Department of Clinics and Surgery, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL-MG), Rua Gabriel Monteiro da Silva, 700, Alfenas, MG, Brazil.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, José do Rosário Vellano University (UNIFENAS), Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Dec;34(9):1917-1924. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02836-y. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
The present study aimed to evaluate in vitro whether the low-level laser (LLL) delivering fractionated total energy (multiple irradiation) or single irradiation stimulates regeneration-associated events (viability and proliferation) in stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED). Cells received LLL irradiation (InGaAlP-660 nm), according to the following experimental groups: G1 (single irradiation 2.5 J/cm, 10 mW, 10 s, 0.10 J), G2 (single irradiation 5.0 J/cm, 10 mW, 20 s, 0.20 J), G3 (single irradiation 7.5 J/cm, 10 mW, 30 s, 0.30 J), G4 (two irradiations 2.5 J/cm, 10 mW, 10 s; total energy 0.20 J), G5 (three irradiations 2.5 J/cm, 10 mW, 10 s; total energy 0.30 J), and G6 (non-irradiated). Cell viability was assessed by MTT and trypan blue exclusion (TBE) methods, while cell proliferation was evaluated by crystal violet (CV) and sulforhodamine B (SRB) assays after 24, 48, and 72 h after the first irradiation. By MTT, there was no difference between groups at 24 and 72 h. At 48 h, the groups subjected to multiple irradiation (G4 and G5) presented higher cell viability rates. The average percentages of viable cells for all groups by TBE method were 91.04%, 96.63%, and 97.48% at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. By CV, there was no significant difference between groups at 24 and 48 h; at 72 h, G2, G3, and G4 presented higher cell proliferation. By SRB, G1 and G4 presented lower proliferation rates in all the periods. When the groups presenting the same total energy were compared, G2 (0.20 J) presented lower cell viability rates and higher cell proliferation rates in comparison with G4; G3 (0.30 J) presented similar results to those of G5, with higher cell viability and proliferation. The application of laser delivering fractionated total energy (two or three applications of 2.5 J/cm) induced higher cell viability at 48 h, while the single irradiation with 2.5 J/cm did not stimulate metabolic activity in such period and the proliferation over time. The 5.0 and 7.5 J/cm single doses and the three applications of 2.5 J/cm maintained cell viability and stimulated proliferation of SHED at 72 h.
本研究旨在评估低水平激光(LLL)传递分割总能量(多次照射)或单次照射是否刺激人脱落乳牙(SHED)干细胞的再生相关事件(活力和增殖)。细胞接受 LLL 照射(InGaAlP-660nm),根据以下实验组:G1(单次照射 2.5J/cm,10mW,10s,0.10J),G2(单次照射 5.0J/cm,10mW,20s,0.20J),G3(单次照射 7.5J/cm,10mW,30s,0.30J),G4(两次照射 2.5J/cm,10mW,10s;总能量 0.20J),G5(三次照射 2.5J/cm,10mW,10s;总能量 0.30J),G6(未照射)。通过 MTT 和台盼蓝排除(TBE)方法评估细胞活力,而通过结晶紫(CV)和磺基罗丹明 B(SRB)测定法在第一次照射后 24、48 和 72 小时评估细胞增殖。通过 MTT,在 24 小时和 72 小时时,各组之间没有差异。在 48 小时时,接受多次照射的组(G4 和 G5)表现出更高的细胞活力率。用 TBE 法,所有组在 24、48 和 72 小时的活细胞平均百分比分别为 91.04%、96.63%和 97.48%。用 CV,在 24 小时和 48 小时时,各组之间没有显著差异;在 72 小时时,G2、G3 和 G4 呈现出更高的细胞增殖。用 SRB,G1 和 G4 在所有时期的增殖率较低。当比较具有相同总能量的组时,G2(0.20J)的细胞活力率较低,细胞增殖率较高,而 G4 则相反;G3(0.30J)的结果与 G5 相似,具有更高的细胞活力和增殖。传递分割总能量(两次或三次 2.5J/cm 照射)的激光应用在 48 小时诱导更高的细胞活力,而 2.5J/cm 的单次照射在该期间并未刺激代谢活性,并且随着时间的推移增殖。5.0 和 7.5J/cm 的单次剂量和三次 2.5J/cm 的应用在 72 小时保持细胞活力并刺激 SHED 的增殖。