• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用基于团队的修订方式,帮助医学生为处方安全评估做好准备。

Using team-based revision to prepare medical students for the prescribing safety assessment.

作者信息

Field Samantha M, Burstow Nicholas J, Owen David R, Sam Amir H

机构信息

Medical Education Research Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Jul 10;10:501-506. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S204435. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S204435
PMID:31372086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6628602/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Prescribing Safety Assessment (PSA) is an online assessment of safe and effective prescribing, taken by final-year UK medical students. To prepare students for the PSA, we used a modified form of team-based learning, team-based revision (TBR), in which students consolidate previously learned prescribing knowledge and skills across a broad range of topics. We evaluated students' response to TBR and their perceptions of team working.

METHODS

Eight TBR sessions based on the PSA blueprint were conducted over two days by three faculty members for final year medical students. During TBR sessions, students worked in small groups answering individual multiple-choice questions, followed by group multiple-choice questions. They subsequently answered open-ended questions in their groups, with answers written on a drug chart to increase authenticity. Students completed surveys using Likert-type items to determine views on TBR and their confidence in prescribing.

RESULTS

The majority of respondents agreed that the sessions were useful for preparation both for the PSA (82%) and Foundation Year 1 (78%). 92% agreed that using drug-charts aided learning. Prescribing confidence increased significantly after TBR (median pre-TBR: 2, post-TBR: 5, <0.0001). TBR significantly improved attitudes towards "team experience" (<0.001), "team impact on quality of learning" (<0.01) and "team impact on clinical reasoning ability" (<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Team-based revision is a resource-efficient addition to undergraduate prescribing teaching and can help with preparation for the PSA. A short course of TBR was effective in influencing students' attitudes towards teamwork.

摘要

背景

处方安全评估(PSA)是一项针对英国医学专业最后一年学生的安全有效处方在线评估。为帮助学生准备PSA,我们采用了一种基于团队学习的改进形式——团队复习(TBR),让学生巩固之前在广泛主题中学到的处方知识和技能。我们评估了学生对TBR的反应以及他们对团队协作的看法。

方法

三位教员在两天内为医学专业最后一年的学生举办了八次基于PSA蓝图的TBR课程。在TBR课程中,学生分成小组回答个人多项选择题,然后是小组多项选择题。随后,他们在小组中回答开放式问题,并将答案写在药物图表上以增加真实性。学生使用李克特量表项目完成调查问卷,以确定他们对TBR的看法以及他们在处方方面的信心。

结果

大多数受访者认为这些课程对准备PSA(82%)和第一年基础课程(78%)都很有用。92%的人认为使用药物图表有助于学习。TBR后处方信心显著提高(TBR前中位数:2,TBR后:5,<0.0001)。TBR显著改善了对“团队体验”(<0.001)、“团队对学习质量的影响”(<0.01)和“团队对临床推理能力的影响”(<0.001)的态度。

结论

基于团队的复习是本科处方教学中一种资源高效的补充方式,有助于为PSA做准备。一个简短的TBR课程有效地影响了学生对团队合作的态度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30d8/6628602/1227a9eb6362/AMEP-10-501-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30d8/6628602/1227a9eb6362/AMEP-10-501-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30d8/6628602/1227a9eb6362/AMEP-10-501-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Using team-based revision to prepare medical students for the prescribing safety assessment.采用基于团队的修订方式,帮助医学生为处方安全评估做好准备。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Jul 10;10:501-506. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S204435. eCollection 2019.
2
The role of undergraduate teaching, learning and a national prescribing safety assessment in preparation for practical prescribing: UK medical students' perspective.本科教学、学习和国家处方安全评估在实践处方准备中的作用:英国医学生的观点。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;85(10):2390-2398. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14058. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
Implementation of structured team-based review enhances knowledge consolidation and academic performance of undergraduate medical students studying neuroscience.实施基于结构化团队的评估有助于巩固本科医学生神经科学知识并提高其学业表现。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2020 Jun 1;44(2):232-238. doi: 10.1152/advan.00162.2019.
4
Piloting the United Kingdom 'Prescribing Safety Assessment' with pharmacist prescribers in Scotland.在苏格兰,与药剂师处方者一起试行英国“处方安全评估”。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Jan;14(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
5
A prescribing e-tutorial for medical students.面向医学生的处方电子教程。
Clin Teach. 2014 Feb;11(1):33-7. doi: 10.1111/tct.12100.
6
Prescribing Safety Assessment 2016: Delivery of a national prescribing assessment to 7343 UK final-year medical students.2016 年处方安全评估:向 7343 名英国医学应届毕业生提供全国性处方评估。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;83(10):2249-2258. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13319. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
7
Examining participant perceptions of an interprofessional simulation-based trauma team training for medical and nursing students.调查医学生和护理专业学生对基于模拟的跨专业创伤团队培训的参与者认知。
J Interprof Care. 2018 Jan;32(1):80-88. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1376625. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
8
UK medical students' perspectives on practical prescribing teaching and learning provisions: a cross-sectional survey.英国医学生对实用处方教学和学习规定的看法:一项横断面调查。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;75(10):1451-1458. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02718-w. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
9
Improving prescribing learning in problem-based learning.基于问题学习中处方学习的改进。
Clin Teach. 2024 Dec;21(6):e13827. doi: 10.1111/tct.13827. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
10
"Asking for help is a strength"-how to promote undergraduate medical students' teamwork through simulation training and interprofessional faculty.“寻求帮助是一种力量”——如何通过模拟训练和跨专业教师促进本科医学生的团队合作。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 28;14:1214091. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1214091. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Team-based learning (TBL) in clinical disciplines for undergraduate medical students-a scoping review.以团队为基础的学习(TBL)在临床医学本科生中的应用——范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04975-x.
2
Educational Interventions for Medical Students to Improve Pharmacological Knowledge and Prescribing Skills: A Scoping Review.医学专业学生的教育干预措施,以提高药理学知识和处方技能:范围综述。
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Aug 30;12(1):348-360. doi: 10.5334/pme.1006. eCollection 2023.
3
Teaching rational prescribing in undergraduate medical education: a systematic search and review.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the utility of the Prescribing Safety Assessment in pharmacy education in England: experiences of pre-registration trainees and undergraduate (MPharm) pharmacy students.探索英国药学教育中处方安全评估的效用:预注册实习生和本科(药学硕士)药学专业学生的经历。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2019 Apr;27(2):207-213. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12479. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
2
Very-short-answer questions: reliability, discrimination and acceptability.简答题:信度、区分度和可接受性。
Med Educ. 2018 Apr;52(4):447-455. doi: 10.1111/medu.13504. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
3
Do final-year medical students have sufficient prescribing competencies? A systematic literature review.
本科医学教育中的合理处方教学:系统检索与综述
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Mar;79(3):341-348. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03448-2. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
4
An Interprofessional Senior Medical Student Preparation Course: Improvement in Knowledge and Self-Confidence Before Entering Surgical Training.一门跨专业的高年级医学生预备课程:进入外科培训前知识与自信心的提升。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 May 7;12:441-451. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S287430. eCollection 2021.
5
How effective is team-based revision? An insight from medical students [Letter].基于团队的修订效果如何?来自医学生的见解[信件]
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Sep 12;10:815-816. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S226718. eCollection 2019.
应届医学专业毕业生是否具备足够的处方能力?一项系统文献回顾。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Apr;84(4):615-635. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13491. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
4
Prescribing Safety Assessment 2016: Delivery of a national prescribing assessment to 7343 UK final-year medical students.2016 年处方安全评估:向 7343 名英国医学应届毕业生提供全国性处方评估。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;83(10):2249-2258. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13319. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
5
The long-term impact of team-based learning on medical students' team performance scores and on their peer evaluation scores.基于团队的学习对医学生团队表现分数及其同伴评价分数的长期影响。
Med Teach. 2016 Oct;38(10):1017-1024. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1147537. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
6
Prescribing safety: ensuring that new graduates are prepared.处方安全:确保新毕业生做好准备。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):579-581. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62339-4.
7
The importance of free-text responses in team-based learning design.基于团队的学习设计中自由文本回复的重要性。
Acad Med. 2014 Dec;89(12):1578. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000512.
8
Introducing team based learning in undergraduate pharmacology.在本科药理学教学中引入基于团队的学习。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2013 Jan-Feb;45(1):102-3. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.106450.
9
Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65.团队学习:实用指南:AMEE 指南第 65 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(5):e275-87. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
10
Teaching clinical pharmacology using team-based learning: a comparison between third- and fourth-year medical students.采用团队学习法教授临床药理学:对 3 年级和 4 年级医学生的比较。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Dec;52(12):1806-14. doi: 10.1177/0091270011428986. Epub 2011 Dec 15.