Boerma G J, Gelderland J, van Gorp I, Leijnse B
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Academic Hospital Rotterdam-Dijkzigt, The Netherlands.
Clin Chem. 1988 Oct;34(10):2117-9.
Since its recalibration in 1987, the Reflotron "dry-chemistry" cholesterol method can produce accurate results. Here we report how cholesterol concentrations in venous blood, plasma, and serum determined with Reflotron compare with values determined for fingerstick samples. When no EDTA is used in the latter, accurate results may meet the WHO/CDC criterion of a maximum bias less than or equal to 5%. Reflotron users should avoid use of EDTA. Lot-to-lot variation among the solid-phase reagent carriers was evaluated in four lots of these strips. The largest difference, 0.4 mmol/L, was seen in a commercial quality-control serum with a cholesterol concentration of approximately 7 mmol/L. The maximum differences in results for several serum pools were not always found between the same reagent lots, although the highest results in five of six materials occurred with a single lot of strips. As in all clinical chemical testing, regular quality control is necessary.
自1987年重新校准以来,Reflotron“干化学”胆固醇检测方法能够得出准确结果。在此我们报告用Reflotron测定的静脉血、血浆和血清中的胆固醇浓度与用指尖血样本测定的值相比情况如何。当后者不使用乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)时,准确结果可能符合世界卫生组织/美国疾病控制与预防中心(WHO/CDC)最大偏差小于或等于5%的标准。Reflotron的使用者应避免使用EDTA。在四批此类试纸条中评估了固相试剂载体之间的批次间差异。在胆固醇浓度约为7 mmol/L的市售质量控制血清中观察到最大差异为0.4 mmol/L。几个血清样本池结果的最大差异并不总是出现在相同的试剂批次之间,尽管六种材料中有五种的最高结果出现在同一批试纸条上。与所有临床化学检测一样,定期进行质量控制是必要的。