University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States.
Northwestern University, United States.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Jun;33:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
This article synthesizes recent psychological research at the intersection of power, status, and culture. Our review shows that culture affects how status and power are conceptualized, who attains them, and what their consequences are. In individualistic cultures (and particularly vertical ones that emphasize hierarchical arrangements), power is conceptualized in personalized terms (i.e. focus on self-benefits), competence drives status attainment, norm violations increase power, and individuals strive primarily for power, approve of powerholders that behave equitably, and feel happy when they have personal power. In contrast, in collectivistic cultures (and particularly horizontal ones that promote egalitarianism), power is conceptualized in socialized terms (i.e. focus on benefitting others), warmth and competence drive status attainment, norm adherence increases power, and individuals strive primarily for status, approve of powerholders that behave compassionately, and feel happy when they have socialized power. We discuss what remains unknown as a mechanism for guiding future work.
本文综合了近期权力、地位和文化交叉领域的心理学研究。我们的综述表明,文化影响了地位和权力的概念化方式、谁能获得这些概念,以及它们的后果。在个人主义文化中(尤其是强调等级制度的垂直文化),权力被个性化地概念化(即关注自我利益),能力决定地位的获得,违反规范会增加权力,个人主要追求权力,认可公平行事的权力持有者,并在拥有个人权力时感到快乐。相比之下,在集体主义文化中(尤其是促进平等主义的水平文化),权力被社会化地概念化(即关注使他人受益),温暖和能力决定地位的获得,遵守规范会增加权力,个人主要追求地位,认可富有同情心的权力持有者,并在拥有社会化权力时感到快乐。我们讨论了作为指导未来工作的机制仍然未知的内容。