• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类在非互惠互动中对类人机器的信任变化的神经相关因素。

Neural Correlates of Variations in Human Trust in Human-like Machines during Non-reciprocal Interactions.

机构信息

School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Samsung SDS, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 10;9(1):9975. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46098-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-46098-8
PMID:31292474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6620272/
Abstract

As intelligent machines have become widespread in various applications, it has become increasingly important to operate them efficiently. Monitoring human operators' trust is required for productive interactions between humans and machines. However, neurocognitive understanding of human trust in machines is limited. In this study, we analysed human behaviours and electroencephalograms (EEGs) obtained during non-reciprocal human-machine interactions. Human subjects supervised their partner agents by monitoring and intervening in the agents' actions in this non-reciprocal interaction, which reflected practical uses of autonomous or smart systems. Furthermore, we diversified the agents with external and internal human-like factors to understand the influence of anthropomorphism of machine agents. Agents' internal human-likenesses were manifested in the way they conducted a task and affected subjects' trust levels. From EEG analysis, we could define brain responses correlated with increase and decrease of trust. The effects of trust variations on brain responses were more pronounced with agents who were externally closer to humans and who elicited greater trust from the subjects. This research provides a theoretical basis for modelling human neural activities indicate trust in partner machines and can thereby contribute to the design of machines to promote efficient interactions with humans.

摘要

随着智能机器在各种应用中广泛普及,高效操作它们变得越来越重要。为了实现人机之间富有成效的交互,需要监测人类操作者对机器的信任。然而,人类对机器信任的神经认知理解是有限的。在这项研究中,我们分析了非互惠人机交互过程中人类的行为和脑电图 (EEG)。在这种非互惠交互中,人类主体通过监控和干预代理的行为来监督他们的伙伴代理,这反映了自主或智能系统的实际用途。此外,我们通过外部和内部的类人因素使代理多样化,以了解机器代理的拟人化程度的影响。代理的内部类人特征表现在他们执行任务的方式上,这影响了主体的信任水平。通过 EEG 分析,我们可以定义与信任增减相关的大脑反应。信任变化对大脑反应的影响在与外部更接近人类且能引起主体更大信任的代理时更为明显。这项研究为建模人类神经活动以指示对伙伴机器的信任提供了理论基础,从而有助于设计机器以促进与人类的高效交互。

相似文献

1
Neural Correlates of Variations in Human Trust in Human-like Machines during Non-reciprocal Interactions.人类在非互惠互动中对类人机器的信任变化的神经相关因素。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 10;9(1):9975. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46098-8.
2
Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation.对自动化的信任。第二部分。过程控制模拟中信任与人为干预的实验研究。
Ergonomics. 1996 Mar;39(3):429-60. doi: 10.1080/00140139608964474.
3
Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace.多任务工作空间中的自动化信任和注意力分配。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Jul;70:194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
4
More Is Not Always Better: Impacts of AI-Generated Confidence and Explanations in Human-Automation Interaction.并非越多越好:人工智能生成的信心和解释对人机交互的影响。
Hum Factors. 2024 Dec;66(12):2606-2620. doi: 10.1177/00187208241234810. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
5
A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way.些许拟人化作用巨大。
Hum Factors. 2017 Feb;59(1):116-133. doi: 10.1177/0018720816687205.
6
Revisiting human-machine trust: a replication study of Muir and Moray (1996) using a simulated pasteurizer plant task.重新审视人机信任:使用模拟巴氏杀菌器工厂任务对 Muir 和 Moray(1996)的复制研究。
Ergonomics. 2021 Sep;64(9):1132-1145. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.1909752. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
7
Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.信息来源、谱系及可靠性对操作员与决策支持系统交互的影响。
Hum Factors. 2007 Oct;49(5):773-85. doi: 10.1518/001872007X230154.
8
Simple manipulations of anthropomorphism fail to induce perceptions of humanness or improve trust in an automated agent.简单的拟人化操作无法引起对人类的感知或提高对自动化代理的信任。
Appl Ergon. 2023 Sep;111:104027. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104027. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
9
Not all trust is created equal: dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions.并非所有信任都是一样的:在人机交互中基于性格和过往经历的信任。
Hum Factors. 2008 Apr;50(2):194-210. doi: 10.1518/001872008X288574.
10
Trust in smart systems: sharing driving goals and giving information to increase trustworthiness and acceptability of smart systems in cars.对智能系统的信任:分享驾驶目标和提供信息,以提高智能系统在汽车中的可信度和可接受性。
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):799-810. doi: 10.1177/0018720812443825.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding dimensions of trust in AI through quantitative cognition: Implications for human-AI collaboration.通过定量认知理解对人工智能的信任维度:对人机协作的启示。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 2;20(7):e0326558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326558. eCollection 2025.
2
Neural Correlates of Trust in Automation: Considerations and Generalizability Between Technology Domains.自动化信任的神经关联:技术领域之间的考量与可推广性
Front Neuroergon. 2021 Sep 3;2:731327. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2021.731327. eCollection 2021.
3
Empowering human-AI teams via Intentional Behavioral Synchrony.

本文引用的文献

1
How do we trust strangers? The neural correlates of decision making and outcome evaluation of generalized trust.我们如何信任陌生人?泛化信任的决策与结果评估的神经关联。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Oct;11(10):1666-76. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw079. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
2
EEG-Based Classification of Implicit Intention During Self-Relevant Sentence Reading.基于 EEG 的自我相关句子阅读时内隐意图分类。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2016 Nov;46(11):2535-2542. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2015.2479240. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
3
Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust.
通过有意的行为同步增强人类-人工智能团队的能力。
Front Neuroergon. 2023 Jun 20;4:1181827. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1181827. eCollection 2023.
4
Measurement of Trust in Automation: A Narrative Review and Reference Guide.自动化信任度的测量:叙述性综述与参考指南。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 19;12:604977. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604977. eCollection 2021.
5
Promises and trust in human-robot interaction.人机交互中的承诺与信任。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 6;11(1):9687. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88622-9.
6
Biosignal-Based Attention Monitoring to Support Nuclear Operator Safety-Relevant Tasks.基于生物信号的注意力监测以支持核操作员与安全相关的任务。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2020 Dec 21;14:596531. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2020.596531. eCollection 2020.
对自动化的信任:整合关于影响信任因素的实证证据。
Hum Factors. 2015 May;57(3):407-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720814547570. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
4
You have my word: reciprocity expectation modulates feedback-related negativity in the trust game.我向你保证:互惠期望会调节信任博弈中与反馈相关的负性情绪。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 26;10(2):e0119129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119129. eCollection 2015.
5
To believe or not to believe: trust choice modulates brain responses in outcome evaluation.相信或不相信:信任选择调节结果评价中的大脑反应。
Neuroscience. 2012 Jan 3;200:50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.10.035. Epub 2011 Oct 30.
6
Knowing when to trust others: an ERP study of decision making after receiving information from unknown people.何时信任他人:一项关于在从陌生人处获取信息后进行决策的事件相关电位研究
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009 Mar;4(1):23-34. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn034. Epub 2008 Oct 19.
7
Neural correlates of trust.信任的神经关联
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):20084-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710103104. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
8
Implicit trustworthiness decisions: automatic coding of face properties in the human amygdala.内隐可信度决策:人类杏仁核中面部特征的自动编码
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Sep;19(9):1508-19. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1508.
9
Learning the value of information in an uncertain world.在一个不确定的世界中了解信息的价值。
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Sep;10(9):1214-21. doi: 10.1038/nn1954. Epub 2007 Aug 5.
10
Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance.对自动化的信任:设计适度的依赖。
Hum Factors. 2004 Spring;46(1):50-80. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.