• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食品供应链利益相关者对共享信息以检测和预防食品诚信问题的看法。

Food Supply Chain Stakeholders' Perspectives on Sharing Information to Detect and Prevent Food Integrity Issues.

作者信息

Minnens Fien, Lucas Luijckx Niels, Verbeke Wim

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

TNO, Utrechtseweg 48, 3704 Zeist, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Foods. 2019 Jun 25;8(6):225. doi: 10.3390/foods8060225.

DOI:10.3390/foods8060225
PMID:31242589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6616500/
Abstract

One of the biggest challenges facing the food industry is assuring food integrity. Dealing with complex food integrity issues requires a multi-dimensional approach. Preventive actions and early reactive responses are key for the food supply chain. Information sharing could facilitate the detection and prevention of food integrity issues. This study investigates attitudes towards a food integrity information sharing system (FI-ISS) among stakeholders in the European food supply chain. Insights into stakeholders' interest in participating and their conditions for joining an FI-ISS are assessed. The stakeholder consultation consisted of three rounds. During the first round, a total of 143 food industry stakeholders-covering all major food sectors susceptible to food integrity issues-participated in an online quantitative survey between November 2017 and February 2018. The second round, an online qualitative feedback survey in which the findings were presented, received feedback from 61 stakeholders from the food industry, food safety authorities and the science community. Finally, 37 stakeholders discussed the results in further detail during an interactive workshop in May 2018. Three distinct groups of industry stakeholders were identified based on reported frequency of occurrence and likelihood of detecting food integrity issues. Food industry stakeholders strongly support the concept of an FI-ISS, with an attitude score of 4.49 (standard deviation (S.D.) = 0.57) on a 5-point scale, and their willingness to participate is accordingly high (81%). Consensus exists regarding the advantages an FI-ISS can yield towards detection and prevention. A stakeholder's perception of the advantages was identified as a predictor of their intention to join an FI-ISS, while their perception of the disadvantages and the perceived risk of food integrity issues were not. Medium-sized companies perceive the current detection of food integrity issues as less likely compared to smaller and large companies. Interestingly, medium-sized companies also have lower intentions to join an FI-ISS. Four key success factors for an FI-ISS are defined, more specifically with regards to (1) the actors to be involved in a system, (2) the information to be shared, (3) the third party to manage the FI-ISS and (4) the role of food safety authorities. Reactions diverged concerning the required level of transparency, the type of data that stakeholders might be willing to share in an FI-ISS and the role authorities can have within an FI-ISS.

摘要

食品行业面临的最大挑战之一是确保食品完整性。应对复杂的食品完整性问题需要采取多维度方法。预防措施和早期反应是食品供应链的关键。信息共享有助于检测和预防食品完整性问题。本研究调查了欧洲食品供应链利益相关者对食品完整性信息共享系统(FI-ISS)的态度。评估了利益相关者参与的兴趣及其加入FI-ISS的条件。利益相关者咨询包括三轮。在第一轮中,2017年11月至2018年2月期间,共有143名食品行业利益相关者——涵盖所有易受食品完整性问题影响的主要食品部门——参与了在线定量调查。第二轮是在线定性反馈调查,在该调查中展示了调查结果,收到了来自食品行业、食品安全当局和科学界的61名利益相关者的反馈。最后,37名利益相关者在2018年5月的一次互动研讨会上进一步详细讨论了结果。根据报告的食品完整性问题发生频率和检测可能性,确定了三类不同的行业利益相关者。食品行业利益相关者强烈支持FI-ISS的概念,在5分制量表上的态度得分为4.49(标准差(S.D.)=0.57),因此他们参与的意愿很高(81%)。对于FI-ISS在检测和预防方面所能带来的优势存在共识。利益相关者对优势的认知被确定为其加入FI-ISS意愿的一个预测因素,而他们对劣势的认知以及对食品完整性问题的感知风险则不是。与小公司和大公司相比,中型公司认为当前检测到食品完整性问题的可能性较小。有趣的是,中型公司加入FI-ISS的意愿也较低。定义了FI-ISS的四个关键成功因素,更具体地涉及(1)系统中涉及的行为者,(2)要共享的信息,(3)管理FI-ISS的第三方,以及(4)食品安全当局的作用。对于所需的透明度水平、利益相关者在FI-ISS中可能愿意共享的数据类型以及当局在FI-ISS中可以发挥的作用,各方反应不一。

相似文献

1
Food Supply Chain Stakeholders' Perspectives on Sharing Information to Detect and Prevent Food Integrity Issues.食品供应链利益相关者对共享信息以检测和预防食品诚信问题的看法。
Foods. 2019 Jun 25;8(6):225. doi: 10.3390/foods8060225.
2
Food Credence Attributes: A Conceptual Framework of Supply Chain Stakeholders, Their Motives, and Mechanisms to Address Information Asymmetry.食品品质属性:供应链利益相关者、其动机及解决信息不对称机制的概念框架
Foods. 2023 Jan 25;12(3):538. doi: 10.3390/foods12030538.
3
Confronting Views of Companies and Authorities on Food Safety Issues-A Cross-Country Survey.企业与当局对食品安全问题的对立观点——一项跨国调查
Foods. 2024 Mar 1;13(5):773. doi: 10.3390/foods13050773.
4
Stakeholders' perceptions regarding a salt reduction strategy for India: Findings from qualitative research.利益相关者对印度减盐策略的看法:定性研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 6;13(8):e0201707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201707. eCollection 2018.
5
A sense of ginger fraud: prevalence and deconstruction of the China-European union supply chain.生姜欺诈之感:中国-欧盟供应链的流行情况与剖析
NPJ Sci Food. 2022 Nov 4;6(1):51. doi: 10.1038/s41538-022-00166-y.
6
Worlds apart? A scoping review addressing different stakeholder perspectives on barriers to family involvement in the care for persons with severe mental illness.天壤之别?一项范围综述,探讨不同利益相关者对家庭参与严重精神疾病患者护理的障碍的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 15;17(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2213-4.
7
Bridging barriers to advance multisector approaches to improve food security, nutrition and population health in Nepal: transdisciplinary perspectives.跨越障碍,推进多部门方法,改善尼泊尔的粮食安全、营养和人口健康:跨学科视角。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 18;19(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7204-4.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Multistakeholder Perspectives on Data Sharing to Address Patient Food Insecurity.多利益相关方视角下的数据共享以解决患者食物不安全问题。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Jan-Feb;35(1):85-95. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.01.210093.
10
360-degree Delphi: addressing sociotechnical challenges of healthcare IT.360 度德尔菲法:应对医疗信息技术的社会技术挑战。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1071-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Online Food-Safety Educational Programs: A Systematic Review, Random-Effects Meta-Analysis, and Thematic Synthesis.在线食品安全教育项目的有效性:系统评价、随机效应荟萃分析和主题综合
Foods. 2024 Mar 4;13(5):794. doi: 10.3390/foods13050794.
2
Exploring Sustainable Development Pathways for Agri-Food Supply Chains Empowered by Cross-Border E-Commerce Platforms: A Hybrid Grounded Theory and DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC Approach.探索跨境电子商务平台赋能的农业食品供应链可持续发展路径:一种混合扎根理论与决策试验与评价实验室-解释结构模型-交叉影响矩阵乘法应用分类分析方法
Foods. 2023 Oct 26;12(21):3916. doi: 10.3390/foods12213916.
3
Research on the Influencing Factors of Sustainable Supply Chain Development of Agri-Food Products Based on Cross-Border Live-Streaming E-Commerce in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Four years post-horsegate: an update of measures and actions put in place following the horsemeat incident of 2013.马肉丑闻四年后:2013年马肉事件后所采取措施及行动的最新情况
NPJ Sci Food. 2017 Nov 6;1:5. doi: 10.1038/s41538-017-0007-z. eCollection 2017.
2
Food fraud and adulteration: a challenge for the foresight of Veterinary Services.食品欺诈与掺假:兽医服务前瞻性面临的一项挑战。
Rev Sci Tech. 2017 Dec;36(3):1015-1024. doi: 10.20506/rst.36.3.2733.
3
Credit Evaluation System Based on Blockchain for Multiple Stakeholders in the Food Supply Chain.
基于中国跨境直播电商的农产品可持续供应链发展影响因素研究
Foods. 2023 Sep 4;12(17):3323. doi: 10.3390/foods12173323.
4
Mapping the Greek Wine Supply Chain: A Proposed Research Framework.绘制希腊葡萄酒供应链:一个拟议的研究框架。
Foods. 2021 Nov 18;10(11):2859. doi: 10.3390/foods10112859.
5
Mapping Sustainable Tomato Supply Chain in Greece: A Framework for Research.绘制希腊可持续番茄供应链:一个研究框架
Foods. 2020 Apr 26;9(5):539. doi: 10.3390/foods9050539.
6
Food Authentication: Techniques, Trends and Emerging Approaches.食品认证:技术、趋势与新兴方法
Foods. 2020 Mar 17;9(3):346. doi: 10.3390/foods9030346.
基于区块链的食品供应链多利益相关者信用评价体系
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 1;15(8):1627. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081627.
4
Recent Developments and Digital Perspectives in Food Safety and Authenticity.食品安全与真实性的最新发展与数字化视角。
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Jul 25;66(29):7562-7567. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b00843. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
5
Ensuring Food Integrity by Metrology and FAIR Data Principles.通过计量学和FAIR数据原则确保食品完整性。
Front Chem. 2018 May 22;6:49. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00049. eCollection 2018.
6
A holistic approach to food safety risks: Food fraud as an example.食品安全风险的整体应对方法:以食品欺诈为例。
Food Res Int. 2016 Nov;89(Pt 1):463-470. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.08.028. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
7
The perceived value of dairy product traceability in modern society: An exploratory study.现代社会中乳制品可追溯性的感知价值:一项探索性研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 May;98(5):3514-25. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9247. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
8
Making traceability work across the entire food supply chain.实现整个食品供应链的可追溯性。
J Food Sci. 2013 Dec;78 Suppl 2:B21-7. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12278. Epub 2013 Oct 18.