Suppr超能文献

老年人心血管风险预测模型:在初级保健人群中的开发和验证。

A cardiovascular risk prediction model for older people: Development and validation in a primary care population.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Neurology, Donderds Centre for Brain, Behaviour and Cognition, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Aug;21(8):1145-1152. doi: 10.1111/jch.13617. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

Abstract

Cardiovascular risk prediction is mainly based on traditional risk factors that have been validated in middle-aged populations. However, associations between these risk factors and cardiovascular disease (CVD) attenuate with increasing age. Therefore, for older people the authors developed and internally validated risk prediction models for fatal and non-fatal CVD, (re)evaluated the predictive value of traditional and new factors, and assessed the impact of competing risks of non-cardiovascular death. Post hoc analyses of 1811 persons aged 70-78 year and free from CVD at baseline from the preDIVA study (Prevention of Dementia by Intensive Vascular care, 2006-2015), a primary care-based trial that included persons free from dementia and conditions likely to hinder successful long-term follow-up, were performed. In 2017-2018, Cox-regression analyses were performed for a model including seven traditional risk factors only, and a model to assess incremental predictive ability of the traditional and eleven new factors. Analyses were repeated accounting for competing risk of death, using Fine-Gray models. During an average of 6.2 years of follow-up, 277 CVD events occurred. Age, sex, smoking, and type 2 diabetes mellitus were traditional predictors for CVD, whereas total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were not. Of the eleven new factors, polypharmacy and apathy symptoms were predictors. Discrimination was moderate (concordance statistic 0.65). Accounting for competing risks resulted in slightly smaller predicted absolute risks. In conclusion, we found, SBP, HDL, and total cholesterol no longer predict CVD in older adults, whereas polypharmacy and apathy symptoms are two new relevant predictors. Building on the selected risk factors in this study may improve CVD prediction in older adults and facilitate targeting preventive interventions to those at high risk.

摘要

心血管风险预测主要基于已在中年人群中得到验证的传统危险因素。然而,随着年龄的增长,这些危险因素与心血管疾病(CVD)之间的关联减弱。因此,对于老年人,作者开发并内部验证了致命和非致命 CVD 的风险预测模型,(重新)评估了传统和新因素的预测价值,并评估了非心血管死亡的竞争风险的影响。对来自 preDIVA 研究(强化血管护理预防痴呆,2006-2015 年)的 1811 名年龄在 70-78 岁且基线时无 CVD 的个体进行了事后分析,该研究是一项基于初级保健的试验,纳入了无痴呆和可能妨碍长期成功随访的疾病的个体。在 2017-2018 年,进行了 Cox 回归分析,模型中仅包含七个传统危险因素,以及一个评估传统和十一个新因素增量预测能力的模型。使用 Fine-Gray 模型重复了考虑死亡竞争风险的分析。在平均 6.2 年的随访期间,发生了 277 例 CVD 事件。年龄、性别、吸烟和 2 型糖尿病是 CVD 的传统预测因素,而总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和收缩压(SBP)则不是。在十一个新因素中,药物治疗和冷漠症状是预测因素。区分度中等(一致性统计量 0.65)。考虑竞争风险会导致预测的绝对风险略小。总之,我们发现,SBP、HDL 和总胆固醇不再预测老年人的 CVD,而药物治疗和冷漠症状是两个新的相关预测因素。在这项研究中选择的风险因素的基础上,可以提高老年人 CVD 的预测能力,并有助于将预防干预措施针对高危人群。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Older Adults.老年人的心血管风险预测
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025 Sep 9;27(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s11883-025-01339-2.
8
Prediction of cardiovascular events from systolic or diastolic blood pressure.从收缩压或舒张压预测心血管事件。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Jun;24(6):760-769. doi: 10.1111/jch.14468. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Primary Cardiovascular Prevention on Vascular Risk in Older Adults.初级心血管预防对老年人血管风险的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Sep;55(3):368-375. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.048. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
2
Comparison of variable selection methods for clinical predictive modeling.比较临床预测建模中的变量选择方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Aug;116:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验