Leiden University, Institute for Psychological Research & Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Oct;144:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
Converging evidence seems to suggest that affect and cognitive control are related in interesting ways, and some researchers have suggested that affect may play a causal, or at least otherwise interesting role in cognitive control. Here I discuss reasons to believe that these claims are either unfounded or based on a conceptual misunderstanding. They are unfounded with respect to the role of conscious affective experience, which is not supported by any unequivocal evidence. And they are based on a conceptual misunderstanding with respect to unconscious affect: Given the strong conceptual overlap between affect on the one hand and cognitive control on the other, finding mechanisms that are shared by affect and control is an almost necessary outcome that does not provide any mechanistic insight but merely reflects the semantic overlap between the concepts. However, this overlap may be taken to expand our research perspective and take affect-related and control-related outcomes as equivalent markers of one underlying function that encompasses, and thus goes beyond the traditional concept of affect and control.
越来越多的证据似乎表明,情感和认知控制以有趣的方式相互关联,一些研究人员认为,情感可能在认知控制中起因果作用,或者至少是一个有趣的因素。在这里,我讨论了一些理由,这些理由表明这些说法要么没有根据,要么基于概念上的误解。就有意识的情感体验而言,这些说法没有根据,因为没有任何明确的证据支持有意识的情感体验的作用。而且,这些说法也基于对无意识情感的概念性误解:鉴于情感和认知控制在概念上有很强的重叠,发现情感和控制共有的机制几乎是必然的结果,它并没有提供任何机械性的见解,而只是反映了概念之间的语义重叠。然而,这种重叠可以被用来扩展我们的研究视角,将与情感相关和与控制相关的结果视为一个涵盖传统情感和控制概念的潜在功能的等效标记。