• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《ICD-11 人格量表的六个月稳定性和预测效度》。

Six-month stability and predictive validity of the personality inventory for ICD-11.

机构信息

Psychology Department, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Faculty of Social Sciences and Cultural Studies, University of Applied Sciences Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2022 Nov 16;10(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00979-2.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-022-00979-2
PMID:36384683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9670366/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) personality disorder model comprises, among other elements, five maladaptive personality trait domains (negative affectivity, detachment, dissociality, disinhibition, anankastia). Recently, the personality inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) has emerged as one of the most widely used measures of these ICD-11 personality trait domains.

METHODS

The current study contributed to the validation of the PiCD validation by exploring its stability and predictive links with psychological distress over 6 months in a sample of 206 German community adults.

RESULTS

The PiCD trait domain scales displayed strong differential (all r ≥ .80) and absolute stability (all |d| ≤ .09). Additionally, PiCD negative affectivity predicted depression, anxiety, and stress, and PiCD detachment predicted depression over 6 months beyond baseline.

CONCLUSION

In sum, this study demonstrated the stability of the PiCD trait domain scores, supporting their utility for capturing relatively stable traits as described in the ICD-11. Additionally, we provided the first evidence for the predictive validity of some of the PiCD trait domain scores.

摘要

背景

国际疾病分类第 11 次修订版(ICD-11)人格障碍模型包括五个适应不良的人格特质领域(负性情绪、脱抑、反社会、冲动和强迫)。最近,人格障碍诊断问卷第 11 版(PiCD)作为这些 ICD-11 人格特质领域的最广泛使用的测量工具之一而出现。

方法

本研究通过探索 PiCD 特质在德国社区 206 名成年人样本中的稳定性及其与 6 个月心理困扰的预测性联系,为 PiCD 的验证做出了贡献。

结果

PiCD 特质领域量表显示出很强的差异(所有 r≥.80)和绝对稳定性(所有 |d|≤.09)。此外,PiCD 的负性情绪预测了抑郁、焦虑和压力,PiCD 的脱抑预测了抑郁,这些预测在 6 个月内超过了基线。

结论

总之,本研究表明 PiCD 特质领域分数的稳定性,支持了它们在描述 ICD-11 中相对稳定的特质方面的实用性。此外,我们提供了 PiCD 特质领域分数的一些预测有效性的初步证据。

相似文献

1
Six-month stability and predictive validity of the personality inventory for ICD-11.《ICD-11 人格量表的六个月稳定性和预测效度》。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Nov 16;10(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00979-2.
2
Personality Disorders in the ICD-11: Spanish Validation of the PiCD and the SASPD in a Mixed Community and Clinical Sample.《国际疾病分类第11版》中的人格障碍:PiCD和SASPD在混合社区与临床样本中的西班牙语验证
Assessment. 2021 Apr;28(3):759-772. doi: 10.1177/1073191120936357. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
3
[The Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD): Reliability and Validity of the German Version in a Clinical and Non-Clinical Sample].[国际疾病分类第11版人格量表(PiCD):德文版在临床和非临床样本中的信度和效度]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2023 Feb;73(2):62-69. doi: 10.1055/a-1826-1888. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
4
Assessment of personality disorder in the ICD-11 diagnostic system: Polish validation of the Personality Inventory for ICD-11.《ICD-11 诊断系统中人格障碍的评估:ICD-11 人格量表的波兰验证》
Psychiatr Pol. 2022 Dec 31;56(6):1185-1202. doi: 10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/138563.
5
The Personality Inventory for ICD-11: Investigating reliability, structural and concurrent validity, and method variance.《ICD-11 人格量表:信度、结构和同时效度以及方法偏差的研究》
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):8-17. doi: 10.1037/pas0000776. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
6
Alignment of the personality inventory for ICD-11 with the five-factor model of personality.与人格五因素模型的 ICD-11 人格量表的对齐。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Jul;34(7):711-716. doi: 10.1037/pas0001141. Epub 2022 May 5.
7
Reliability and construct validity of the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) in Italian adult participants.《国际疾病分类第 11 版人格障碍检查表(PiCD)》在意大利成年参与者中的信度和构念效度。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):29-39. doi: 10.1037/pas0000766. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
8
Structure of clinician-reported ICD-11 personality disorder trait qualifiers.临床医生报告的 ICD-11 人格障碍特质修饰语的结构。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):50-59. doi: 10.1037/pas0000747. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
9
ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5 人格特质领域能否涵盖类别性人格障碍:寻找共同点》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):425-434. doi: 10.1177/0004867417727867. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
10
Two-year retest reliability and predictive validity of the Self- and Informant-Personality Inventory for ICD-11 in older adults.《用于老年人群的 ICD-11 自陈式和知情者人格量表的两年重测信度和预测效度》
Psychol Assess. 2024 Jun-Jul;36(6-7):433-439. doi: 10.1037/pas0001316. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
[The Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD): Reliability and Validity of the German Version in a Clinical and Non-Clinical Sample].[国际疾病分类第11版人格量表(PiCD):德文版在临床和非临床样本中的信度和效度]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2023 Feb;73(2):62-69. doi: 10.1055/a-1826-1888. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
2
The prognostic utility of personality traits versus past psychiatric diagnoses: Predicting future mental health and functioning.人格特质与既往精神科诊断的预后效用:预测未来心理健康及功能状况
Clin Psychol Sci. 2022 Jul;10(4):734-751. doi: 10.1177/21677026211056596. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
3
Alignment of the personality inventory for ICD-11 with the five-factor model of personality.与人格五因素模型的 ICD-11 人格量表的对齐。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Jul;34(7):711-716. doi: 10.1037/pas0001141. Epub 2022 May 5.
4
Preliminary Scales for Personality Disorder: Self and Interpersonal Dysfunction Plus Five Personality Disorder Trait Domains.人格障碍初步量表:自我与人际功能障碍加五个人格障碍特质领域
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 12;12:668724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668724. eCollection 2021.
5
Development and initial evaluation of the ICD-11 personality disorder severity scale: PDS-ICD-11.《ICD-11 人格障碍严重程度量表的制定与初步评估:PDS-ICD-11》。
Personal Ment Health. 2021 Aug;15(3):223-236. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1510. Epub 2021 May 17.
6
The self- and informant-personality inventories for ICD-11: Agreement, structure, and relations with health, social, and satisfaction variables in older adults.《ICD-11 自陈式和知情者式人格量表:老年人健康、社会和满意度变量的一致性、结构和关系》
Psychol Assess. 2021 Apr;33(4):300-310. doi: 10.1037/pas0000982. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
7
Incremental validity of the ICD-11 personality disorder model for explaining psychological distress.国际疾病分类第11版人格障碍模型在解释心理困扰方面的增量效度。
Personal Disord. 2022 Mar;13(2):97-107. doi: 10.1037/per0000489. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
8
Psychological correlates of COVID-19 pandemic in the Austrian population.奥地利人群中 COVID-19 大流行的心理相关因素。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 14;20(1):1395. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09489-5.
9
Testing explanatory models of the interplay between depression, neuroticism, and stressful life events: a dynamic trait-stress generation approach.测试抑郁、神经质和生活压力事件相互作用的解释模型:一种动态特质-应激产生方法。
Psychol Med. 2020 Dec;50(16):2780-2789. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002927. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
10
Reliability and construct validity of the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) in Italian adult participants.《国际疾病分类第 11 版人格障碍检查表(PiCD)》在意大利成年参与者中的信度和构念效度。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):29-39. doi: 10.1037/pas0000766. Epub 2019 Aug 15.