• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价新型种植钻孔技术——骨强化(Osseodensification)在低骨密度条件下种植体的初期稳定性:一项体外研究。

Evaluation of the primary stability in dental implants placed in low density bone with a new drilling technique, Osseodensification: an in vitro study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Oral Implantology Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Catholic University of Valencia Calle Quevedo nº2, 46001, Valencia, Spain

出版信息

Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 May 1;26(3):e361-e367. doi: 10.4317/medoral.24231.

DOI:10.4317/medoral.24231
PMID:33037795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8141313/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary stability is an important key determinant of implant osseointegration. We investigated approaches to improve primary implant stability using a new drilling technique termed osseodensification (OD), which was compared with the conventional under-drilling (UD) method utilized for low-density bones.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We placed 55 conical internal connection implants in each group, in 30 low-density sections of pig tibia. The implants were placed using twist drill bits in both groups; groups Under Drilling (UD) and Osseodensification (OD) included bone sections subjected to conventional UD and OD drilling, respectively. Before placing the implants, we randomized the bone sections that were to receive these implants to avoid sample bias. We evaluated various primary stability parameters, such as implant insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements.

RESULTS

The results showed that compared with implants placed using the UD technique, those placed using the OD technique were associated with significantly higher primary stability. The mean insertion torque of the implants was 8.87±6.17 Ncm in group 1 (UD) and 21.72±17.14 Ncm in group 2 (OD). The mean RFA was 65.16±7.45 ISQ in group 1 (UD) and 69.75±6.79 ISQ in group 2 (OD).

CONCLUSIONS

The implant insertion torque and RFA values were significantly higher in OD group than in UD. Therefore, compared with UD, OD improves primary stability in low-density bones (based on torque and RFA measurements).

摘要

背景

初始稳定性是决定种植体骨整合的重要关键因素。我们研究了一种新的钻孔技术——骨强化(OD),以提高初始种植体稳定性的方法,该技术与用于低密度骨的传统浅钻(UD)方法进行了比较。

材料和方法

我们在 30 个猪胫骨低密度节段的每组中放置了 55 个锥形内部连接种植体。两组均使用扭转钻头放置种植体; 下钻组(UD)和骨强化组(OD)分别包括接受常规 UD 和 OD 钻孔的骨节段。在放置种植体之前,我们随机化了接受这些种植体的骨节段,以避免样本偏差。我们评估了各种初始稳定性参数,例如种植体插入扭矩和共振频率分析(RFA)测量。

结果

结果表明,与使用 UD 技术放置的种植体相比,使用 OD 技术放置的种植体具有更高的初始稳定性。组 1(UD)中的种植体插入扭矩平均值为 8.87±6.17 Ncm,组 2(OD)中的种植体插入扭矩平均值为 21.72±17.14 Ncm。组 1(UD)中的平均 RFA 为 65.16±7.45 ISQ,组 2(OD)中的平均 RFA 为 69.75±6.79 ISQ。

结论

OD 组的种植体插入扭矩和 RFA 值明显高于 UD 组。因此,与 UD 相比,OD 可提高低密度骨的初始稳定性(基于扭矩和 RFA 测量)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a5/8141313/3fcc17dfd7a5/medoral-26-e361-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a5/8141313/9539597a719e/medoral-26-e361-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a5/8141313/2f560a4abe8c/medoral-26-e361-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a5/8141313/9f14d800a270/medoral-26-e361-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a5/8141313/3fcc17dfd7a5/medoral-26-e361-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a5/8141313/9539597a719e/medoral-26-e361-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a5/8141313/2f560a4abe8c/medoral-26-e361-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a5/8141313/9f14d800a270/medoral-26-e361-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a5/8141313/3fcc17dfd7a5/medoral-26-e361-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the primary stability in dental implants placed in low density bone with a new drilling technique, Osseodensification: an in vitro study.评价新型种植钻孔技术——骨强化(Osseodensification)在低骨密度条件下种植体的初期稳定性:一项体外研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 May 1;26(3):e361-e367. doi: 10.4317/medoral.24231.
2
Osseodensification effect on implants primary and secondary stability: Multicenter controlled clinical trial.骨密度对种植体初期和次级稳定性的影响:多中心对照临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Jun;23(3):317-328. doi: 10.1111/cid.13007. Epub 2021 May 27.
3
Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and insertional torque (IT) stability comparisons of implants placed using osteotomes versus drilling techniques: A preliminary case study.使用骨凿与钻孔技术植入种植体的共振频率分析(RFA)和植入扭矩(IT)稳定性比较:一项初步病例研究。
Quintessence Int. 2015 Oct;46(9):789-98. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a34453.
4
Influence of Bone Quality, Drilling Protocol, Implant Diameter/Length on Primary Stability: An In Vitro Comparative Study on Insertion Torque and Resonance Frequency Analysis.骨质量、钻孔方案、种植体直径/长度对初期稳定性的影响:一项关于植入扭矩和共振频率分析的体外对比研究
J Oral Implantol. 2020 Jun 1;46(3):182-189. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00145.
5
Effects of Drilling Protocol and Bone Density on the Stability of Implants According to Different Macrogeometries of the Implant Used: Results of an In Vitro Study.不同种植体宏观形态下基于钻取方案和骨质密度对种植体稳定性的影响:一项体外研究结果。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Sep/Oct;35(5):955-964. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8176.
6
Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low density bone. An experimental study in sheep.用于低密度骨中骨内种植体植入的骨致密化钻孔的生物力学和组织学基础。一项在绵羊身上的实验研究。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Oct;63:56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
7
Assessing peri-implant bone microarchitecture: conventional vs. osseodensification drilling - ex vivo analysis.评估种植体周围骨微观结构:传统与骨密实化钻孔-体外分析。
Braz Dent J. 2024 Mar 22;35:e245599. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202405599. eCollection 2024.
8
Evaluation of the Osseodensification Technique in Implant Primary Stability: Study on Cadavers.评价种植体初期稳定性的骨整合技术:尸体研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 May-Jun;37(3):593-600. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9144.
9
Biomechanical and histomorphometric analysis of endosteal implants placed by using the osseodensification technique in animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.骨密度增高技术在动物模型中植入内骨种植体的生物力学和组织形态计量学分析:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
10
Under-Drilling versus Hybrid Osseodensification Technique: Differences in Implant Primary Stability and Bone Density of the Implant Bed Walls.欠钻与混合骨致密化技术:种植体初期稳定性及种植床壁骨密度的差异
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 15;13(2):390. doi: 10.3390/ma13020390.

引用本文的文献

1
Osseodensification versus piezoelectric internal sinus elevation (PISE) technique in delayed implant placement (a randomized controlled clinical trial).骨密度增强与压电内窦提升(PISE)技术在延迟种植体植入中的应用(一项随机对照临床试验)。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):1306. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04964-6.
2
Radiographic Study of Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation Using Osseodensification Technique with Graft Material: A Pilot Study.使用植骨材料的骨致密化技术进行经牙槽嵴上颌窦底提升的影像学研究:一项初步研究。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 May 4;9(5):276. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9050276.
3
New strategy for osseodensification during osteotomy in low-density bone: an in vitro experimental study.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of cortical bone and implant design in the primary stability of dental implants measured by two different devices of resonance frequency analysis: An study.通过两种不同的共振频率分析装置测量皮质骨和种植体设计对牙种植体初期稳定性的影响:一项研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Mar 1;12(3):e242-e248. doi: 10.4317/jced.56014. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Influence of time on primary stability of dental implants placed with osteotomes due to the elastic properties of peri-implant bone.由于种植体周围骨的弹性特性,时间对使用骨凿植入的牙种植体初期稳定性的影响。
J Dent Sci. 2019 Dec;14(4):358-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 May 21.
3
在低骨密度骨切开术中增强骨密度的新策略:一项体外实验研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 24;13(1):11924. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39144-z.
4
Analysis of Bone Density and Bone Morphometry by Periapical Radiographs in Dental Implant Osseointegration Process.根尖片分析牙种植体骨结合过程中的骨密度和骨形态计量学
Int J Dent. 2023 Apr 3;2023:4763961. doi: 10.1155/2023/4763961. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Osseodensification Versus Conventional Osteotomy Technique on Dental Implant Primary Stability: An Ex Vivo Study.骨致密化与传统截骨术对牙种植体初期稳定性影响的比较评估:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2022 Oct 29;14(10):e30843. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30843. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Does the Modification of the Apical Geometry of a Dental Implant Affect Its Primary Stability? A Comparative Ex Vivo Study.牙种植体根尖几何形状的改变会影响其初期稳定性吗?一项体外对照研究。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;14(7):1728. doi: 10.3390/ma14071728.
7
Retrospective study of alveolar ridge preservation compared with no alveolar ridge preservation in periodontally compromised extraction sockets.牙周病损患者拔牙窝内牙槽嵴保存与不保存的回顾性研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Mar 26;7(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00305-2.
Osseodensification -- A systematic review and qualitative analysis of published literature.
骨致密化——已发表文献的系统评价与定性分析
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020 Jan-Mar;10(1):375-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
4
Repeatability of the resonance frequency analysis values in implants with a new technology.新型种植体的共振频率分析值具有可重复性。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Sep 1;24(5):e636-e642. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22761.
5
Correlation between Insertion Torque and Implant Stability Quotient in Tapered Implants with Knife-Edge Thread Design.刃状螺纹设计的锥形种植体的植入扭矩与种植体稳定性系数的相关性。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 15;2018:7201093. doi: 10.1155/2018/7201093. eCollection 2018.
6
Effect of bone quality, implant design, and surgical technique on primary implant stability.骨质量、种植体设计及手术技术对种植体初期稳定性的影响。
Quintessence Int. 2018 Jan 22:189-198. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a39745.
7
A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact.一种用于种植体截骨术准备的新型骨致密化方法,以提高生物力学初始稳定性、骨矿物质密度和骨与种植体的接触。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):27-36. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4817. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
8
Biomechanical evaluation of oversized drilling technique on primary implant stability measured by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis.通过植入扭矩和共振频率分析对超大钻孔技术对初次种植体稳定性的生物力学评估。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2016 Jul 1;8(3):e307-11. doi: 10.4317/jced.52873. eCollection 2016 Jul.
9
Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low density bone. An experimental study in sheep.用于低密度骨中骨内种植体植入的骨致密化钻孔的生物力学和组织学基础。一项在绵羊身上的实验研究。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Oct;63:56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
10
Comparison of Implant Stability Using Resonance Frequency Analysis: Osteotome Versus Conventional Drilling.使用共振频率分析比较种植体稳定性:骨凿法与传统钻孔法
J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Sep;12(9):647-54.