Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Center, Sejong Medical Research Institute, Gyunggi, Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mediplex Sejong Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 8;14(7):e0219302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219302. eCollection 2019.
This study aimed to develop and validate deep-learning-based artificial intelligence algorithm for predicting mortality of AHF (DAHF).
12,654 dataset from 2165 patients with AHF in two hospitals were used as train data for DAHF development, and 4759 dataset from 4759 patients with AHF in 10 hospitals enrolled to the Korean AHF registry were used as performance test data. The endpoints were in-hospital, 12-month, and 36-month mortality. We compared the DAHF performance with the Get with the Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) score, Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score, and other machine-learning models by using the test data. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the DAHF were 0.880 (95% confidence interval, 0.876-0.884) for predicting in-hospital mortality; these results significantly outperformed those of the GWTG-HF (0.728 [0.720-0.737]) and other machine-learning models. For predicting 12- and 36-month endpoints, DAHF (0.782 and 0.813) significantly outperformed MAGGIC score (0.718 and 0.729). During the 36-month follow-up, the high-risk group, defined by the DAHF, had a significantly higher mortality rate than the low-risk group(p<0.001).
DAHF predicted the in-hospital and long-term mortality of patients with AHF more accurately than the existing risk scores and other machine-learning models.
本研究旨在开发和验证一种基于深度学习的人工智能算法,用于预测急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的死亡率(DAHF)。
使用来自两家医院的 2165 名 AHF 患者的 12654 个数据集作为 DAHF 开发的训练数据,以及来自 10 家医院的 4759 名 AHF 患者的 4759 个数据集作为性能测试数据纳入韩国 AHF 注册研究。终点是院内、12 个月和 36 个月死亡率。我们使用测试数据比较了 DAHF 与 Get with the Guidelines-Heart Failure(GWTG-HF)评分、Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure(MAGGIC)评分和其他机器学习模型的性能。DAHF 预测院内死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.880(95%置信区间,0.876-0.884);这一结果明显优于 GWTG-HF(0.728 [0.720-0.737])和其他机器学习模型。对于预测 12 个月和 36 个月的终点,DAHF(0.782 和 0.813)明显优于 MAGGIC 评分(0.718 和 0.729)。在 36 个月的随访期间,DAHF 定义的高危组的死亡率明显高于低危组(p<0.001)。
DAHF 预测 AHF 患者的院内和长期死亡率比现有风险评分和其他机器学习模型更准确。