Vázquez-Diz Juan A, Morillo-Baro Juan P, Reigal Rafael E, Morales-Sánchez Verónica, Hernández-Mendo Antonio
University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Departamento Psicología Social, Trabajo Social, Antropología Social y Estudios de Asia Oriental, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 12;10:1627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01627. eCollection 2019.
The aim of this research was to analyze decision making of the specialist in beach handball in the framework of mixed methods, and through the observation of their actions. To do this, and distinguishing it by genre, an analysis of polar coordinates was realized using the assist and completion of this specific position as behavior criteria. A total of 24 sessions were observed with the HOISAN computer software, using an design tool. Observation design used was nomothetic, punctual, and multidimensional. The obtained results showed significant relations between the behavior criteria and conditional behaviors (pairing), showing significant relations different for male and female categories. Significant differences were estimated statistically about the importance of the specialist in the development of the static attack in beach handball and their influence in the final result of the match, based on their greater or lesser success in decision making. In the male category it is highlighted that the specialist's assists are not positively related to a favorable score and that the attack usually ends up in the central areas against closed defensive systems; in addition, their successful completion decisions are produced by means of launches in the central zone, also against closed defensive systems; however, in the female category, specialists' assists lead to end the attacks in flight on the far right against open defensive systems.
本研究的目的是在混合方法的框架内,通过观察沙滩手球专家的行为来分析其决策过程。为此,通过将特定位置的协助和完成情况作为行为标准,按性别区分,对极坐标进行了分析。使用HOISAN计算机软件,借助一种设计工具,共观察了24场比赛。所采用的观察设计是通则性、即时性和多维度的。所得结果表明,行为标准与条件行为(配对)之间存在显著关系,且男女类别之间的显著关系有所不同。基于专家在决策方面的成败,就沙滩手球静态进攻发展中专家的重要性及其对比赛最终结果的影响进行了统计估计,存在显著差异。在男性类别中,突出的是专家的协助与有利得分没有正相关关系,而且进攻通常在面对封闭防守系统时在中区结束;此外,他们成功的完成决策是通过在中区的传球产生的,同样是面对封闭防守系统;然而,在女性类别中,专家的协助导致在面对开放防守系统时在最右侧空中结束进攻。