Florida International University, Miami, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Hospital, 2001 8th Ave., Suite 400, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;29(4):537-548. doi: 10.1007/s00787-019-01382-w. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
The objective of this study is to evaluate support for three hypotheses about the etiology of adolescent-onset ADHD symptoms: (1) a "cool" cognitive load hypothesis, (2) a "hot" rewards processing hypothesis, and (3) a trauma exposure hypothesis. Participants (N = 50) were drawn from two public high schools in a culturally diverse metropolitan area. A detailed procedure for identifying and confirming late-onset ADHD cases is described. Adolescents with late-onset ADHD (n = 15) were identified and compared to childhood-onset (n = 17) and non-ADHD classmates (n = 18). Adolescents and parents completed measures of neurocognition, rewards' processing, clinical profile, and environmental demands. Late-onset cases were clinically and neurocognitively indistinguishable from childhood-onset cases; however, they experienced higher demands from parents (d = 1.09). Compared to the non-ADHD group, late-onset cases showed significant deficits in metacognition (d = 1.25) and academic motivation (d = 0.80), as well as a pronounced history of multiple trauma exposure (OR 11.82). At 1-year follow-up, ADHD persisted in 67.7% of late-onset cases. Late-onset cases (26.7%) were more likely than childhood-onset cases (0.0%) to transfer to alternative schools by 1-year follow-up. Multiple factors may contribute to adolescent-onset ADHD. Adolescents with metacognition and motivation deficits may be at greatest risk for the late-onset ADHD phenotype, particularly in highly demanding environments. Exposure to traumatic stress may play a key role in the exacerbation of existing deficits or onset of new symptoms. Late-onset ADHD was persistent in most cases and associated with higher risk for school disengagement than childhood-onset ADHD. Further work is needed to better understand the etiologies of late-onset ADHD symptoms.
本研究旨在评估三种关于青少年期 ADHD 症状病因的假设:(1)“冷静”认知负荷假设,(2)“热情”奖励处理假设,以及(3)创伤暴露假设。参与者(N=50)来自一个文化多元的大都市区的两所公立高中。描述了一种用于识别和确认迟发性 ADHD 病例的详细程序。确定了迟发性 ADHD 青少年(n=15),并与儿童期起病(n=17)和非 ADHD 同学(n=18)进行了比较。青少年和家长完成了神经认知、奖励处理、临床特征和环境需求的测量。迟发性病例在临床和神经认知上与儿童期起病病例无法区分;然而,他们面临来自父母的更高需求(d=1.09)。与非 ADHD 组相比,迟发性病例在元认知(d=1.25)和学业动机(d=0.80)方面存在显著缺陷,以及明显的多次创伤暴露史(OR 11.82)。在 1 年随访时,67.7%的迟发性病例仍存在 ADHD。迟发性病例(26.7%)比儿童期起病病例(0.0%)在 1 年随访时更有可能转入替代学校。多种因素可能导致青少年期起病的 ADHD。元认知和动机缺陷的青少年可能处于迟发性 ADHD 表型的最大风险中,特别是在要求极高的环境中。创伤性应激的暴露可能在加剧现有缺陷或新症状的出现方面发挥关键作用。大多数迟发性 ADHD 病例持续存在,且与儿童期起病 ADHD 相比,与更高的学校脱离风险相关。需要进一步的工作来更好地理解迟发性 ADHD 症状的病因。