• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者完成的用于静脉血栓栓塞风险评估的Caprini风险评分的验证

Validation of a Patient-Completed Caprini Risk Score for Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment.

作者信息

Fuentes H E, Paz L H, Al-Ogaili A, Andrade X A, Oramas D M, Salazar-Adum J P, Diaz-Quintero L, Acob C, Tafur A, Caprini J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, John Stroger Jr. Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, United States.

Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States.

出版信息

TH Open. 2017 Oct 20;1(2):e106-e112. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607339. eCollection 2017 Jul.

DOI:10.1055/s-0037-1607339
PMID:31249916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6524847/
Abstract

Individualized risk assessment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) using the Caprini risk score (CRS), coupled with targeted prophylaxis based on the score, is effective in reducing postoperative VTE. Critics contend that using this tool is time consuming for health care providers. We decided to create a patient-completed CRS and conducted a prospective study to compare the scores calculated by a patient with those calculated by a blinded physician for the same patient.  In phase 1, we interviewed patients in our deep vein thrombosis (DVT) support group who had a history of thrombosis and included their family members to determine areas of misunderstanding in the original CRS. We created a patient-completed form based on these interviews. In phase 2, we further optimized the questions after a CRS-trained, blinded physician scored 20 hospitalized patients during the pilot study. In the final (third) phase, we measured the agreement level between the new form filled out by the trained physicians and those filled out by the patients. The study was approved by our local institutional review board. Using PASS version 11, we determined that a sample size of 37 individuals achieves a power of 80%, to detect a 0.1 difference between the null hypothesis correlation of 0.5 and the alternative hypothesis correlation of 0.7 using a two-sided hypothesis test with a significance level of 0.05. We tabulated the individuals' answers and categorized the scores by using SPSS version 23 to estimate the kappa value, linear correlation, and the Bland-Altman test. A kappa value greater than 0.8 indicated an "almost perfect agreement."  We tested the first patient-completed CRS version (phase 2) in a 20-patient pilot study. A poor agreement was observed with the body mass index (BMI) responses in multiple iterations, and so we excluded the BMI calculation from the final patient-completed CRS form. We recruited 42 patients with an average age of 55, mostly female (45%), who completed less than college education (62%) to fill out the updated CRS form (phase 3). An almost perfect agreement was found for both the individual questions and the overall score comparing physician and patient answers, resulting in a high correlation (  = 0.95). In Bland-Altman, we did not find any trend for extreme values.  We created and validated a patient-completed CRS form that has an excellent agreement level with the physician-completed form. From the results, the physician only needs to calculate the BMI. The average time for a patient to complete the form was 5 minutes. The average time for the physician to finalize the score was approximately 6 minutes. Implementation studies are needed to assess the correlation of the aggregated score, derived from this form, with the occurrence of perioperative VTE.

摘要

使用Caprini风险评分(CRS)对静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)进行个体化风险评估,并根据该评分进行针对性预防,可有效降低术后VTE的发生。批评者认为,对医疗保健提供者而言,使用该工具耗时较长。我们决定创建一份患者自行填写的CRS,并开展一项前瞻性研究,比较患者自行计算的评分与不知情医生为同一患者计算的评分。

在第1阶段,我们采访了深静脉血栓形成(DVT)支持小组中有血栓形成病史的患者及其家庭成员,以确定他们对原始CRS存在误解的地方。基于这些访谈,我们创建了一份患者自行填写的表格。在第2阶段,经过CRS培训的不知情医生在初步研究中对20名住院患者进行评分后,我们进一步优化了问题。在最后(第3)阶段,我们测量了经过培训的医生填写的新表格与患者填写的表格之间的一致性水平。该研究获得了我们当地机构审查委员会的批准。使用PASS 11版本,我们确定样本量为37人时检验效能为80%,在显著性水平为0.05的双侧假设检验中,可检测出原假设相关性为0.5与备择假设相关性为0.7之间0.1的差异。我们将个人的答案制成表格,并使用SPSS 23版本对评分进行分类,以估计kappa值、线性相关性和Bland-Altman检验。kappa值大于0.8表示“几乎完全一致”。

我们在一项有20名患者的初步研究中测试了首个患者自行填写的CRS版本(第2阶段)。在多次迭代中,观察到体重指数(BMI)答案的一致性较差,因此我们在最终的患者自行填写的CRS表格中排除了BMI计算。我们招募了42名平均年龄为55岁的患者,其中大多数为女性(45%),学历低于大学水平(62%),让他们填写更新后的CRS表格(第3阶段)。比较医生和患者的答案发现,对于单个问题和总体评分,两者几乎完全一致,相关性较高(r = 0.95)。在Bland-Altman分析中,我们未发现任何极端值趋势。

我们创建并验证了一份患者自行填写的CRS表格,其与医生填写的表格一致性水平极佳。从结果来看,医生只需计算BMI。患者填写表格的平均时间为5分钟。医生确定最终评分的平均时间约为6分钟。需要开展实施研究,以评估从此表格得出的综合评分与围手术期VTE发生情况之间的相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f23/6524847/450dbc72a621/10-1055-s-0037-1607339-i170003-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f23/6524847/937d31166043/10-1055-s-0037-1607339-i170003-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f23/6524847/d30304a34506/10-1055-s-0037-1607339-i170003-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f23/6524847/450dbc72a621/10-1055-s-0037-1607339-i170003-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f23/6524847/937d31166043/10-1055-s-0037-1607339-i170003-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f23/6524847/d30304a34506/10-1055-s-0037-1607339-i170003-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f23/6524847/450dbc72a621/10-1055-s-0037-1607339-i170003-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a Patient-Completed Caprini Risk Score for Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment.患者完成的用于静脉血栓栓塞风险评估的Caprini风险评分的验证
TH Open. 2017 Oct 20;1(2):e106-e112. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607339. eCollection 2017 Jul.
2
Validation of a Patient-Completed Caprini Risk Assessment Tool for Spanish, Arabic, and Polish Speakers.针对说西班牙语、阿拉伯语和波兰语患者的患者自填式卡普里尼风险评估工具的验证
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Apr;24(3):502-512. doi: 10.1177/1076029617746505. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
3
Patient-Completed Caprini Risk Score for Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment: Developed and Validated from 1,017 Medical and Surgical Patients.用于静脉血栓栓塞风险评估的患者自评Caprini风险评分:基于1017例内科和外科患者开发并验证。
TH Open. 2022 Jul 21;6(3):e184-e193. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749170. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Clinical Validation of the Chinese Version of Patient Completed Caprini Risk Assessment Form.中文版患者完成卡普里风险评估表的临床验证。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2020 Jan-Dec;26:1076029620945038. doi: 10.1177/1076029620945038.
5
[Consistency evaluation between patient-completed and physician-completed Caprini scores].[患者填写与医生填写的Caprini评分之间的一致性评估]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2022 Aug 24;50(8):811-816. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20220110-00025.
6
Utilization of the Caprini score in conjunction with thrombodynamic testing reduces the number of unpredicted postoperative venous thromboembolism events in patients with colorectal cancer.Caprini 评分联合血栓动力检测可减少结直肠癌患者术后未预测到的静脉血栓栓塞事件的发生。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Jan;8(1):31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
7
Direct Comparison of Patient-completed and Physician-completed Caprini Scores for Plastic Surgery Patients.整形外科患者自我填写与医生填写的Caprini评分的直接比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Aug 8;7(8):e2363. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002363. eCollection 2019 Aug.
8
Validation of the Caprini risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism in high-risk surgical patients in the background of standard prophylaxis.在标准预防措施的背景下,验证 Caprini 风险评估模型在高危手术患者中的静脉血栓栓塞风险的有效性。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016 Apr;4(2):153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
9
Correlation of the Caprini Score and Venous Thromboembolism Incidence Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty-Results of a Single-Institution Protocol.Caprini 评分与初次全关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞发生率的相关性-单中心方案的结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Dec;32(12):3735-3741. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.06.042. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
10
Incidence and risk assessment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients admitted to intensive care unit for postoperative care.入住重症监护病房接受术后护理的癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞的发病率及风险评估
J BUON. 2018 Jan-Feb;23(1):500-506.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing of a risk-stratified patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making for extended postoperative thromboprophylaxis after major abdominal surgery for cancer.对一种基于风险分层的患者决策辅助工具进行测试,以促进癌症患者腹部大手术后延长术后血栓预防的共同决策。
Can J Surg. 2024 Aug 27;67(4):E320-E328. doi: 10.1503/cjs.014722. Print 2024 Jul-Aug.
2
Venous Thromboembolism in Burn Patients: A 5-Year Retrospective Study.烧伤患者静脉血栓栓塞症:一项 5 年回顾性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 2;60(2):258. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020258.
3
Development and validation of machine learning models for venous thromboembolism risk assessment at admission: a retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a Standardized Risk-Based Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Protocol in the Setting of Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery.甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术中基于风险的标准化静脉血栓栓塞预防方案的评估。
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Jun;224(6):1029-1035. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.054. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
2
Individualized Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification Using the 2005 Caprini Score to Identify the Benefits and Harms of Chemoprophylaxis in Surgical Patients: A Meta-analysis.采用 2005 年 Caprini 评分对手术患者进行个体化静脉血栓栓塞风险分层以明确化学预防的获益和危害:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1094-1103. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002126.
3
入院时静脉血栓栓塞风险评估机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项回顾性研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 29;10:1198526. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1198526. eCollection 2023.
4
Generalizability of COBRA: A Parsimonious Perioperative Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Model.COBRA 模型的可推广性:一种简洁的围手术期静脉血栓栓塞风险评估模型。
J Surg Res. 2024 Jan;293:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.08.008. Epub 2023 Sep 10.
5
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after bariatric surgery: a national survey of MBSAQIP director practices.减重手术后的静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)预防:对MBSAQIP主任实践的全国性调查。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023 Aug;19(8):799-807. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.12.038. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
6
Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis for abdominopelvic surgery: Development and evaluation of a risk-stratified patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision making.腹部盆腔手术的延长疗程血栓预防:开发和评估一种风险分层患者决策辅助工具以促进共同决策。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022 Nov 14;6(8):e12831. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12831. eCollection 2022 Nov.
7
Patient-Completed Caprini Risk Score for Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment: Developed and Validated from 1,017 Medical and Surgical Patients.用于静脉血栓栓塞风险评估的患者自评Caprini风险评分:基于1017例内科和外科患者开发并验证。
TH Open. 2022 Jul 21;6(3):e184-e193. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749170. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
A Prospective Study Evaluating Patterns of Responses to the Caprini Score to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism After Interventional Treatment for Varicose Veins.一项评估 Caprini 评分对预防静脉曲张介入治疗后静脉血栓栓塞反应模式的前瞻性研究。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec;28:10760296221112081. doi: 10.1177/10760296221112081.
9
Using the Caprini Risk Score to Increase VTE Awareness in the Community: The Know Your Score Project.采用 Caprini 风险评分提高社区静脉血栓栓塞症的认识:Know Your Score 项目。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec;28:10760296221107020. doi: 10.1177/10760296221107020.
10
Prognostic Value of Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Models in Patients with Severe COVID-19.静脉血栓栓塞风险评估模型在重症新型冠状病毒肺炎患者中的预后价值
TH Open. 2021 Jun 22;5(2):e211-e219. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730293. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Patient Preferences for Receiving Education on Venous Thromboembolism Prevention - A Survey of Stakeholder Organizations.
患者对接受静脉血栓栓塞预防教育的偏好——利益相关者组织调查
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152084. eCollection 2016.
4
Validation of the Caprini risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism in high-risk surgical patients in the background of standard prophylaxis.在标准预防措施的背景下,验证 Caprini 风险评估模型在高危手术患者中的静脉血栓栓塞风险的有效性。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016 Apr;4(2):153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
5
Evaluation of the Caprini Model for Venothromboembolism in Esophagectomy Patients.食管癌切除术患者静脉血栓栓塞的Caprini模型评估
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Dec;100(6):2072-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.098. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
6
Case series of elective instrumented posterior lumbar spinal fusions demonstrating a low incidence of venous thromboembolism.择期后路腰椎融合内固定术病例系列显示静脉血栓栓塞发生率较低。
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Oct;86(10):796-800. doi: 10.1111/ans.12702. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
7
Validation of a venous thromboembolism risk assessment model in gynecologic oncology.妇科肿瘤静脉血栓栓塞风险评估模型的验证。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jul;134(1):160-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.04.051. Epub 2014 May 4.
8
Reducing postoperative venous thromboembolism complications with a standardized risk-stratified prophylaxis protocol and mobilization program.采用标准化的风险分层预防方案和活动方案减少术后静脉血栓栓塞并发症。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jun;218(6):1095-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.061. Epub 2014 Mar 2.
9
Impact of the national venous thromboembolism risk assessment tool in secondary care in England: retrospective population-based database study.英国国家静脉血栓栓塞风险评估工具在二级医疗保健中的影响:基于人群的回顾性数据库研究
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2014 Sep;25(6):571-6. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000100.
10
Prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to Australian hospitals: summary of National Health and Medical Research Council clinical practice guideline.澳大利亚医院住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症的预防:澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究委员会临床实践指南概要。
Intern Med J. 2012 Jun;42(6):698-708. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02808.x.