Centre for Remote Health, Flinders University, PO Box 4066, Alice Springs, NT, 0871, Australia.
Department of Statistics, Data Science and Epidemiology, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 15;19(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4302-z.
Australia provides health care services for Indigenous peoples as part of its effort to enhance Indigenous peoples' wellbeing. However, biomedical frameworks shape Australia's health care system, often without reference to Indigenous wellbeing priorities. Under Indigenous leadership the Interplay research project explored wellbeing for Indigenous Australians in remote regions, through defining and quantifying Indigenous people's values and priorities. This article aimed to quantify relationships between health care access, mental and physical health, and wellbeing to guide services to enhance wellbeing for Indigenous Australians in remote regions.
Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers worked with Indigenous people in remote Australia to create a framework of wellbeing priorities. Indigenous community priorities were community, culture and empowerment; these interplay with government priorities for Indigenous development of health, education and employment. The wellbeing framework was further explored in four Indigenous communities through a survey which measured aspects of the wellbeing priorities. Indigenous community researchers administered the survey in their home communities to 841 Indigenous people aged 15 to 34 years from June 2014. From the survey items, exploratory factor analysis was used to develop constructs for mental and physical health, barriers to health care access and wellbeing. Relationships between these constructs were quantified through structural equation modelling.
Participants reported high levels of health and physical health (mean scores (3.17/4 [SD 0.96]; and 3.76/4 [SD 0.73]) and wellbeing 8.07/10 [SD 1.94]. Transport and costs comprised the construct for barriers to health care access (mean access score 0.89/1 [SD 0.28]). Structural equation modelling showed that mental health, but not physical health was associated with wellbeing (β = 0.25, P < 0.001; β = - 0.038, P = 0.3). Health care access had an indirect positive relationship with wellbeing through mental health (β = 0.047, P = 0.007). Relationships differed significantly for participants in remote compared with those in very remote communities.
Greater attention to mental health and recognition of the role of services outside the health care sector may have positive impacts on wellbeing for Indigenous people in remote/ very remote Australia. Aggregation of remote and very remote populations may obscure important differences between Indigenous communities.
澳大利亚为原住民提供医疗服务,以增进原住民的福祉。然而,生物医学框架塑造了澳大利亚的医疗保健系统,往往没有参考原住民的福祉优先事项。在原住民的领导下,互动研究项目通过定义和量化原住民的价值观和优先事项,探索了澳大利亚偏远地区原住民的福祉。本文旨在量化医疗保健的可及性、心理健康和身体健康与幸福感之间的关系,以指导服务,提高澳大利亚偏远地区原住民的幸福感。
原住民和非原住民研究人员与澳大利亚偏远地区的原住民合作,制定了一个福祉优先事项框架。原住民社区的优先事项是社区、文化和赋权;这些与政府对原住民健康、教育和就业发展的优先事项相互作用。通过一项调查,在四个原住民社区进一步探讨了这一福祉框架,该调查衡量了福祉优先事项的各个方面。2014 年 6 月,原住民社区研究人员在其家乡社区向 841 名 15 至 34 岁的原住民进行了调查。从调查项目中,通过探索性因素分析为心理健康和身体健康、医疗保健可及性障碍和幸福感构建了结构。通过结构方程模型量化了这些结构之间的关系。
参与者报告了较高的健康和身体健康水平(平均分数(3.17/4 [0.96];3.76/4 [0.73])和幸福感 8.07/10 [1.94])。交通和费用构成了医疗保健可及性障碍的结构(平均可达性分数 0.89/1 [0.28])。结构方程模型显示,心理健康,而不是身体健康与幸福感相关(β=0.25,P<0.001;β=-0.038,P=0.3)。医疗保健的可及性通过心理健康对幸福感有间接的积极影响(β=0.047,P=0.007)。对于偏远地区的参与者和非常偏远地区的参与者,这些关系存在显著差异。
更多关注心理健康,并认识到医疗保健部门以外的服务的作用,可能会对澳大利亚偏远/非常偏远地区的原住民幸福感产生积极影响。将偏远地区和非常偏远地区的人口聚集在一起,可能会掩盖原住民社区之间的重要差异。