Head of Dentistry Library, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,
Instruction & Liaison Librarian, Dentistry Library, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jul;107(3):352-363. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.556. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
To better support dentistry researchers in the ever-changing landscape of scholarly research, academic librarians need to redefine their roles and discover new ways to be involved at each stage of the research cycle. A needs assessment survey was conducted to evaluate faculty members' research support needs and allow a more targeted approach to the development of research services in an academic health sciences library.
The anonymous, web-based survey was distributed via email to full-time researchers at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto. The survey included twenty questions inquiring about researchers' needs and behaviors across three stages of the research cycle: funding and grant applications, publication and dissemination, and research impact assessment. Data were also collected on researchers' use of grey literature to identify whether current library efforts to support researchers should be improved in this area.
Among library services, researchers considered support for funding and grant applications most valuable and grey literature support least valuable. Researcher engagement with open access publishing models was low, and few participants had self-archived their publications in the university's institutional repository. Participants reported low interest in altmetrics, and few used online tools to promote or share their research results.
Findings indicate that increased efforts should be made to promote and develop services for funding and grant applications. New services are needed to assist researchers in maximizing their research impact and to increase researcher awareness of the benefits of open access publishing models, self-archiving, and altmetrics.
为了更好地支持牙科研究人员在不断变化的学术研究环境中,学术图书馆员需要重新定义他们的角色,并在研究周期的每个阶段发现新的参与方式。本研究通过需求评估调查评估了教员的研究支持需求,以便在学术健康科学图书馆中更有针对性地开发研究服务。
本匿名的网络调查通过电子邮件分发给多伦多大学牙科学院的全职研究人员。调查共包括 20 个问题,涉及研究人员在研究周期的三个阶段(资金和赠款申请、出版和传播以及研究影响评估)的需求和行为。还收集了研究人员对灰色文献的使用数据,以确定是否应该在这方面改进当前图书馆支持研究人员的工作。
在图书馆服务方面,研究人员认为资金和赠款申请支持最有价值,而灰色文献支持最没有价值。研究人员对开放获取出版模式的参与度较低,很少有参与者将其出版物自行存档到大学的机构知识库中。参与者表示对替代计量指标的兴趣较低,很少使用在线工具来推广或分享他们的研究成果。
研究结果表明,应该加大力度推广和开发资金和赠款申请服务。需要新的服务来帮助研究人员最大限度地提高其研究影响力,并提高研究人员对开放获取出版模式、自我存档和替代计量指标的好处的认识。