Suppr超能文献

电子烟液丙二醇和蔬菜甘油比例对主观效应、强化价值评分以及当前吸烟者使用情况的影响。

The Impact of E-liquid Propylene Glycol and Vegetable Glycerin Ratio on Ratings of Subjective Effects, Reinforcement Value, and Use in Current Smokers.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Cancer Control and Prevention, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(5):791-797. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz130.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) vary on a wide range of characteristics that may affect reinforcement value and use. One characteristic is the ratio of two solvents commonly used in most e-liquids: propylene glycol (PG) and vegetable glycerin (VG). The goal of this study was to understand how PG/VG ratio affects subjective effects, reinforcement value, and tobacco use patterns among current smokers who try using ENDS.

AIMS AND METHODS

Current smokers with minimal ENDS use history (n = 30) sampled, in a double-blind fashion, three different e-liquids that varied in PG/VG ratio (70/30, 50/50, 0/100) while holding constant other aspects of the e-liquid and ENDS. Participants tried each e-liquid before rating the subjective effects on a modified version of the Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire. Reinforcement value was assessed using a preference task where participants chose between the three e-liquids. The impact of each e-liquid on cigarette reinforcement was assessed using a modified version of the Cigarette Purchase Task. Participants were randomly assigned to receive one e-liquid to take home for 1 week.

RESULTS

PG/VG ratio had minimal impact on most of the tested outcomes. Participants rated the highest PG concentration as having a stronger "throat hit" than the other two. There was no significant difference between the number of participants who preferred each of the PG/VG ratios in the preference assessment. PG/VG ratio did not affect cigarette or ENDS use during the sampling week.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that PG/VG ratio has minimal impact on subjective effects and reinforcement value in ENDS naive current smokers.

IMPLICATIONS

These data suggest that PG/VG ratio, within the range that is commonly used, has minimal impact on subjective effects, reinforcement value, or uptake in current smokers with minimal ENDS experience.

摘要

简介

电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)在许多特性上存在差异,这些特性可能会影响强化价值和使用。一个特点是两种溶剂的比例,这两种溶剂通常在大多数电子烟液中使用:丙二醇(PG)和蔬菜甘油(VG)。本研究的目的是了解 PG/VG 比例如何影响尝试使用 ENDS 的当前吸烟者的主观效果、强化价值和吸烟模式。

目的和方法

目前吸烟史最少的吸烟者(n = 30)以双盲方式吸食三种不同的电子烟液,这些电子烟液的 PG/VG 比例不同(70/30、50/50、0/100),同时保持电子烟液和 ENDS 的其他方面不变。参与者在每个电子烟液前试用,并在修改后的香烟评价问卷上对主观效果进行评分。使用偏好任务评估强化价值,参与者在三种电子烟液之间进行选择。使用修改后的香烟购买任务评估每种电子烟液对香烟强化的影响。参与者被随机分配到其中一种电子烟液带回家使用一周。

结果

PG/VG 比例对大多数测试结果的影响很小。参与者认为 PG 浓度最高的电子烟液的“喉咙刺激感”比其他两种更强。在偏好评估中,没有显著差异表明参与者更喜欢哪种 PG/VG 比例。在采样周内,PG/VG 比例并未影响香烟或电子烟的使用。

结论

这些数据表明,在 ENDS 新手当前吸烟者中,PG/VG 比例对主观效果和强化价值的影响很小。

意义

这些数据表明,在当前吸烟者中,在常见范围内的 PG/VG 比例对主观效果、强化价值或使用率的影响很小,这些吸烟者的 ENDS 经验很少。

相似文献

3
Stimulus effects of propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin in electronic cigarette liquids.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jan 1;194:326-329. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.08.039. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
6
Acute exposure to electronic cigarette components alters mRNA expression of pre-osteoblasts.
FASEB J. 2024 Sep 15;38(17):e70017. doi: 10.1096/fj.202302014RRR.
7
E-cigarette constituents propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin decrease glucose uptake and its metabolism in airway epithelial cells in vitro.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2020 Dec 1;319(6):L957-L967. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00123.2020. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
9
The role of E-liquid vegetable glycerin and exhaled aerosol on cue reactivity to tank-based electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS).
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Jul;236(7):2083-2092. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05202-6. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
10
Analysis of symptoms and their potential associations with e-liquids' components: a social media study.
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 30;16:674. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3326-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.
2
The Impact of E-Cigarettes on Oral Health-A Narrative Review.
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Dec 10;12(12):404. doi: 10.3390/dj12120404.
4
A multi-year characterization of confiscated vaping products from Virginia school youth.
J Anal Toxicol. 2024 Oct 28;48(8):606-615. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkae060.
5
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub8.
6
Electronic cigarette exposure disrupts airway epithelial barrier function and exacerbates viral infection.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2023 Nov 1;325(5):L580-L593. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00135.2023. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
8
Impact of e-cigarette vaping aerosol exposure in pregnancy on mTOR signaling in rat fetal hippocampus.
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jun 28;17:1217127. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1217127. eCollection 2023.
9
10
Measuring vaping-related expectancies in young adults: Psychometric evaluation of the Electronic Nicotine Vaping Outcomes (ENVO) scale.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 May 1;246:109861. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109861. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Electronic Cigarette Liquid Flavors and Modified Risk Messages on Perceptions and Subjective Effects of E-Cigarettes.
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Apr;46(2):197-203. doi: 10.1177/1090198118806965. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
5
E-cigarettes: Impact of E-Liquid Components and Device Characteristics on Nicotine Exposure.
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2018;16(4):438-459. doi: 10.2174/1570159X15666171016164430.
8
E-cigarette use in adults: a qualitative study of users' perceptions and future use intentions.
Addict Res Theory. 2016;24(4):313-321. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2016.1139700. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
9
Tobacco Product Use Among Adults - United States, 2013-2014.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Jul 15;65(27):685-91. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6527a1.
10
Concentration of Nicotine and Glycols in 27 Electronic Cigarette Formulations.
J Anal Toxicol. 2016 Jul;40(6):403-7. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkw037. Epub 2016 May 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验