• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新西兰的食品系统不可持续:对农业、环境和卫生部门专业人员对饮食指南的不同态度的调查。

New Zealand's Food System Is Unsustainable: A Survey of the Divergent Attitudes of Agriculture, Environment, and Health Sector Professionals Towards Eating Guidelines.

作者信息

Jones Rebekah, Wham Carol, Burlingame Barbara

机构信息

School of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.

School of Health Sciences, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2019 Jul 16;6:99. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00099. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fnut.2019.00099
PMID:31380383
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6648584/
Abstract

The Food and Agriculture Organisation has called for sustainable diets, which align with SDG 2, Zero Hunger, and SDG 12, Sustainable Consumption and Production. The inclusion of sustainability characteristics in New Zealand's (NZ) eating and activity guidelines (EAGs) may lead to achieving sustainable diets. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement among sectoral professionals of including sustainability characteristics within the guidelines. Agriculture, environment, and health sector professionals were invited to complete an online survey to establish agreement with sustainability characteristics and sustainability statements. Opinion and attitude questions were completed using a 5-item Likert scale. One-way ANOVA analyses were conducted to compare the level of agreement and differences in means of the sector levels of agreement whilst controlling for covariates. tests were used to determine sectoral differences. Overall, 298 (65% female) respondents completed the survey from the agriculture (37%), environment (22%), and health (41%) sectors. Two-thirds (66%) of respondents were over 35 years and 90% had a tertiary education. Two-thirds (63%) of respondents disagreed that NZ's current food system is sustainable; health (77%) and environment (78%) sector respondents had greater disagreement than those from agriculture (35%; = 0.00). Overall, 77% of respondents agreed that sustainability characteristics should be included in guidelines; health (90%) and environment (84%) sector respondents had greater agreement than from agriculture (58%; = 0.00). Five sustainability characteristics received high levels of agreement (>90%) for inclusion: dietary diversity, sustainable seafood, limit processed foods, reduced food waste, and sustainable lifestyle behaviours. Agreement for eight sustainability characteristics was highest among the health and environment sectors vs. the agricultural sector ( < 0.05). A relatively low level of agreement was received from all three sectors, particularly the environmental sector (68.7%), towards the characteristic "to consume recommended serves of dairy products." Only 38.5% of all respondents agreed with the inclusion of "organic food produce." Negative associations were observed between respondents' opinions regarding the sustainability of NZ's current food system and familiarity with the EAGs. Professionals from the agriculture, environment, and health sectors largely support the inclusion of sustainability characteristics in NZ's EAGs. A multi-sectoral approach will be required to address areas of divergence.

摘要

联合国粮食及农业组织呼吁采用与可持续发展目标2(零饥饿)和可持续发展目标12(可持续消费和生产)相一致的可持续饮食模式。在新西兰的饮食与活动指南(EAGs)中纳入可持续性特征可能有助于实现可持续饮食。本研究旨在评估各部门专业人员对于在指南中纳入可持续性特征的共识程度。邀请了农业、环境和卫生部门的专业人员完成一项在线调查,以确定他们对可持续性特征及可持续性声明的共识。意见和态度问题通过一个5级李克特量表来完成。进行单因素方差分析以比较共识水平以及在控制协变量的情况下各部门共识均值的差异。使用检验来确定部门间差异。总体而言,298名(65%为女性)受访者完成了该调查,他们分别来自农业(37%)、环境(22%)和卫生(41%)部门。三分之二(66%)的受访者年龄超过35岁,90%拥有高等教育学历。三分之二(63%)的受访者不同意新西兰当前的食物系统是可持续的;卫生部门(77%)和环境部门(78%)的受访者比农业部门(35%;P = 0.00)的受访者有更大的分歧。总体而言,77%的受访者同意应在指南中纳入可持续性特征;卫生部门(90%)和环境部门(84%)的受访者比农业部门(58%;P = 0.00)的受访者有更高的共识。有五项可持续性特征获得了较高的纳入共识(>90%):饮食多样性、可持续海产品、限制加工食品、减少食物浪费以及可持续生活方式行为。在八项可持续性特征方面,卫生和环境部门的共识高于农业部门(P < 0.05)。对于“食用推荐量的乳制品”这一特征,所有三个部门,尤其是环境部门(68.7%)的共识相对较低。所有受访者中只有38.5%同意纳入“有机食品生产”。在受访者对新西兰当前食物系统可持续性的看法与对饮食与活动指南的熟悉程度之间观察到了负相关关系。农业、环境和卫生部门的专业人员在很大程度上支持在新西兰的饮食与活动指南中纳入可持续性特征。需要采取多部门方法来解决存在分歧的领域。

相似文献

1
New Zealand's Food System Is Unsustainable: A Survey of the Divergent Attitudes of Agriculture, Environment, and Health Sector Professionals Towards Eating Guidelines.新西兰的食品系统不可持续:对农业、环境和卫生部门专业人员对饮食指南的不同态度的调查。
Front Nutr. 2019 Jul 16;6:99. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00099. eCollection 2019.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
A cross-sectional survey of the readiness of consumers to adopt an environmentally sustainable diet.消费者对采用环境可持续饮食的准备情况的横断面调查。
Nutr J. 2020 Dec 9;19(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00644-7.
4
Mitigating climate change and pandemic impacts on global food security: dual sustainable agriculture approach (2S approach).减轻气候变化和大流行病对全球粮食安全的影响:双重可持续农业方法(2S 方法)。
Planta. 2023 Oct 25;258(6):104. doi: 10.1007/s00425-023-04257-2.
5
6
Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability.红肉及加工肉类的消费、购买行为与态度:对人类健康、动物福利及环境可持续性的影响
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Sep;18(13):2446-56. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000567. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
7
Connecting the food and agriculture sector to nutrition interventions for improved health outcomes.将粮食和农业部门与营养干预措施相联系,以改善健康结果。
Food Secur. 2022;14(3):657-675. doi: 10.1007/s12571-022-01262-3. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
8
Community supported agriculture membership in Arizona. An exploratory study of food and sustainability behaviours.亚利桑那州社区支持农业会员制。对食品和可持续性行为的探索性研究。
Appetite. 2012 Oct;59(2):431-6. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
9
Perceptions and Attitudes of Argentine Zoomers towards Sustainable Food Production.阿根廷年轻一代对可持续粮食生产的认知与态度
Foods. 2023 Feb 27;12(5):1019. doi: 10.3390/foods12051019.
10
Food Sustainability Knowledge, Attitudes, and Dietary Habits among Students and Professionals of the Health Sciences.食品可持续性知识、健康科学专业学生和专业人士的态度和饮食行为。
Nutrients. 2023 Apr 25;15(9):2064. doi: 10.3390/nu15092064.

引用本文的文献

1
Feeding Indigenous Aotearoa better.让新西兰原住民吃得更好。
J R Soc N Z. 2024 Mar 20;55(6):2286-2304. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2024.2327420. eCollection 2025.
2
Gaps in environmental and social evidence base are holding back strategic action on our national food system.环境和社会证据基础方面的差距阻碍了我们在国家粮食系统上采取战略行动。
J R Soc N Z. 2025 Jul 3;55(6):2270-2275. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2025.2526838. eCollection 2025.
3
Effects of Replacing Cow's Milk with Plant-Based Beverages on Potential Nutrient Intake in Sustainable Healthy Dietary Patterns: A Case Study.用植物基饮料替代牛奶对可持续健康饮食模式中潜在营养素摄入的影响:案例研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 13;16(18):3083. doi: 10.3390/nu16183083.
4
A Rapid Review of the Environmental Impacts Associated with Food Consumption in Australia and New Zealand.对澳大利亚和新西兰与食物消费相关的环境影响的快速回顾。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2021 Dec;10(4):334-351. doi: 10.1007/s13668-021-00374-0. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
5
Cost and greenhouse gas emissions of current, healthy, flexitarian and vegan diets in Aotearoa (New Zealand).新西兰当前、健康、弹性素食和纯素饮食的成本及温室气体排放
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2021 Jun 9;4(1):275-284. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000262. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.人类世的食物:EAT-柳叶刀可持续食物系统健康饮食委员会
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
2
No need to change dairy food dietary guidelines yet.
Lancet. 2018 Nov 24;392(10161):2242-2244. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31945-7. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
3
Perspective: Food-Based Dietary Guidelines in Europe-Scientific Concepts, Current Status, and Perspectives.观点:欧洲的基于食物的膳食指南——科学概念、现状和展望。
Adv Nutr. 2018 Sep 1;9(5):544-560. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy033.
4
Retraction and Republication: Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1279-90.撤稿与重新发表:地中海饮食对心血管疾病的一级预防。《新英格兰医学杂志》2013年;368卷:1279 - 1290页。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 21;378(25):2441-2442. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1806491. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
5
Evaluating the environmental impacts of dietary recommendations.评估饮食建议的环境影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 19;114(51):13412-13417. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711889114. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
6
The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing.联合国营养十年、新食品分类法和超加工食品的问题。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jan;21(1):5-17. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000234. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
7
Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets.美国营养与饮食学会立场声明:素食饮食。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Dec;116(12):1970-1980. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.09.025.
8
Shrinking the food-print: A qualitative study into consumer perceptions, experiences and attitudes towards healthy and environmentally friendly food behaviours.缩小食物足迹:一项关于消费者对健康和环保食品行为的认知、体验及态度的定性研究。
Appetite. 2017 Jan 1;108:117-131. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.030. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
9
A Consensus Proposal for Nutritional Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of a Healthy Diet: The Mediterranean Diet as a Case Study.用于评估健康饮食可持续性的营养指标共识提案:以地中海饮食为例。
Front Nutr. 2016 Aug 29;3:37. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2016.00037. eCollection 2016.
10
Potential health hazards of eating red meat.食用红肉的潜在健康危害。
J Intern Med. 2017 Feb;281(2):106-122. doi: 10.1111/joim.12543. Epub 2016 Sep 6.