Suppr超能文献

医疗工作流程中患者对人工智能的使用与控制:基于患者视角的单中心问卷调查研究

Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives.

作者信息

Lennartz Simon, Dratsch Thomas, Zopfs David, Persigehl Thorsten, Maintz David, Große Hokamp Nils, Pinto Dos Santos Daniel

机构信息

Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 17;23(2):e24221. doi: 10.2196/24221.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining increasing importance in many medical specialties, yet data on patients' opinions on the use of AI in medicine are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate patients' opinions on the use of AI in different aspects of the medical workflow and the level of control and supervision under which they would deem the application of AI in medicine acceptable.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging voluntarily participated in an anonymized questionnaire between February 10, 2020, and May 24, 2020. Patient information, confidence in physicians vs AI in different clinical tasks, opinions on the control of AI, preference in cases of disagreement between AI and physicians, and acceptance of the use of AI for diagnosing and treating diseases of different severity were recorded.

RESULTS

In total, 229 patients participated. Patients favored physicians over AI for all clinical tasks except for treatment planning based on current scientific evidence. In case of disagreement between physicians and AI regarding diagnosis and treatment planning, most patients preferred the physician's opinion to AI (96.2% [153/159] vs 3.8% [6/159] and 94.8% [146/154] vs 5.2% [8/154], respectively; P=.001). AI supervised by a physician was considered more acceptable than AI without physician supervision at diagnosis (confidence rating 3.90 [SD 1.20] vs 1.64 [SD 1.03], respectively; P=.001) and therapy (3.77 [SD 1.18] vs 1.57 [SD 0.96], respectively; P=.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients favored physicians over AI in most clinical tasks and strongly preferred an application of AI with physician supervision. However, patients acknowledged that AI could help physicians integrate the most recent scientific evidence into medical care. Application of AI in medicine should be disclosed and controlled to protect patient interests and meet ethical standards.

摘要

背景

人工智能(AI)在许多医学专科中日益重要,但关于患者对医学中使用AI的看法的数据却很少。

目的

本研究旨在调查患者对AI在医疗工作流程不同方面的使用看法,以及他们认为医学中AI应用可接受的控制和监督水平。

方法

计划进行计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像的患者在2020年2月10日至2020年5月24日期间自愿参与了一项匿名问卷调查。记录了患者信息、在不同临床任务中对医生与AI的信心、对AI控制的看法、在AI与医生意见不一致情况下的偏好,以及对使用AI诊断和治疗不同严重程度疾病的接受程度。

结果

共有229名患者参与。除了基于当前科学证据的治疗计划外,在所有临床任务中患者都更青睐医生而非AI。在医生和AI在诊断和治疗计划上存在分歧的情况下,大多数患者更倾向于医生的意见而非AI(分别为96.2%[153/159]对3.8%[6/159]和94.8%[146/154]对5.2%[8/154];P = 0.001)。在诊断时,由医生监督的AI比无医生监督的AI更易被接受(信心评分分别为3.90[标准差1.20]对1.64[标准差1.03];P = 0.001),在治疗时也是如此(分别为3.77[标准差1.18]对1.57[标准差0.96];P = 0.001)。

结论

在大多数临床任务中患者更青睐医生而非AI,并且强烈倾向于在医生监督下应用AI。然而,患者承认AI可以帮助医生将最新科学证据整合到医疗中。医学中AI的应用应予以披露和控制,以保护患者利益并符合伦理标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/844b/7929746/87bf9fcfcbda/jmir_v23i2e24221_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验