Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Tshwane Academic Division, National Health Laboratory Service, Pretoria, South Africa.
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00501-19. Print 2019 Oct.
Colistin has become increasingly important in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Resistance to colistin has emerged globally, necessitating the need for an accurate method to detect colistin resistance. The colistin NP test has shown promise as a rapid screening assay for colistin resistance. This study compared the performance of an in-house-prepared colistin NP test against broth microdilution (BMD) as the gold standard and against Etest (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) as an alternative method. A total of 215 stored isolates were evaluated, of which 159 were resistant and 56 susceptible to colistin by BMD. The categorical agreement of the colistin NP test with BMD was found to be 98.1%, compared to 87.9% for the Etest. One major error was detected with both the colistin NP test and the Etest. Three very major errors were detected with the colistin NP test compared to 25 with the Etest. This resulted in a major error rate of 1.8% for both the colistin NP test and the Etest and a very major error rate of 1.9% and 15.7% for the colistin NP test and the Etest, respectively. The colistin NP test compared satisfactorily to the BMD reference method in determining colistin susceptibility. The colistin NP test is a rapid, inexpensive screening method for colistin resistance, especially in resource-limited settings.
黏菌素在治疗多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌方面变得越来越重要。黏菌素耐药性已经在全球范围内出现,因此需要一种准确的方法来检测黏菌素耐药性。黏菌素 NP 检测已被证明是一种快速筛选黏菌素耐药性的方法。本研究比较了自制黏菌素 NP 检测与肉汤微量稀释法(BMD)作为金标准和 Etest(生物梅里埃,法国马西勒埃托勒)作为替代方法的性能。总共评估了 215 株储存的分离株,其中 159 株通过 BMD 对黏菌素耐药,56 株敏感。与 Etest 相比,黏菌素 NP 检测与 BMD 的分类一致性为 98.1%。两种检测方法都检测到一个主要错误。与 Etest 相比,黏菌素 NP 检测检测到 3 个非常大的错误。这导致黏菌素 NP 检测的主要错误率为 1.8%,Etest 的主要错误率为 15.7%。黏菌素 NP 检测与 BMD 参考方法相比,在确定黏菌素敏感性方面表现令人满意。黏菌素 NP 检测是一种快速、廉价的黏菌素耐药性筛选方法,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。