Suppr超能文献

患者完成的用于静脉血栓栓塞风险评估的Caprini风险评分的验证

Validation of a Patient-Completed Caprini Risk Score for Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment.

作者信息

Fuentes H E, Paz L H, Al-Ogaili A, Andrade X A, Oramas D M, Salazar-Adum J P, Diaz-Quintero L, Acob C, Tafur A, Caprini J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, John Stroger Jr. Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, United States.

Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States.

出版信息

TH Open. 2017 Oct 20;1(2):e106-e112. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607339. eCollection 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Individualized risk assessment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) using the Caprini risk score (CRS), coupled with targeted prophylaxis based on the score, is effective in reducing postoperative VTE. Critics contend that using this tool is time consuming for health care providers. We decided to create a patient-completed CRS and conducted a prospective study to compare the scores calculated by a patient with those calculated by a blinded physician for the same patient.  In phase 1, we interviewed patients in our deep vein thrombosis (DVT) support group who had a history of thrombosis and included their family members to determine areas of misunderstanding in the original CRS. We created a patient-completed form based on these interviews. In phase 2, we further optimized the questions after a CRS-trained, blinded physician scored 20 hospitalized patients during the pilot study. In the final (third) phase, we measured the agreement level between the new form filled out by the trained physicians and those filled out by the patients. The study was approved by our local institutional review board. Using PASS version 11, we determined that a sample size of 37 individuals achieves a power of 80%, to detect a 0.1 difference between the null hypothesis correlation of 0.5 and the alternative hypothesis correlation of 0.7 using a two-sided hypothesis test with a significance level of 0.05. We tabulated the individuals' answers and categorized the scores by using SPSS version 23 to estimate the kappa value, linear correlation, and the Bland-Altman test. A kappa value greater than 0.8 indicated an "almost perfect agreement."  We tested the first patient-completed CRS version (phase 2) in a 20-patient pilot study. A poor agreement was observed with the body mass index (BMI) responses in multiple iterations, and so we excluded the BMI calculation from the final patient-completed CRS form. We recruited 42 patients with an average age of 55, mostly female (45%), who completed less than college education (62%) to fill out the updated CRS form (phase 3). An almost perfect agreement was found for both the individual questions and the overall score comparing physician and patient answers, resulting in a high correlation (  = 0.95). In Bland-Altman, we did not find any trend for extreme values.  We created and validated a patient-completed CRS form that has an excellent agreement level with the physician-completed form. From the results, the physician only needs to calculate the BMI. The average time for a patient to complete the form was 5 minutes. The average time for the physician to finalize the score was approximately 6 minutes. Implementation studies are needed to assess the correlation of the aggregated score, derived from this form, with the occurrence of perioperative VTE.

摘要

使用Caprini风险评分(CRS)对静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)进行个体化风险评估,并根据该评分进行针对性预防,可有效降低术后VTE的发生。批评者认为,对医疗保健提供者而言,使用该工具耗时较长。我们决定创建一份患者自行填写的CRS,并开展一项前瞻性研究,比较患者自行计算的评分与不知情医生为同一患者计算的评分。

在第1阶段,我们采访了深静脉血栓形成(DVT)支持小组中有血栓形成病史的患者及其家庭成员,以确定他们对原始CRS存在误解的地方。基于这些访谈,我们创建了一份患者自行填写的表格。在第2阶段,经过CRS培训的不知情医生在初步研究中对20名住院患者进行评分后,我们进一步优化了问题。在最后(第3)阶段,我们测量了经过培训的医生填写的新表格与患者填写的表格之间的一致性水平。该研究获得了我们当地机构审查委员会的批准。使用PASS 11版本,我们确定样本量为37人时检验效能为80%,在显著性水平为0.05的双侧假设检验中,可检测出原假设相关性为0.5与备择假设相关性为0.7之间0.1的差异。我们将个人的答案制成表格,并使用SPSS 23版本对评分进行分类,以估计kappa值、线性相关性和Bland-Altman检验。kappa值大于0.8表示“几乎完全一致”。

我们在一项有20名患者的初步研究中测试了首个患者自行填写的CRS版本(第2阶段)。在多次迭代中,观察到体重指数(BMI)答案的一致性较差,因此我们在最终的患者自行填写的CRS表格中排除了BMI计算。我们招募了42名平均年龄为55岁的患者,其中大多数为女性(45%),学历低于大学水平(62%),让他们填写更新后的CRS表格(第3阶段)。比较医生和患者的答案发现,对于单个问题和总体评分,两者几乎完全一致,相关性较高(r = 0.95)。在Bland-Altman分析中,我们未发现任何极端值趋势。

我们创建并验证了一份患者自行填写的CRS表格,其与医生填写的表格一致性水平极佳。从结果来看,医生只需计算BMI。患者填写表格的平均时间为5分钟。医生确定最终评分的平均时间约为6分钟。需要开展实施研究,以评估从此表格得出的综合评分与围手术期VTE发生情况之间的相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f23/6524847/937d31166043/10-1055-s-0037-1607339-i170003-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验