Ahuja Ankur, Tyagi Seema, Pati Hara Prasad, Saxena Renu, Somasundaram Venkatesan, Manivannan Prabhu, Tripathi Preeti, Chandra Dinesh
1Department of Lab Sciences and Molecular Medicine, Army Hospital (Research and Referral), New Delhi, India.
2Department of Haematology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110010 India.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2019 Jul;35(3):478-484. doi: 10.1007/s12288-018-01072-8. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
Routine investigation for recurrent pregnancy loss includes measurement of antiphospholipid antibodies. The lupus anticoagulant has long been associated with increased risks for thrombosis and adverse obstetric outcomes. But there are some disadvantages with lupus anticoagulant (LAC) tests which includes varied sensitivity of different clot based assays. ISTH recommends only 2 assays (preferably DRVVT and APTT-LA) for the identification of lupus anticoagulant but there are some studies which don't support this contention. Our study analyzed 526 samples from high risk pregnancy cases for APLA by all four LAC tests from tertiary centre of northern India. Among all the cases studies 65 cases were positive for lupus anticoagulant 25 of this became negative after 12 weeks. Among the 40 repeated positive assays, dRVVT could able to diagnose 36 cases followed by APTT-LA which could able to diagnose 28 cases, while KCT could able to diagnose 23 cases and dPT could able to diagnose only 14 cases. There were 12 cases in whom all lupus assays were positive. Our study thus concluded that DRVVT was the most sensitive followed by APPT-LA, KCT, dPT. The combination of dRVVT with APTT-LA or KCT appeared to be superior to other combinations. No individual test per se is 100% sensitive for the diagnosis of APLA in high risk pregnancy cases. Further results confirmed that repeated LAC result is required even in a high-risk setting. Positive LAC assay in majority were not associated with exclusively recurrent pregnancy loss but were associated with sporadic stillbirth and thrombosis.
复发性流产的常规检查包括抗磷脂抗体检测。狼疮抗凝物长期以来一直与血栓形成风险增加和不良产科结局相关。但狼疮抗凝物(LAC)检测存在一些缺点,包括不同基于凝血的检测方法灵敏度不同。国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)仅推荐2种检测方法(最好是稀释蝰蛇毒时间试验和活化部分凝血活酶时间狼疮抗凝物试验)用于狼疮抗凝物的鉴定,但有一些研究不支持这一观点。我们的研究对来自印度北部三级中心的526例高危妊娠病例的样本进行了所有4种LAC检测以分析抗磷脂抗体。在所有病例研究中,65例狼疮抗凝物检测呈阳性,其中25例在12周后转为阴性。在40例重复阳性检测中,稀释蝰蛇毒时间试验能够诊断36例,其次是活化部分凝血活酶时间狼疮抗凝物试验能够诊断28例,而白陶土凝血时间能够诊断23例,稀释凝血酶原时间仅能诊断14例。有12例所有狼疮检测均为阳性。我们的研究因此得出结论,稀释蝰蛇毒时间试验最敏感,其次是活化部分凝血活酶时间狼疮抗凝物试验、白陶土凝血时间、稀释凝血酶原时间。稀释蝰蛇毒时间试验与活化部分凝血活酶时间狼疮抗凝物试验或白陶土凝血时间的联合似乎优于其他组合。在高危妊娠病例中,没有任何一种单独检测本身对诊断抗磷脂抗体是100%敏感的。进一步结果证实,即使在高危情况下也需要重复进行LAC检测。大多数狼疮抗凝物检测阳性并非仅与复发性流产相关,而是与散发性死产和血栓形成相关。