Grant V L
Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1987;93(4):405-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00207227.
The conditioned taste aversion (CTA) literature is extensive, yet little is known about the mechanisms by which treatments induce CTA. This paper describes and evaluates Garcia's hypothesis (e.g., Garcia et al. 1985) that treatments produce taste aversions by activating the receptors and neural pathways proposed by Borison and Wang (1953) to underlie emesis. Research on the mechanisms by which various treatments induce emesis is reviewed and compared with similar research on CTA. Emetic mechanisms appear to be involved appear to be involved in the formation of CTAs produced by some treatments, but there is contrary evidence for other treatments. This suggests that some CTAs are mediated by emetic mechanisms and others are not, so that Garcia's hypothesis is not generally correct. However, methodological and theoretical ambiguities make it premature to draw this conclusion.
关于条件性味觉厌恶(CTA)的文献极为丰富,但对于各种治疗方法诱发CTA的机制却知之甚少。本文描述并评估了加西亚的假说(例如,加西亚等人,1985年),即各种治疗方法通过激活由博里森和王(1953年)提出的、作为呕吐基础的受体和神经通路来产生味觉厌恶。本文回顾了关于各种治疗方法诱发呕吐机制的研究,并将其与关于CTA的类似研究进行了比较。催吐机制似乎参与了某些治疗方法所产生的CTA的形成,但也有其他治疗方法的相反证据。这表明有些CTA是由催吐机制介导的,而有些则不是,因此加西亚的假说并不普遍正确。然而,方法学和理论上的模糊性使得过早得出这一结论还为时过早。