• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

厌恶学习克服了蜜蜂的先天食欲反应。

Aversive learning overcomes appetitive innate responding in honeybees.

机构信息

Université de Toulouse (UPS), Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2012 Jan;15(1):135-41. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0426-1. Epub 2011 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-011-0426-1
PMID:21670947
Abstract

Despite their miniature brain, honeybees have emerged as a powerful model for the study of learning and memory. Yet, they also exhibit innate responses to biologically relevant social signals such as pheromones. Here, we asked whether the bees' developed learning capabilities allow them to overcome hardwired appetitive responses. Can they learn that attractant pheromones, that are not normally associated with a noxious stimulation in nature, predict the punishment of an electric shock? Immobilized honeybees were trained to discriminate two odorants, one that was paired with a shock and another that had no consequences. We measured whether they learned to produce aversive sting extension responses to the punished but not the non-punished odorant. One odorant was a neutral odor without innate value while the other was either an attractive pheromone (geraniol or citral) or an attractive floral odorant (phenylacetaldehyde). In all cases, bees developed a conditioned aversive response to the punished odorant, be it pheromone or not, and efficiently retrieved this information 1 h later. No learning asymmetries between odors were found. Thus, associative aversive learning in bees is strong enough to override preprogrammed responding, thus reflecting an impressive behavioral flexibility.

摘要

尽管蜜蜂的大脑很小,但它们已经成为学习和记忆研究的有力模型。然而,它们也会对生物相关的社会信号(如信息素)产生先天反应。在这里,我们想知道蜜蜂的学习能力是否足以克服先天的趋食反应。它们能否学会将原本与自然中有害刺激无关的吸引性信息素与电击的惩罚联系起来?我们将被固定的蜜蜂训练成辨别两种气味,一种与电击有关,另一种则没有任何后果。我们测量它们是否学会对受惩罚的气味而不是未受惩罚的气味产生厌恶的蜇刺延伸反应。一种气味是中性的,没有先天的价值,而另一种是有吸引力的信息素(香叶醇或柠檬醛)或有吸引力的花香(苯乙醛)。在所有情况下,蜜蜂对受惩罚的气味(无论是否是信息素)都产生了条件性的厌恶反应,并能在 1 小时后有效地回忆起这种信息。我们没有发现气味之间存在学习不对称性。因此,蜜蜂的联想性厌恶学习能力足以克服预先设定的反应,从而反映出令人印象深刻的行为灵活性。

相似文献

1
Aversive learning overcomes appetitive innate responding in honeybees.厌恶学习克服了蜜蜂的先天食欲反应。
Anim Cogn. 2012 Jan;15(1):135-41. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0426-1. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
2
Aversive learning in honeybees revealed by the olfactory conditioning of the sting extension reflex.通过对蜇刺伸展反射的嗅觉条件作用揭示蜜蜂的厌恶性学习。
PLoS One. 2007 Mar 14;2(3):e288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000288.
3
Appetitive but not aversive olfactory conditioning modifies antennal movements in honeybees.偏好性而非厌恶性嗅觉条件反射会改变蜜蜂的触角运动。
Learn Mem. 2015 Nov 16;22(12):604-16. doi: 10.1101/lm.038448.115. Print 2015 Dec.
4
Rules and mechanisms of punishment learning in honey bees: the aversive conditioning of the sting extension response.在蜜蜂中惩罚学习的规则和机制:刺延伸反应的厌恶条件作用。
J Exp Biol. 2013 Aug 15;216(Pt 16):2985-97. doi: 10.1242/jeb.086629.
5
Genotypic trade-off between appetitive and aversive capacities in honeybees.在蜜蜂中,食欲和厌恶能力之间的表型权衡。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 16;9(1):10313. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46482-4.
6
Conditional withholding of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera) during discriminative punishment.在差别性惩罚期间蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)对喙伸展的条件性抑制
J Comp Psychol. 1991 Dec;105(4):345-56. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.105.4.345.
7
Appetitive and aversive olfactory learning induce similar generalization rates in the honey bee.蜜蜂的食欲性和厌恶性嗅觉学习诱导相似的泛化率。
Anim Cogn. 2014 Mar;17(2):399-406. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0671-6.
8
Odour aversion after olfactory conditioning of the sting extension reflex in honeybees.蜜蜂蛰刺伸展反射嗅觉条件化后的气味厌恶
J Exp Biol. 2009 Mar;212(Pt 5):620-6. doi: 10.1242/jeb.026641.
9
Honey Bees Modulate Their Olfactory Learning in the Presence of Hornet Predators and Alarm Component.蜜蜂在黄蜂捕食者和警报成分存在的情况下调节其嗅觉学习。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 26;11(2):e0150399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150399. eCollection 2016.
10
Queen pheromone blocks aversive learning in young worker bees.蜂王信息素会阻碍年轻工蜂的厌恶性学习。
Science. 2007 Jul 20;317(5836):384-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1142448.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpreting insect behavior through the lens of executive functions.从执行功能的角度解读昆虫行为。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2025 Aug 4;19:1638374. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1638374. eCollection 2025.
2
Learning and cognition in highspeed decision making.高速决策中的学习与认知
Elife. 2025 Jun 25;13:RP99634. doi: 10.7554/eLife.99634.
3
Aversive learning reduces aversive-reinforcer sensitivity in honey bees.厌恶学习降低了蜜蜂对厌恶强化物的敏感性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):6964. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88267-y.
4
Innate and learned components of egg recognition in the ant .蚂蚁卵识别中的先天与习得成分
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jun 26;11(6):231837. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231837. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Hard limits to cognitive flexibility: ants can learn to ignore but not avoid pheromone trails.认知灵活性的硬性限制:蚂蚁可以学会忽略但不能避免信息素踪迹。
J Exp Biol. 2021 Jun 1;224(11). doi: 10.1242/jeb.242454. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
6
Inhibitory learning of phototaxis by honeybees in a passive-avoidance task.在被动回避任务中,蜜蜂对趋光性的抑制性学习。
Learn Mem. 2019 Sep 16;26(10):1-12. doi: 10.1101/lm.050120.119. Print 2019 Oct.
7
Aversive Training of Honey Bees in an Automated Y-Maze.在自动Y型迷宫中对蜜蜂进行厌恶训练。
Front Physiol. 2019 Jun 4;10:678. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00678. eCollection 2019.
8
Aversive gustatory learning and perception in honey bees.蜜蜂的厌恶味觉学习和感知。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 22;8(1):1343. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19715-1.
9
Factors influencing aversive learning in the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis.影响橘小实蝇厌恶性学习的因素
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2017 Jan;203(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s00359-016-1135-7. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
10
Honey Bees Modulate Their Olfactory Learning in the Presence of Hornet Predators and Alarm Component.蜜蜂在黄蜂捕食者和警报成分存在的情况下调节其嗅觉学习。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 26;11(2):e0150399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150399. eCollection 2016.