclerosis patients.开发和验证用于多发性硬化症患者的多维健康素养问卷。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Oct;25:156-162. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
10
Development and psychometric properties of the assessment questionnaire for the process of the tutorial action plan.辅导行动计划过程评估问卷的编制及心理测量学特性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 May;76:109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing Effective Mentor-Mentee Relationships in Radiology.在放射科建立有效的导师-学员关系。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Feb;15(2):328-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.10.027. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
2
Mentoring for new consultants.新顾问的指导
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2015;45(2):143-7. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2015.212.
3
The Mentoring Competency Assessment: validation of a new instrument to evaluate skills of research mentors.《指导能力评估》:一种新的评估研究导师技能的工具的验证。
Acad Med. 2013 Jul;88(7):1002-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318295e298.
4
Characteristics of successful and failed mentoring relationships: a qualitative study across two academic health centers.成功和失败的导师关系的特点:一项跨越两个学术健康中心的定性研究。
Acad Med. 2013 Jan;88(1):82-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827647a0.
5
Evaluating and giving feedback to mentors: new evidence-based approaches.评估和反馈导师:新的循证方法。
Clin Transl Sci. 2012 Feb;5(1):71-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00361.x. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
6
Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review.学术医学中的指导:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2006 Sep 6;296(9):1103-15. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.9.1103.
7
Determination and quantification of content validity.内容效度的确定与量化。
Nurs Res. 1986 Nov-Dec;35(6):382-5.