• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大儿童过敏行动计划:制定与验证。

The Canadian anaphylaxis action plan for kids: development and validation.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jan;103(1):227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2019.07.028
PMID:31383563
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We designed a written Canadian Anaphylaxis Action Plan for Kids (Kids' CAP) which incorporates validated pictograms with written instructions. Using a patient-centered approach, we aimed to validate the Kids' CAP and assess its impact on anaphylaxis recognition and treatment, and to determine its' perceived usefulness.

PATIENT INVOLVEMENT

Children and their parents were involved in appraising the design and written contents of the Kids' CAP.

METHODS

The design process consisted of a development phase and clinical validation phase. First, we assessed the readability and understandability of the Kids' CAP using validated instruments. Then, patients (12-17 years of age) and parents of patients (<12 years of age) were given the Kids' CAP during the first consultation with allergy specialists or an Emergency Department visit for anaphylaxis. Subsequently, we conducted a phone interview 2-3 weeks later to assess their comprehension of anaphylaxis management. We also used the Consumer Information Rating Form to measure the participants' perception of the design quality and usefulness of the Kids' CAP.

RESULTS

Of the 230 participants enrolled, 205 (89%) completed the follow-up interview. The written contents of the Kid's CAP were modified to match grade 7 readability level. The total mean score of the Consumer Information Rating Form for comprehensibility was 23.1 (SD 2.4), and 25.1 (SD 2.3) for design quality. The mean comprehension score was 11.3 (SD 1.8) (reference range 0-12), with no significant difference between participants with and without previous experience with anaphylaxis, or high vs. low literacy level.

CONCLUSION

Engaging children and parents in the design and contents of written anaphylaxis action plan is an innovative approach to produce a useful document for the end-users.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The Kids' CAP is a valid tool that can be used in emergency departments and allergy clinics to improve patient's comprehension of anaphylaxis manifestations and treatment.

摘要

目的

我们设计了一份书面的加拿大儿童过敏行动计划(Kids' CAP),其中包含经过验证的象形图和书面说明。我们采用以患者为中心的方法,旨在验证 Kids' CAP,并评估其对过敏反应识别和治疗的影响,并确定其被认为的有用性。

患者参与

儿童及其父母参与了评估 Kids' CAP 的设计和书面内容。

方法

设计过程包括开发阶段和临床验证阶段。首先,我们使用经过验证的工具评估了 Kids' CAP 的可读性和可理解性。然后,在过敏专科医生的首次就诊或因过敏反应就诊的急诊室,将 Kids' CAP 分发给 12-17 岁的患者和 <12 岁的患者的父母。随后,我们在 2-3 周后进行电话访谈,以评估他们对过敏反应管理的理解。我们还使用消费者信息评分表来衡量参与者对 Kids' CAP 的设计质量和有用性的看法。

结果

在纳入的 230 名参与者中,有 205 名(89%)完成了随访访谈。Kids' CAP 的书面内容已修改为符合 7 年级阅读水平。消费者信息评分表的总体理解评分平均值为 23.1(SD 2.4),设计质量评分为 25.1(SD 2.3)。平均理解得分为 11.3(SD 1.8)(参考范围为 0-12),有过敏反应既往史和无过敏反应既往史的参与者之间,以及高或低文化程度的参与者之间,理解评分无显著差异。

结论

让儿童和父母参与书面过敏反应行动计划的设计和内容是一种创新方法,可以为最终用户生成有用的文档。

实践意义

Kids' CAP 是一种有效的工具,可在急诊室和过敏诊所中使用,以提高患者对过敏反应表现和治疗的理解。

相似文献

1
The Canadian anaphylaxis action plan for kids: development and validation.加拿大儿童过敏行动计划:制定与验证。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jan;103(1):227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
2
Design and validation of pictograms in a pediatric anaphylaxis action plan.儿童过敏反应行动计划中象形图的设计与验证
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2015 May;26(3):223-233. doi: 10.1111/pai.12349.
3
Development and Assessment of a Pictographic Pediatric Constipation Action Plan.开发和评估一种图像版小儿便秘行动计划。
J Pediatr. 2021 Feb;229:118-126.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
4
Development and assessment of a low literacy, pictographic asthma action plan with clinical automation to enhance guideline-concordant care for children with asthma.开发并评估一种低识字率、象形图式的哮喘行动计划,并实现临床自动化,以加强符合指南的儿童哮喘护理。
J Asthma. 2023 Apr;60(4):655-672. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2087188. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
5
Emergency Management of Anaphylaxis Due to an Unknown Trigger: An 8-Year Follow-Up Study in Canada.由于未知触发因素导致的过敏反应的紧急管理:加拿大的一项为期 8 年的随访研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Apr;7(4):1166-1173.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.11.015. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
6
Relative validity of the Iowa Fluoride Study targeted nutrient semi-quantitative questionnaire and the block kids' food questionnaire for estimating beverage, calcium, and vitamin D intakes by children.爱荷华氟化物研究目标营养素半定量问卷与儿童综合食物问卷在评估儿童饮料、钙和维生素D摄入量方面的相对有效性。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Mar;108(3):465-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.12.002.
7
Innovative methods for parents and clinics to create tools for kids' care (IMPACCT Kids' Care) study protocol.家长与诊所为儿童护理创建工具的创新方法(IMPACCT儿童护理)研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Sep;44:159-163. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
8
Assessment of readability, understandability, and completeness of pediatric hospital medicine discharge instructions.评估儿科医院出院指导的可读性、易懂性和完整性。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Feb;12(2):98-101. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2688.
9
Factors that determine parents' perception of their child's risk of life-threatening food-induced anaphylaxis.决定父母对其孩子发生危及生命的食物诱导性过敏反应风险认知的因素。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2017 Jan 1;38(1):44-53. doi: 10.2500/aap.2017.38.4002.
10
Estimating the impact of various menu labeling formats on parents' demand for fast-food kids' meals for their children: An experimental auction.估计各种菜单标签格式对父母为孩子购买快餐儿童餐需求的影响:一项实验性拍卖。
Appetite. 2016 Oct 1;105:582-90. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces.2023 年国际心肺复苏和紧急心血管护理科学共识及治疗推荐:基础生命支持、高级生命支持、儿科生命支持、新生儿生命支持、教育、实施和团队以及急救任务组的总结。
Circulation. 2023 Dec 12;148(24):e187-e280. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001179. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
2
The Ability of First Aid Providers to Recognize Anaphylaxis: A Scoping Review.急救人员识别过敏反应的能力:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2023 Jul 8;15(7):e41547. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41547. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Development of an action plan for acute food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome in Japan.日本急性食物蛋白诱导的小肠结肠炎综合征行动计划的制定。
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 May 9;16(5):100772. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100772. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Children at risk of anaphylaxis: A mixed-studies systematic review of parents' experiences and information needs.有过敏反应风险的儿童:关于父母经历和信息需求的混合研究系统评价
PEC Innov. 2022 Jan 21;1:100018. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100018. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Development and psychometric validation for evaluating written medicine information in Thailand: The Consumer Information Rating Form.用于评估泰国医学信息书面材料的发展和心理测量学验证:消费者信息评分表。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 1;11(10):e053740. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053740.
6
Development and Assessment of a Pictographic Pediatric Constipation Action Plan.开发和评估一种图像版小儿便秘行动计划。
J Pediatr. 2021 Feb;229:118-126.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
What is new in anaphylaxis?过敏反应有哪些新进展?
Acta Biomed. 2020 Sep 15;91(11-S):e2020005. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i11-S.10308.