• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

金诺芬的成本效益:一项随机临床试验的结果

The cost effectiveness of auranofin: results of a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Thompson M S, Read J L, Hutchings H C, Paterson M, Harris E D

机构信息

Institute for Health Research, Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 1988 Jan;15(1):35-42.

PMID:3127585
Abstract

In a 6-month randomized trial at 14 sites, the cost effectiveness of auranofin (AF) treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis was gauged in comparison with placebo. Measures of global health and of impacts on daily life suggest that the benefits of disease modification outweigh adverse effects after 4 and 6 months of treatment (p less than 0.01), with negligible differences between placebo and treated patients after 1 and 2 months. Additional medical costs directly associated with AF treatment amounted to $778/patient annually. Observed differences in less direct medical costs, help received, and earnings were not statistically significant.

摘要

在一项为期6个月、涉及14个地点的随机试验中,对金诺芬(AF)治疗类风湿性关节炎患者的成本效益与安慰剂进行了比较。整体健康状况及对日常生活影响的测量结果表明,治疗4个月和6个月后,疾病改善带来的益处超过了不良反应(p<0.01),而在治疗1个月和2个月后,安慰剂组和治疗组患者之间的差异可忽略不计。与AF治疗直接相关的额外医疗费用为每年每位患者778美元。在不太直接的医疗费用、获得的帮助及收入方面观察到的差异无统计学意义。

相似文献

1
The cost effectiveness of auranofin: results of a randomized clinical trial.金诺芬的成本效益:一项随机临床试验的结果
J Rheumatol. 1988 Jan;15(1):35-42.
2
Dose response studies and longterm evaluation of auranofin in rheumatoid arthritis.金诺芬治疗类风湿关节炎的剂量反应研究及长期评估
J Rheumatol. 1988 Jan;15(1):28-34.
3
Hematuria in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving gold and D-penicillamine.接受金制剂和青霉胺治疗的类风湿关节炎患者的血尿
J Rheumatol. 1987 Feb;14(1):55-9.
4
Auranofin improves outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis. Results from a 2-year, double blind placebo controlled study.金诺芬可改善早期类风湿性关节炎的预后。一项为期两年的双盲安慰剂对照研究结果。
J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1747-54.
5
[Clinical effectiveness and tolerance of auranofin in patients with chronic polyarthritis. Results of a multicenter long-term study].金诺芬治疗慢性多关节炎患者的临床疗效与耐受性。一项多中心长期研究的结果
Z Rheumatol. 1988 Sep-Oct;47(5):342-6.
6
Long-term efficacy and safety of auranofin: a review of clinical experience.金诺芬的长期疗效与安全性:临床经验综述
Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1986;63:67-78.
7
A double-blind study comparing sodium aurothiomalate and auranofin in patients with rheumatoid arthritis previously stabilized on sodium aurothiomalate.一项双盲研究,比较金硫代苹果酸钠和金诺芬对之前已使用金硫代苹果酸钠病情稳定的类风湿关节炎患者的疗效。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1984;4(6):395-401.
8
Efficacy of roxithromycin in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had not received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a 3-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.罗红霉素在未接受改善病情抗风湿药物治疗的成年类风湿性关节炎患者中的疗效:一项为期3个月的随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
Clin Ther. 2009 Aug;31(8):1754-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.014.
9
Auranofin therapy and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a multicenter trial.金诺芬治疗类风湿关节炎患者及生活质量。一项多中心试验的结果。
Am J Med. 1986 Oct;81(4):565-78. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90539-5.
10
Double-blind randomized trial of diclofenac sodium versus placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.双氯芬酸钠与安慰剂治疗类风湿关节炎患者的双盲随机试验。
Clin Ther. 1986;8(4):427-38.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study.评估基于锚点的患者报告结局最小重要差异估计值的可信度:仪器开发和可靠性研究。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 4;369:m1714. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1714.
2
Rheumatoid arthritis and sexuality: a patient survey in France.类风湿关节炎与性生活:法国患者调查。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Sep 10;13:170. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-170.
3
Thoughts on health economics in rheumatoid arthritis.关于类风湿关节炎健康经济学的思考
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Nov;66 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii35-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.078964.
4
How can quality of life researchers make their work more useful to health workers and their patients?生活质量研究人员如何使他们的工作对医护人员及其患者更有用?
Qual Life Res. 2007 Sep;16(7):1097-105. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9223-3. Epub 2007 May 26.
5
Cost effectiveness analysis of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎中改善病情抗风湿药的成本效益分析
Rheumatol Int. 2007 Sep;27(11):1063-9. doi: 10.1007/s00296-007-0342-5. Epub 2007 Apr 14.
6
How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure.一个有充分依据的最小重要差异如何提高标签声明的透明度并改善对患者报告结局指标的解读。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Sep 27;4:69. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-69.
7
International variation in resource utilisation and treatment costs for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review.类风湿关节炎资源利用和治疗成本的国际差异:一项系统文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(3):243-57. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523030-00005.
8
Review of health economics modelling in rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎健康经济学模型综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(2 Suppl 1):55-69. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422001-00006.
9
A clinical and economic review of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.改善病情抗风湿药物的临床与经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(7):715-28. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119070-00002.
10
Auranofin versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis.金诺芬与安慰剂治疗类风湿关节炎的对比研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(2):CD002048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002048.