回复对 Maani Hessari、N.；范·沙尔维克，M.C.；托马斯，S.；佩蒂格鲁，M.的评论：酒精行业企业社会责任组织：它们的推特活动能告诉我们什么关于它们的独立性和优先事项？一项比较分析。2019 年，892 页。
Reply to Comment on Maani Hessari, N.; van Schalkwyk, M.C.; Thomas, S.; Petticrew, M. Alcohol Industry CSR Organisations: What Can Their Twitter Activity Tell Us about Their Independence and Their Priorities? A Comparative Analysis. 2019, , 892.
机构信息
Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; London WC1H 9SH, UK.
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 6RP, UK.
出版信息
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 18;16(14):2576. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142576.
Abstract
We are grateful for the opportunity to respond to the letter from the DrinkAware medical advisory panel [...].
摘要
我们很感谢有机会回复 DrinkAware 医疗顾问小组的来信[...]。
相似文献
1
Reply to Comment on Maani Hessari, N.; van Schalkwyk, M.C.; Thomas, S.; Petticrew, M. Alcohol Industry CSR Organisations: What Can Their Twitter Activity Tell Us about Their Independence and Their Priorities? A Comparative Analysis. 2019, , 892.回复对 Maani Hessari、N.；范·沙尔维克，M.C.；托马斯，S.；佩蒂格鲁，M.的评论：酒精行业企业社会责任组织：它们的推特活动能告诉我们什么关于它们的独立性和优先事项？一项比较分析。2019 年，892 页。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 18;16(14):2576. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142576.
2
Comment on MaaniHessari, N.; van Schalkwyk, M.C.; Thomas, S.; Petticrew, M. Alcohol Industry CSR Organisations: What Can Their Twitter Activity Tell Us about Their Independence and Their Priorities? A Comparative Analysis. 2019, , 892.评论 MaaniHessari，N.；van Schalkwyk，M.C.；Thomas，S.；Petticrew，M. 酒精行业企业社会责任组织：他们的推特活动能告诉我们什么关于他们的独立性和优先事项？一项比较分析。2019 年， ，892.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 8;16(13):2421. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132421.
3
Alcohol Industry CSR Organisations: What Can Their Twitter Activity Tell Us about Their Independence and Their Priorities? A Comparative Analysis.酒精行业企业社会责任组织：它们的推特活动能告诉我们什么关于它们的独立性和优先事项？一项比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 12;16(5):892. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050892.
4
Reply to Moretti et al. Would Moving Forward Mean Going Back? Comment on "Maselli et al. Direct Access to Physical Therapy: Should Italy Move Forward? 2022, , 555".回复 Moretti 等人：向前推进是否意味着倒退？评“Maselli 等人：物理治疗的直接通道：意大利是否应该向前推进？2022 年，……，555”。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4620. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084620.
5
Reply to Comment on Di Marco, N., Kaufman, J., Rodda, C.P. Shedding Light on Vitamin D Status and Its Complexities during Pregnancy, Infancy and Childhood: An Australian Perspective. 2019, (4), 538, doi:10.3390/ijerph16040538.回复对 Di Marco、N.、 Kaufman、J. 和 Rodda、C.P. 的评论：揭示澳大利亚视角下孕妇、婴儿和儿童维生素 D 状态及其复杂性。2019, (4), 538, doi:10.3390/ijerph16040538.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 6;16(9):1576. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091576.
6
Reply to Ngoh et al. Comment on "Surendran et al. The Missed Opportunity of Patient-Centered Medical Homes to Thrive in an Asian Context. 2021, , 1817".回复 Ngoh 等人对“Surendran 等人：以患者为中心的医疗之家在亚洲背景下未能蓬勃发展的错失机会。2021 年， ，1817”的评论。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 13;19(8):4686. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084686.
7
Reply to Laby, D.M.; Appelbaum, L.G. Comment on "Nascimento et al. Citations Network Analysis of Vision and Sport. 2020, , 7574".回复 Laby, D.M.; Appelbaum, L.G. 对“Nascimento 等人。视力与运动的引文网络分析。2020 年，，7574”的评论。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 17;18(12):6521. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126521.
8
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信：职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
9
Reply to Learning by Doing….Errors! Comment on Gil-Lacruz, M.; Gracia-Pérez, M.L.; Gil-Lacruz, A.I. Learning by Doing and Training Satisfaction: An Evaluation by Health Care Professionals. 2019, , 1397.回复“从做中学……错误！”：对 Gil-Lacruz, M.; Gracia-Pérez, M.L.; Gil-Lacruz, A.I. 的评论“从做中学和培训满意度：对医疗保健专业人员的评估”。2019 年，，1397.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 19;17(1):38. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010038.
10
Reply to Comment on Cobo-Cuenca, A.I.; Laredo-Aguilera, J.A.; Rodríguez-Borrego, M.-A.; Santacruz-Salas, E.; Carmona-Torres, J.M. Temporal Trends in Fecal Occult Blood Test: Associated Factors (2009-2017). 2019, , 2120.回复对 Cobo-Cuenca, A.I.; Laredo-Aguilera, J.A.; Rodríguez-Borrego, M.-A.; Santacruz-Salas, E.; Carmona-Torres, J.M. 的评论：粪便潜血试验的时间趋势：相关因素（2009-2017）。2019 年， ，2120.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 10;16(24):5014. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245014.
本文引用的文献
1
Is the alcohol industry doing well by 'doing good'? Findings from a content analysis of the alcohol industry's actions to reduce harmful drinking.酒精行业通过“做好事”就能发展良好吗？对酒精行业减少有害饮酒行为的内容分析结果
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 24;8(10):e024325. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024325.
2
Alcohol industry involvement in science: A systematic review of the perspectives of the alcohol research community.酒精行业对科学的介入：酒精研究界观点的系统综述。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Jul;37(5):565-579. doi: 10.1111/dar.12826. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
3
Alcohol industry corporate social responsibility initiatives and harmful drinking: a systematic review.酒精行业企业社会责任倡议与有害饮酒：系统评价。
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Aug 1;28(4):664-673. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky065.
4
Alcohol industry involvement in policymaking: a systematic review.酒精行业对政策制定的参与：一项系统综述。
Addiction. 2018 Mar 15;113(9):1571-84. doi: 10.1111/add.14216.
5
The strategies of alcohol industry SAPROs: Inaccurate information, misleading language and the use of confounders to downplay and misrepresent the risk of cancer.酒精行业社会责任项目的策略：不准确的信息、误导性语言以及利用混淆因素淡化和歪曲癌症风险。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Mar;37(3):313-315. doi: 10.1111/dar.12677. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
6
How alcohol industry organisations mislead the public about alcohol and cancer.酒精行业组织如何误导公众对酒精与癌症的认识。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Mar;37(3):293-303. doi: 10.1111/dar.12596. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
7
What does the alcohol industry mean by 'Responsible drinking'? A comparative analysis.酒精行业所说的“负责任饮酒”是什么意思？一项比较分析。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Mar 1;40(1):90-97. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx040.
8
Industry sponsorship and research outcome.行业赞助与研究成果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 16;2(2):MR000033. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub3.
9
A rapid evidence review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alcohol control policies: an English perspective.从英文视角看，酒精控制政策的有效性和成本效益的快速证据审查。
Lancet. 2017 Apr 15;389(10078):1558-1580. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32420-5. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
10
How the alcohol industry relies on harmful use of alcohol and works to protect its profits.酒精行业如何依赖有害饮酒行为并努力保护其利润。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2016 Nov;35(6):661-664. doi: 10.1111/dar.12460. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
Zotero 插件