Université de Toulouse (UPS), Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Toulouse, France.
Anim Cogn. 2012 Jan;15(1):135-41. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0426-1. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
Despite their miniature brain, honeybees have emerged as a powerful model for the study of learning and memory. Yet, they also exhibit innate responses to biologically relevant social signals such as pheromones. Here, we asked whether the bees' developed learning capabilities allow them to overcome hardwired appetitive responses. Can they learn that attractant pheromones, that are not normally associated with a noxious stimulation in nature, predict the punishment of an electric shock? Immobilized honeybees were trained to discriminate two odorants, one that was paired with a shock and another that had no consequences. We measured whether they learned to produce aversive sting extension responses to the punished but not the non-punished odorant. One odorant was a neutral odor without innate value while the other was either an attractive pheromone (geraniol or citral) or an attractive floral odorant (phenylacetaldehyde). In all cases, bees developed a conditioned aversive response to the punished odorant, be it pheromone or not, and efficiently retrieved this information 1 h later. No learning asymmetries between odors were found. Thus, associative aversive learning in bees is strong enough to override preprogrammed responding, thus reflecting an impressive behavioral flexibility.
尽管蜜蜂的大脑很小,但它们已经成为学习和记忆研究的有力模型。然而,它们也会对生物相关的社会信号(如信息素)产生先天反应。在这里,我们想知道蜜蜂的学习能力是否足以克服先天的趋食反应。它们能否学会将原本与自然中有害刺激无关的吸引性信息素与电击的惩罚联系起来?我们将被固定的蜜蜂训练成辨别两种气味,一种与电击有关,另一种则没有任何后果。我们测量它们是否学会对受惩罚的气味而不是未受惩罚的气味产生厌恶的蜇刺延伸反应。一种气味是中性的,没有先天的价值,而另一种是有吸引力的信息素(香叶醇或柠檬醛)或有吸引力的花香(苯乙醛)。在所有情况下,蜜蜂对受惩罚的气味(无论是否是信息素)都产生了条件性的厌恶反应,并能在 1 小时后有效地回忆起这种信息。我们没有发现气味之间存在学习不对称性。因此,蜜蜂的联想性厌恶学习能力足以克服预先设定的反应,从而反映出令人印象深刻的行为灵活性。