• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在噪声环境中的双人对话中的言语、动作和注视行为。

Speech, movement, and gaze behaviours during dyadic conversation in noise.

机构信息

Hearing Sciences - Scottish Section, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 18;9(1):10451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46416-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-46416-0
PMID:31320658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6639257/
Abstract

How do people have conversations in noise and make themselves understood? While many previous studies have investigated speaking and listening in isolation, this study focuses on the behaviour of pairs of individuals in an ecologically valid context. Specifically, we report the fine-grained dynamics of natural conversation between interlocutors of varying hearing ability (n = 30), addressing how different levels of background noise affect speech, movement, and gaze behaviours. We found that as noise increased, people spoke louder and moved closer together, although these behaviours provided relatively small acoustic benefit (0.32 dB speech level increase per 1 dB noise increase). We also found that increased noise led to shorter utterances and increased gaze to the speaker's mouth. Surprisingly, interlocutors did not make use of potentially beneficial head orientations. While participants were able to sustain conversation in noise of up to 72 dB, changes in conversation structure suggested increased difficulty at 78 dB, with a significant decrease in turn-taking success. Understanding these natural conversation behaviours could inform broader models of interpersonal communication, and be applied to the development of new communication technologies. Furthermore, comparing these findings with those from isolation paradigms demonstrates the importance of investigating social processes in ecologically valid multi-person situations.

摘要

人们在噪声环境中如何进行对话并使彼此理解?虽然之前有许多研究分别调查了说话和倾听的情况,但本研究关注的是在生态有效背景下的两个人的行为。具体来说,我们报告了不同听力能力的交谈者之间的自然对话的细粒度动态(n=30),探讨了不同水平的背景噪声如何影响言语、运动和注视行为。我们发现,随着噪声的增加,人们会说得更大声,彼此之间也靠得更近,尽管这些行为只带来了相对较小的声学增益(噪声每增加 1dB,语音水平增加 0.32dB)。我们还发现,增加的噪声会导致言语变短,并且注视说话者的嘴的次数增加。令人惊讶的是,交谈者并没有利用潜在有益的头部方向。虽然参与者能够在高达 72dB 的噪声中维持对话,但在 78dB 的噪声中,对话结构的变化表明难度增加,轮流成功的次数显著减少。了解这些自然对话行为可以为更广泛的人际沟通模型提供信息,并应用于新的沟通技术的开发。此外,将这些发现与隔离范式的发现进行比较,证明了在生态有效多人情境中研究社交过程的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4bd/6639257/4f1530d8b63a/41598_2019_46416_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4bd/6639257/1dcd5fc37b06/41598_2019_46416_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4bd/6639257/08137d9fd8e5/41598_2019_46416_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4bd/6639257/4c656d4e494b/41598_2019_46416_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4bd/6639257/4f1530d8b63a/41598_2019_46416_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4bd/6639257/1dcd5fc37b06/41598_2019_46416_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4bd/6639257/08137d9fd8e5/41598_2019_46416_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4bd/6639257/4c656d4e494b/41598_2019_46416_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4bd/6639257/4f1530d8b63a/41598_2019_46416_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Speech, movement, and gaze behaviours during dyadic conversation in noise.在噪声环境中的双人对话中的言语、动作和注视行为。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 18;9(1):10451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46416-0.
2
Synchrony as a measure of conversation difficulty: Movement coherence increases with background noise level and complexity in dyads and triads.同步性作为对话难度的一种衡量指标:在二元组和三元组中,动作连贯性会随着背景噪音水平和复杂性的增加而提高。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 5;16(10):e0258247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258247. eCollection 2021.
3
Conversation in small groups: Speaking and listening strategies depend on the complexities of the environment and group.小组对话:说话和倾听策略取决于环境和群体的复杂性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):632-640. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01821-9. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
4
Influence of surgical and N95 face masks on speech perception and listening effort in noise.手术口罩和 N95 口罩对噪声环境下言语感知和听力努力的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253874. eCollection 2021.
5
Behavioral dynamics of conversation, (mis)communication and coordination in noisy environments.在嘈杂环境中会话、(误)通信和协调的行为动态。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 20;13(1):20271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47396-y.
6
Gaze aversion to stuttered speech: a pilot study investigating differential visual attention to stuttered and fluent speech.对口吃言语的回避注视:一项对视口吃和流畅言语的差异视觉注意的初步研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010 Mar-Apr;45(2):133-44. doi: 10.3109/13682820902763951.
7
Investigating conversational dynamics in triads: Effects of noise, hearing impairment, and hearing aids.三人小组对话动态研究:噪音、听力障碍及助听器的影响
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 12;15:1289637. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1289637. eCollection 2024.
8
The effect of varying talker identity and listening conditions on gaze behavior during audiovisual speech perception.不同说话者身份和聆听条件对视听言语感知过程中注视行为的影响。
Brain Res. 2008 Nov 25;1242:162-71. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.083. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
9
Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.真实环境信噪比特征及中老年轻-中度听力损失患者的言语聆听情况。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):293-304. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000486.
10
Hearing Impairment Increases Communication Effort During Conversations in Noise.听力障碍会增加噪声环境下对话的交流努力。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Dec 17;63(1):305-320. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00201. Print 2020 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Audio-Visual Speech Synchrony Impacts Gaze Patterns in Autism.视听语音同步影响自闭症患者的注视模式。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06998-3.
2
Seeing a Talker's Mouth Reduces the Effort of Perceiving Speech and Repairing Perceptual Mistakes for Listeners With Cochlear Implants.看到说话者的嘴部动作可减轻人工耳蜗佩戴者感知语音和纠正感知错误的难度。
Ear Hear. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001683.
3
Speech-reading on the lips as a cognitive resource to understand speech in noise.通过唇读作为一种认知资源来理解噪声环境中的言语。

本文引用的文献

1
Turn an Ear to Hear: How Hearing-Impaired Listeners Can Exploit Head Orientation to Enhance Their Speech Intelligibility in Noisy Social Settings.侧耳倾听:听力受损的听众如何利用头部方向来提高在嘈杂社交环境中的言语可懂度。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518802701. doi: 10.1177/2331216518802701.
2
Real-time estimation of horizontal gaze angle by saccade integration using in-ear electrooculography.使用耳内眼电图通过扫视积分实时估计水平注视角度。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0190420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190420. eCollection 2018.
3
The benefit of head orientation to speech intelligibility in noise.
Exp Brain Res. 2025 May 31;243(7):163. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07117-5.
4
Pupil Responses During Interactive Conversation.互动对话期间的瞳孔反应。
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251342441. doi: 10.1177/23312165251342441. Epub 2025 May 14.
5
How Purposeful Adaptive Responses to Adverse Conditions Facilitate Successful Auditory Functioning: A Conceptual Model.对不利条件的有目的适应性反应如何促进听觉功能的成功实现:一个概念模型。
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251317010. doi: 10.1177/23312165251317010. Epub 2025 Mar 16.
6
The Effect of Collaborative Triadic Conversations in Noise on Decision-Making in a General-Knowledge Task.噪声环境下协作性三方对话对常识任务决策的影响
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241305058. doi: 10.1177/23312165241305058.
7
Acoustic scene complexity affects motion behavior during speech perception in audio-visual multi-talker virtual environments.听觉场景复杂性会影响视听多说话人虚拟环境中言语感知过程中的运动行为。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 16;14(1):19028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70026-0.
8
Behavioral dynamics of conversation, (mis)communication and coordination in noisy environments.在嘈杂环境中会话、(误)通信和协调的行为动态。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 20;13(1):20271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47396-y.
9
The Role of Talking Faces in Infant Language Learning: Mind the Gap between Screen-Based Settings and Real-Life Communicative Interactions.会说话的面孔在婴儿语言学习中的作用:注意基于屏幕的环境与现实生活交流互动之间的差距。
Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 5;13(8):1167. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13081167.
10
Event-Related Potentials in Assessing Visual Speech Cues in the Broader Autism Phenotype: Evidence from a Phonemic Restoration Paradigm.评估泛自闭症表型中视觉言语线索时的事件相关电位:来自音素恢复范式的证据
Brain Sci. 2023 Jun 30;13(7):1011. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13071011.
头部朝向对噪声环境中言语可懂度的益处。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Feb;139(2):703-12. doi: 10.1121/1.4941655.
4
The just-noticeable difference in speech-to-noise ratio.言语可听度的最小可觉差。
Trends Hear. 2015 Feb 12;19:2331216515572316. doi: 10.1177/2331216515572316.
5
On the relationship of online and offline social cognition.在线和离线社会认知的关系。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 6;8:278. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00278. eCollection 2014.
6
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.在个体内设计中使用置信区间。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03210951.
7
Undirected head movements of listeners with asymmetrical hearing impairment during a speech-in-noise task.听障患者在噪声环境下言语任务中进行无方向头部运动。
Hear Res. 2012 Jan;283(1-2):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.10.009. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
8
Revision and validation of a binaural model for speech intelligibility in noise.双耳模型在噪声环境下言语可懂度的修正和验证。
Hear Res. 2011 May;275(1-2):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.12.005. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
9
Influence of sound immersion and communicative interaction on the Lombard effect.声音沉浸和交际互动对 Lombard 效应的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Jun;53(3):588-608. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0138). Epub 2009 Dec 14.
10
Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation.对话中轮流发言的普遍性与文化差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 30;106(26):10587-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903616106. Epub 2009 Jun 24.