• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

猪骨前外侧韧带重建中不同胫骨固定方法的生物力学评估

Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Tibial Fixation Methods in the Reconstruction of the Anterolateral Ligament in Swine Bones.

作者信息

Costa Rogério Nascimento, Nadal Rubens Rosso, Saggin Paulo Renato Fernandes, Lopes Junior Osmar Valadão, Spinelli Leandro de Freitas, Israel Charles Leonardo

机构信息

Serviço de Cirurgia do Joelho, Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brasil.

Laboratório de Bioengenharia, Biomecânica e Biomateriais, Universidade de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 Apr;54(2):183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.rbo.2017.09.001. Epub 2019 May 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.rbo.2017.09.001
PMID:31363265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6529319/
Abstract

The present study aims to evaluate different methods of tibial fixation in the reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament (ALL). In addition, the present paper aims to compare the effectiveness of these methods and their mechanisms of failure in swine knees.  A total of 40 freshly frozen swine limbs were divided into 4 groups of 10 specimens, according to the tibial fixation technique used. In group A, the tibial fixation of the tendon graft was made through an anchor passing the graft. In group B, the tibial fixation was performed through a metal interference screw in a single bone tunnel. In group C, the tibial fixation included an anchor associated with a tendinous suture (but not with a wire crossing the tendon). In group D, two confluent bony tunnels were drilled and combined with an interference screw in one of them.  The lowest mean force (70.56 N) was observed in group A, and the highest mean force (244.85 N) was observed in group B; the mean values in the other 2 groups ranged from 171.68 N (group C) to 149.43 N (group D). Considering the margin of error (5%), there was a significant difference between the groups (  < 0.001).  Fixation with an interference screw in a single tunnel bone showed the highest tensile strength among the evaluated techniques.

摘要

本研究旨在评估前外侧韧带(ALL)重建术中不同的胫骨固定方法。此外,本文旨在比较这些方法在猪膝关节中的有效性及其失效机制。

总共40个新鲜冷冻的猪肢体根据所使用的胫骨固定技术分为4组,每组10个标本。A组中,肌腱移植物的胫骨固定通过穿过移植物的锚钉进行。B组中,通过单骨隧道内的金属挤压螺钉进行胫骨固定。C组中,胫骨固定包括一个与肌腱缝线相关的锚钉(但不与穿过肌腱的钢丝相关)。D组中,钻出两个汇合的骨隧道,并在其中一个隧道中结合挤压螺钉。

A组观察到的平均力最低(70.56 N),B组观察到的平均力最高(244.85 N);其他两组的平均值介于171.68 N(C组)至149.43 N(D组)之间。考虑到误差范围(5%),各组之间存在显著差异(<0.001)。

在评估的技术中,单隧道骨内使用挤压螺钉固定显示出最高的拉伸强度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/8cbc49fb6b4b/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224pt-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/645ff249b612/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/6e7159659f3c/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224en-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/29e3788bebb9/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224en-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/0d1818f805c1/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224en-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/3c530cc6bb37/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224en-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/c9832ed12455/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/f6b17a564590/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224pt-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/b500a717bfb5/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224pt-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/6b3a1e8b93cf/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224pt-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/8cbc49fb6b4b/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224pt-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/645ff249b612/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/6e7159659f3c/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224en-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/29e3788bebb9/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224en-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/0d1818f805c1/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224en-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/3c530cc6bb37/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224en-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/c9832ed12455/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/f6b17a564590/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224pt-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/b500a717bfb5/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224pt-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/6b3a1e8b93cf/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224pt-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6945/6529319/8cbc49fb6b4b/10-1016-j-rbo-2017-09-001-i170224pt-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Tibial Fixation Methods in the Reconstruction of the Anterolateral Ligament in Swine Bones.猪骨前外侧韧带重建中不同胫骨固定方法的生物力学评估
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 Apr;54(2):183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.rbo.2017.09.001. Epub 2019 May 10.
2
Biomechanical comparison of Tibial-sided supplemental fixation techniques in Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.骨-髌腱-骨前交叉韧带重建中胫骨侧补充固定技术的生物力学比较。
Knee. 2023 Mar;41:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.12.005. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
3
Pullout strength of tibial graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with a patellar tendon graft: interference screw versus staple fixation in human knees.髌腱移植重建前交叉韧带时胫骨移植固定的拔出强度:人膝关节中干涉螺钉与U形钉固定的比较
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5(2):84-8. doi: 10.1007/s001670050032.
4
Biomechanical comparison of patellar fixation techniques in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.髌股内侧韧带重建中髌骨固定技术的生物力学比较
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):195-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546514550992. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
5
[Resilience of tibial transplant fixation for replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament. Interference screws vs. staples].[用于前交叉韧带置换的胫骨移植固定的稳定性。干涉螺钉与钉书钉的比较]
Unfallchirurg. 1998 Mar;101(3):204-8. doi: 10.1007/s001130050255.
6
Influence of Different Tibial Fixation Techniques on Initial Stability in Single-Stage Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision With Confluent Tibial Tunnels: A Biomechanical Laboratory Study.不同胫骨固定技术对单阶段前交叉韧带翻修术中融合胫骨隧道初始稳定性的影响:一项生物力学实验室研究
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jan;32(1):78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.044. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
7
A comparison of the fixation strengths provided by different intraosseous tendon lengths during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in a porcine tibial model.前交叉韧带重建术中不同骨内肌腱长度提供的固定强度比较:猪胫骨模型的生物力学研究
Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Jun;6(2):173-9. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.2.173. Epub 2014 May 16.
8
Interference screw fixation of doubled flexor tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - biomechanical evaluation with cyclic elongation.前交叉韧带重建中双股屈肌腱移植的干涉螺钉固定——循环拉伸的生物力学评估
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2000 Mar;15(3):188-95. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(99)00065-0.
9
Primary stability with tibial press-fit fixation of patellar ligament graft: An experimental study in ovine knees.髌韧带移植胫骨压配固定的初期稳定性:绵羊膝关节的实验研究
Arthroscopy. 2001 Nov-Dec;17(9):963-70. doi: 10.1053/jars.2001.25955.
10
Comparison of screw post fixation and free bone block interference fixation for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts: biomechanical considerations.前交叉韧带软组织移植物的螺钉柱固定与游离骨块干涉固定的比较:生物力学考量
Arthroscopy. 1996 Aug;12(4):470-3. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(96)90042-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Proximal Biceps Tenodesis - Biomechanical Analysis in Sheep: Comparison between Metallic Anchor, Onlay Bioabsorbable Knotless Anchor, and Interference Screw.肱二头肌近端腱固定术——绵羊的生物力学分析:金属锚钉、覆盖式生物可吸收无结锚钉和干涉螺钉之间的比较
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 7;59(5):e758-e764. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768616. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Biomechanical Effects of Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.前交叉韧带重建与外侧韧带重建联合手术的生物力学效应:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jun 24;9(6):23259671211009879. doi: 10.1177/23259671211009879. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Anatomical study on the anterolateral ligament of the knee.膝关节前外侧韧带的解剖学研究
Rev Bras Ortop. 2013 Sep 27;48(4):368-373. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2013.04.007. eCollection 2013 Jul-Aug.
2
Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带与前外侧韧带联合重建
Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Oct 31;5(6):e1253-e1259. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.08.003. eCollection 2016 Dec.
3
Anatomic Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Knee Leads to Overconstraint at Any Fixation Angle.膝关节解剖学前外侧韧带重建在任何固定角度都会导致过度约束。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):2546-2556. doi: 10.1177/0363546516652607. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
4
Biomechanical study of strength and stiffness of the knee anterolateral ligament.膝前外侧韧带强度与刚度的生物力学研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Apr 30;17:193. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1052-5.
5
Fixation of Soft Tissue to Bone: Techniques and Fundamentals.软组织与骨的固定:技术与基础
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Feb;24(2):83-95. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00081.
6
Anatomy and Histology of the Knee Anterolateral Ligament.膝关节前外侧韧带的解剖与组织学。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2013 Dec 9;1(7):2325967113513546. doi: 10.1177/2325967113513546. eCollection 2013 Dec.
7
Combined Intra- and Extra-articular Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: The Reconstruction of the Knee Anterolateral Ligament.前交叉韧带关节内与关节外联合重建:膝关节前外侧韧带重建
Arthrosc Tech. 2015 Jun 1;4(3):e239-44. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2015.02.006. eCollection 2015 Jun.
8
Biomechanical analysis of simulated clinical testing and reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament of the knee.膝关节前外侧韧带模拟临床测试与重建的生物力学分析
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2189-97. doi: 10.1177/0363546515589166. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
9
The Anterolateral Ligament: An Anatomic, Radiographic, and Biomechanical Analysis.前外侧韧带:解剖学、影像学及生物力学分析
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1606-15. doi: 10.1177/0363546515578253. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
10
Outcome of a Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.一种联合前交叉韧带和前外侧韧带重建技术的结果:至少2年随访
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1598-605. doi: 10.1177/0363546515571571. Epub 2015 Mar 4.