Suppr超能文献

标准化视频面试与急诊医学中专业素养和人际沟通技能面试评估的比较

Comparison of the Standardized Video Interview and Interview Assessments of Professionalism and Interpersonal Communication Skills in Emergency Medicine.

作者信息

Hopson Laura R, Dorfsman Michele L, Branzetti Jeremy, Gisondi Michael A, Hart Danielle, Jordan Jaime, Cranford James A, Williams Sarah R, Regan Linda

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor MI.

Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA.

出版信息

AEM Educ Train. 2019 May 20;3(3):259-268. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10346. eCollection 2019 Jul.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Association of American Medical Colleges Standardized Video Interview (SVI) was recently added as a component of emergency medicine (EM) residency applications to provide additional information about interpersonal communication skills (ICS) and knowledge of professionalism (PROF) behaviors. Our objective was to ascertain the correlation between the SVI and residency interviewer assessments of PROF and ICS. Secondary objectives included examination of 1) inter- and intrainstitutional assessments of ICS and PROF, 2) correlation of SVI scores with rank order list (ROL) positions, and 3) the potential influence of gender on interview day assessments.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study using prospectively collected data from seven EM residency programs during 2017 and 2018 using a standardized instrument. Correlations between interview day PROF/ICS scores and the SVI were tested. A one-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the association of SVI and ROL position. Gender differences were assessed with independent-groups t-tests.

RESULTS

A total of 1,264 interview-day encounters from 773 unique applicants resulted in 4,854 interviews conducted by 151 interviewers. Both PROF and ICS demonstrated a small positive correlation with the SVI score (r = 0.16 and r = 0.17, respectively). ROL position was associated with SVI score (p0.001), with mean SVI scores for top-, middle-, and bottom-third applicants being 20.9, 20.5, and 19.8, respectively. No group differences with gender were identified on assessments of PROF or ICS.

CONCLUSIONS

Interview assessments of PROF and ICS have a small, positive correlation with SVI scores. These residency selection tools may be measuring related, but not redundant, applicant characteristics. We did not identify gender differences in interview assessments.

摘要

目的

美国医学院协会标准化视频面试(SVI)最近被纳入急诊医学(EM)住院医师申请流程,以提供有关人际沟通技巧(ICS)和职业素养(PROF)行为知识的更多信息。我们的目的是确定SVI与住院医师面试官对PROF和ICS的评估之间的相关性。次要目的包括:1)机构间和机构内对ICS和PROF的评估;2)SVI分数与排名顺序表(ROL)位置的相关性;3)性别对面试日评估的潜在影响。

方法

我们进行了一项观察性研究,使用标准化工具前瞻性收集了2017年和2018年期间七个EM住院医师项目的数据。测试了面试日PROF/ICS分数与SVI之间的相关性。采用单因素方差分析来分析SVI与ROL位置的关联。使用独立样本t检验评估性别差异。

结果

来自773名独特申请人的总共1264次面试日会面,由151名面试官进行了4854次面试。PROF和ICS与SVI分数均呈小的正相关(分别为r = 0.16和r = 0.17)。ROL位置与SVI分数相关(p<0.001),排名前三分之一、中间三分之一和后三分之一申请人的平均SVI分数分别为20.9、20.5和19.8。在PROF或ICS评估中未发现性别差异。

结论

PROF和ICS的面试评估与SVI分数呈小的正相关。这些住院医师选拔工具可能在衡量相关但非冗余的申请人特征。我们在面试评估中未发现性别差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验