Suppr超能文献

在资源有限的环境下评估一种自用多粘菌素 NP 检测方法。

Evaluation of an In-House Colistin NP Test for Use in Resource-Limited Settings.

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

Tshwane Academic Division, National Health Laboratory Service, Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00501-19. Print 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Colistin has become increasingly important in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Resistance to colistin has emerged globally, necessitating the need for an accurate method to detect colistin resistance. The colistin NP test has shown promise as a rapid screening assay for colistin resistance. This study compared the performance of an in-house-prepared colistin NP test against broth microdilution (BMD) as the gold standard and against Etest (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) as an alternative method. A total of 215 stored isolates were evaluated, of which 159 were resistant and 56 susceptible to colistin by BMD. The categorical agreement of the colistin NP test with BMD was found to be 98.1%, compared to 87.9% for the Etest. One major error was detected with both the colistin NP test and the Etest. Three very major errors were detected with the colistin NP test compared to 25 with the Etest. This resulted in a major error rate of 1.8% for both the colistin NP test and the Etest and a very major error rate of 1.9% and 15.7% for the colistin NP test and the Etest, respectively. The colistin NP test compared satisfactorily to the BMD reference method in determining colistin susceptibility. The colistin NP test is a rapid, inexpensive screening method for colistin resistance, especially in resource-limited settings.

摘要

黏菌素在治疗多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌方面变得越来越重要。黏菌素耐药性已经在全球范围内出现,因此需要一种准确的方法来检测黏菌素耐药性。黏菌素 NP 检测已被证明是一种快速筛选黏菌素耐药性的方法。本研究比较了自制黏菌素 NP 检测与肉汤微量稀释法(BMD)作为金标准和 Etest(生物梅里埃,法国马西勒埃托勒)作为替代方法的性能。总共评估了 215 株储存的分离株,其中 159 株通过 BMD 对黏菌素耐药,56 株敏感。与 Etest 相比,黏菌素 NP 检测与 BMD 的分类一致性为 98.1%。两种检测方法都检测到一个主要错误。与 Etest 相比,黏菌素 NP 检测检测到 3 个非常大的错误。这导致黏菌素 NP 检测的主要错误率为 1.8%,Etest 的主要错误率为 15.7%。黏菌素 NP 检测与 BMD 参考方法相比,在确定黏菌素敏感性方面表现令人满意。黏菌素 NP 检测是一种快速、廉价的黏菌素耐药性筛选方法,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。

相似文献

9
An Improved Medium for Colistin Susceptibility Testing.改良多粘菌素药敏试验培养基。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Apr 25;56(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01950-17. Print 2018 May.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Towards Understanding MCR-like Colistin Resistance.探索 MCR 样多粘菌素耐药性。
Trends Microbiol. 2018 Sep;26(9):794-808. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验