Institute for Health and Sport (IHES), Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Psychology of Learning and Instruction, Department of Psychology, School of Science, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sports Med. 2019 Oct;49(10):1547-1557. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01143-4.
The Yo-Yo test is widely used both in the practical and research contexts; however, its true test-retest reliability remains unclear.
The present systematic review aims to identify studies that have examined the test-retest reliability of the Yo-Yo test and summarize their results.
A search of ten databases was performed to find studies that have investigated test-retest reliability of any variant of the Yo-Yo test. The COSMIN checklist was employed to assess the methodological quality of the included studies.
Nineteen studies of excellent or moderate methodological quality were included. When considering all variants of the Yo-Yo test, the included studies reported intra-class correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability ranging from 0.78 to 0.98 where 62% of all intra-class correlation coefficients were higher than 0.90, while 97% of intra-class correlation coefficients were higher than 0.80. The coefficients of variation ranged from 3.7 to 19.0%. Regardless of the variant of the test, the participants' familiarization with the test, and previous sport experience, the intra-class correlation coefficients generally seem high (≥ 0.90) and coefficients of variation low (< 10%).
The results of this review indicate that the Yo-Yo test (in all its variants) generally has good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. The evidence concerning reliability arises from 19 included studies that were of moderate or high methodological quality. Considering that most of the included studies examined the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery level 1 test while including Association Football players, more reliability studies examining Yo-Yo intermittent recovery level 2 test and Yo-Yo intermittent endurance level 1 and level 2 tests, and in the context of sports other than Association Football as well as in non-athletic populations, are required. Finally, future studies should explicitly state the type of intra-class correlation coefficient used for the reliability data analysis to allow for better between-study comparisons.
Yo-Yo 测试在实际和研究环境中都得到了广泛应用;然而,其真正的测试-重测信度仍不清楚。
本系统综述旨在确定研究测试-重测可靠性的研究,并总结其结果。
对十个数据库进行了搜索,以查找研究任何变体 Yo-Yo 测试的测试-重测可靠性的研究。使用 COSMIN 清单评估纳入研究的方法学质量。
纳入了 19 项研究,其方法学质量为优秀或中等。当考虑所有变体的 Yo-Yo 测试时,纳入的研究报告的重测可靠性的组内相关系数范围为 0.78 至 0.98,其中 62%的所有组内相关系数均高于 0.90,而 97%的组内相关系数均高于 0.80。变异系数范围为 3.7 至 19.0%。无论测试的变体如何,参与者对测试的熟悉程度和以前的运动经验,组内相关系数通常都很高(≥0.90),变异系数较低(<10%)。
本综述的结果表明,Yo-Yo 测试(所有变体)通常具有良好到极好的测试-重测可靠性。可靠性证据来自 19 项纳入的研究,这些研究具有中等或较高的方法学质量。考虑到大多数纳入的研究都检查了 Yo-Yo 间歇性恢复水平 1 测试,同时包括足球运动员,因此需要更多的可靠性研究检查 Yo-Yo 间歇性恢复水平 2 测试和 Yo-Yo 间歇性耐力水平 1 和水平 2 测试,以及在除足球以外的其他运动和非运动员人群中。最后,未来的研究应该明确说明用于可靠性数据分析的组内相关系数类型,以便于更好地进行研究间比较。