Wauthia Erika, Lefebvre Laurent, Huet Kathy, Blekic Wivine, El Bouragui Khira, Rossignol Mandy
Department of Cognitive Psychology and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.
National Fund for Human Research (FRESH), National Fund for Scientific Research, Brussels, Belgium.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 4;10:1185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01185. eCollection 2019.
Anxiety sensitivity (AS), namely the fear of anxiety symptoms, has been described as a precursor of sub-threshold anxiety levels. Sexton et al. (2003) posited that increased AS would arise from an elevated neuroticism and that both would act as vulnerability factors for panic disorder (PD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) symptoms. Accordingly, this study aimed to (1) evaluate the applicability of this model to a pediatric population and (2) examine the influences of the other Big-Five personality dimensions on the four lower-order dimensions of AS (cognitive, physical, control, and physical) and on social phobia (SP), separation anxiety disorder (SAD) and depression symptoms. 200 children (104 girls) aged between 8 and 12 years old (mean age = 132.52 months, = 14.5) completed (Silverman et al., 1991), (Barbaranelli et al., 2003), and (Chorpita et al., 2000). Regression analyses confirmed that AS and neuroticism together significantly predicted the presence of PD, OCD, and GAD symptoms but also SP, SAD, and depression symptoms. Moreover, neuroticism interacted with extraversion, conscientiousness and agreeableness to significantly predict SP, GAD, and depression. Surprisingly, the global AS score was only predicted by agreeableness, while AS dimensions also specifically related to openness. Finally, AS dimensions did not predict the presence of specific anxiety symptoms. To conclude, the predicting model of anxiety symptoms in children sets neuroticism and AS on the same level, with an unexpected influence of agreeableness on AS, raising the importance of other trait-like factors in the definition of such models. Moreover, AS should be considered as a unitary construct when predicting the presence of anxiety symptoms in children. Future interventions must consider these associations to help children detect and recognize the symptoms of their anxiety and help them to interpret them correctly.
焦虑敏感性(AS),即对焦虑症状的恐惧,被描述为阈下焦虑水平的先兆。塞克斯顿等人(2003年)认为,AS的增加源于神经质的升高,并且两者都将作为惊恐障碍(PD)、强迫症(OCD)和广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)症状的易感性因素。因此,本研究旨在(1)评估该模型对儿科人群的适用性,以及(2)研究其他大五人格维度对AS的四个低阶维度(认知、身体、控制和身体)以及社交恐惧症(SP)、分离焦虑障碍(SAD)和抑郁症状的影响。200名年龄在8至12岁之间的儿童(104名女孩)(平均年龄 = 132.52个月,标准差 = 14.5)完成了(西尔弗曼等人,1991年)、(巴巴拉内利等人,2003年)和(乔皮塔等人,2000年)的研究。回归分析证实,AS和神经质共同显著预测了PD、OCD和GAD症状的存在,以及SP、SAD和抑郁症状。此外,神经质与外向性、尽责性和宜人性相互作用,显著预测了SP、GAD和抑郁。令人惊讶的是,整体AS得分仅由宜人性预测,而AS维度也与开放性特别相关。最后,AS维度并未预测特定焦虑症状的存在。总之,儿童焦虑症状的预测模型将神经质和AS置于同一水平,宜人性对AS产生了意想不到的影响,凸显了其他特质类因素在此类模型定义中的重要性。此外,在预测儿童焦虑症状的存在时,AS应被视为一个统一的结构。未来的干预措施必须考虑这些关联,以帮助儿童检测和识别他们的焦虑症状,并帮助他们正确解释这些症状。