• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在蜜蜂中,食欲和厌恶能力之间的表型权衡。

Genotypic trade-off between appetitive and aversive capacities in honeybees.

机构信息

Evolution, Genomes, Behavior and Ecology, CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, IRD (UMR 9191), 1 avenue de la Terrasse, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91198, France.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 16;9(1):10313. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46482-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-46482-4
PMID:31311964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6635639/
Abstract

Honey bees can learn both appetitive and aversive associations, using two olfactory conditioning protocols. Appetitive conditioning of the proboscis extension response (PER) involves associating an odor, the conditioned stimulus (CS) with a sucrose solution, the unconditioned stimulus (US). Conversely, aversive conditioning of the sting extension response (SER) involves associating the odor CS with an electric or thermal shock US. Here, we investigated the relationship between bees' appetitive and aversive learning capacities at the individual level and the influence of bees' genotype. As learning performance was shown to depend on an individuals' sensitivity to the US, we systematically measured four different traits in each individual bee: sensitivity to sucrose, PER learning performance with a sucrose US, sensitivity to temperature, SER learning with a temperature US. First, we confirmed for both conditioning types that learning performance correlates with US responsiveness. Second, we found a trade-off between appetitive and aversive learning performances: bees that were better appetitive learners (and had a lower sucrose US threshold) learned less efficiently in the aversive conditioning (and had a higher temperature US threshold). Because the honey bee queen typically mates with 15-20 males, the workers from a honey bee hive belong to as many different patrilines, allowing for the search of the genetic determinism of cognitive abilities. Using microsatellite analysis, we show that a genetic determinism underlies the trade-off between appetitive and aversive capacities, with appetitively vs aversively biased patrilines. The honey bee hive thus appears as a genetically structured cognitive community.

摘要

蜜蜂可以通过两种嗅觉条件作用协议来学习食欲和厌恶联想。味觉延伸反应(PER)的条件作用涉及将气味(条件刺激,CS)与蔗糖溶液(非条件刺激,US)联系起来。相反,蜇刺延伸反应(SER)的厌恶条件作用涉及将气味 CS 与电击或热冲击 US 联系起来。在这里,我们研究了个体水平上蜜蜂的食欲和厌恶学习能力之间的关系以及蜜蜂基因型的影响。由于学习表现取决于个体对 US 的敏感性,我们系统地测量了每个个体蜜蜂的四个不同特征:对蔗糖的敏感性、用蔗糖 US 进行 PER 学习表现、对温度的敏感性、用温度 US 进行 SER 学习。首先,我们确认了这两种条件作用类型的学习表现都与 US 反应性相关。其次,我们发现食欲和厌恶学习表现之间存在权衡:食欲学习表现较好的蜜蜂(蔗糖 US 阈值较低)在厌恶条件作用中的学习效率较低(温度 US 阈值较高)。由于蜂王通常与 15-20 只雄蜂交配,因此蜂群中的工蜂来自许多不同的父系线,这使得我们能够探索认知能力的遗传决定因素。通过微卫星分析,我们表明,在食欲和厌恶能力之间存在一种遗传决定因素,即食欲和厌恶偏向的父系线。因此,蜜蜂蜂巢似乎是一个具有遗传结构的认知社区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/f35a22a34dc7/41598_2019_46482_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/b200aa5a9580/41598_2019_46482_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/7e313f989fae/41598_2019_46482_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/00953d39eb7c/41598_2019_46482_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/691117ff3b69/41598_2019_46482_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/98ec587f58ff/41598_2019_46482_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/021aa0b06e5e/41598_2019_46482_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/f35a22a34dc7/41598_2019_46482_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/b200aa5a9580/41598_2019_46482_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/7e313f989fae/41598_2019_46482_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/00953d39eb7c/41598_2019_46482_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/691117ff3b69/41598_2019_46482_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/98ec587f58ff/41598_2019_46482_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/021aa0b06e5e/41598_2019_46482_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6635639/f35a22a34dc7/41598_2019_46482_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Genotypic trade-off between appetitive and aversive capacities in honeybees.在蜜蜂中,食欲和厌恶能力之间的表型权衡。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 16;9(1):10313. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46482-4.
2
Genotypic influence on aversive conditioning in honeybees, using a novel thermal reinforcement procedure.利用一种新型热强化程序研究基因型对蜜蜂厌恶条件反射的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 May 14;9(5):e97333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097333. eCollection 2014.
3
Appetitive but not aversive olfactory conditioning modifies antennal movements in honeybees.偏好性而非厌恶性嗅觉条件反射会改变蜜蜂的触角运动。
Learn Mem. 2015 Nov 16;22(12):604-16. doi: 10.1101/lm.038448.115. Print 2015 Dec.
4
Appetitive and aversive olfactory learning induce similar generalization rates in the honey bee.蜜蜂的食欲性和厌恶性嗅觉学习诱导相似的泛化率。
Anim Cogn. 2014 Mar;17(2):399-406. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0671-6.
5
Rules and mechanisms of punishment learning in honey bees: the aversive conditioning of the sting extension response.在蜜蜂中惩罚学习的规则和机制:刺延伸反应的厌恶条件作用。
J Exp Biol. 2013 Aug 15;216(Pt 16):2985-97. doi: 10.1242/jeb.086629.
6
Odour aversion after olfactory conditioning of the sting extension reflex in honeybees.蜜蜂蛰刺伸展反射嗅觉条件化后的气味厌恶
J Exp Biol. 2009 Mar;212(Pt 5):620-6. doi: 10.1242/jeb.026641.
7
Aversive learning in honeybees revealed by the olfactory conditioning of the sting extension reflex.通过对蜇刺伸展反射的嗅觉条件作用揭示蜜蜂的厌恶性学习。
PLoS One. 2007 Mar 14;2(3):e288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000288.
8
Conditional withholding of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera) during discriminative punishment.在差别性惩罚期间蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)对喙伸展的条件性抑制
J Comp Psychol. 1991 Dec;105(4):345-56. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.105.4.345.
9
Olfactory memory formation and the influence of reward pathway during appetitive learning by honey bees.蜜蜂在食欲性学习过程中的嗅觉记忆形成及奖赏通路的影响。
J Exp Biol. 2007 Nov;210(Pt 22):4024-33. doi: 10.1242/jeb.006585.
10
Aversive learning overcomes appetitive innate responding in honeybees.厌恶学习克服了蜜蜂的先天食欲反应。
Anim Cogn. 2012 Jan;15(1):135-41. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0426-1. Epub 2011 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Cercus Electric Stimulation Enables Cockroach with Trajectory Control and Spatial Cognition Training.尾须电刺激使蟑螂具备轨迹控制和空间认知训练能力。
Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2025 Mar 7;6:0154. doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0154. eCollection 2025.
2
Individual consistency in the learning abilities of honey bees: cognitive specialization within sensory and reinforcement modalities.个体在蜜蜂学习能力上的一致性:感觉和强化模态内的认知专门化。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jun;26(3):909-928. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01741-2. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
3
Behavioral variation across the days and lives of honey bees.

本文引用的文献

1
Aminergic neuromodulation of associative visual learning in harnessed honey bees.被束缚的蜜蜂的关联视觉学习的胺能神经调制。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018 Nov;155:556-567. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 21.
2
Responses to sugar and sugar receptor gene expression in different social roles of the honeybee (Apis mellifera).蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)不同社会角色中对糖及糖受体基因表达的反应
J Insect Physiol. 2018 Apr;106(Pt 1):65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
3
THE ORIGIN OF WEST EUROPEAN SUBSPECIES OF HONEYBEES (APIS MELLIFERA): NEW INSIGHTS FROM MICROSATELLITE AND MITOCHONDRIAL DATA.
蜜蜂在不同日子和生命阶段的行为变化。
iScience. 2022 Aug 8;25(9):104842. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104842. eCollection 2022 Sep 16.
4
The short neuropeptide F regulates appetitive but not aversive responsiveness in a social insect.短神经肽F调节一种社会性昆虫的食欲反应,但不调节厌恶反应。
iScience. 2021 Dec 11;25(1):103619. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103619. eCollection 2022 Jan 21.
5
The neuroethology of olfactory sex communication in the honeybee Apis mellifera L.蜜蜂 Apis mellifera L. 中嗅觉性通讯的神经行为学
Cell Tissue Res. 2021 Jan;383(1):177-194. doi: 10.1007/s00441-020-03401-8. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
6
Cockroaches Show Individuality in Learning and Memory During Classical and Operant Conditioning.蟑螂在经典条件反射和操作性条件反射过程中的学习与记忆表现出个体差异。
Front Physiol. 2020 Jan 8;10:1539. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01539. eCollection 2019.
欧洲蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)亚种的起源:来自微卫星和线粒体数据的新见解
Evolution. 1998 Aug;52(4):1119-1134. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01839.x.
4
Learning, gustatory responsiveness and tyramine differences across nurse and forager honeybees.保育蜂和觅食蜂在学习、味觉反应及酪胺方面的差异
J Exp Biol. 2017 Apr 15;220(Pt 8):1443-1450. doi: 10.1242/jeb.152496. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
5
Heat Perception and Aversive Learning in Honey Bees: Putative Involvement of the Thermal/Chemical Sensor AmHsTRPA.蜜蜂的热感知与厌恶性学习:热/化学传感器AmHsTRPA的假定作用
Front Physiol. 2015 Nov 25;6:316. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00316. eCollection 2015.
6
Genotypic influence on aversive conditioning in honeybees, using a novel thermal reinforcement procedure.利用一种新型热强化程序研究基因型对蜜蜂厌恶条件反射的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 May 14;9(5):e97333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097333. eCollection 2014.
7
Pharmacological modulation of aversive responsiveness in honey bees.蜜蜂厌恶反应的药理学调节
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jan 7;7:221. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00221. eCollection 2013.
8
Interindividual variability in social insects - proximate causes and ultimate consequences.社会性昆虫的个体间变异性——近因和终级后果。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2014 Aug;89(3):671-87. doi: 10.1111/brv.12074. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
9
Biogenic amines and collective organization in a superorganism: neuromodulation of social behavior in ants.生物胺与超级生物体中的群体组织:蚂蚁社会行为的神经调节
Brain Behav Evol. 2013;82(4):220-36. doi: 10.1159/000356091. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
10
Octopamine improves learning in newly emerged bees but not in old foragers.章鱼胺可改善新出巢蜜蜂的学习能力,但不能改善老年觅食蜂的学习能力。
J Exp Biol. 2012 Apr 1;215(Pt 7):1076-83. doi: 10.1242/jeb.063297.