Sheng Yang, Li Taoran, Yoo Sua, Yin Fang-Fang, Blitzblau Rachel, Horton Janet K, Ge Yaorong, Wu Q Jackie
Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
Front Oncol. 2019 Aug 7;9:750. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00750. eCollection 2019.
To develop an automatic treatment planning system for whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) based on two intensity-modulated tangential fields, enabling near-real-time planning. A total of 40 WBRT plans from a single institution were included in this study under IRB approval. Twenty WBRT plans, 10 with single energy (SE, 6MV) and 10 with mixed energy (ME, 6/15MV), were randomly selected as training dataset to develop the methodology for automatic planning. The rest 10 SE cases and 10 ME cases served as validation. The auto-planning process consists of three steps. First, an energy prediction model was developed to automate energy selection. This model establishes an anatomy-energy relationship based on principle component analysis (PCA) of the gray level histograms from training cases' digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). Second, a random forest (RF) model generates an initial fluence map using the selected energies. Third, the balance of overall dose contribution throughout the breast tissue is realized by automatically selecting anchor points and applying centrality correction. The proposed method was tested on the validation dataset. Non-parametric equivalence test was performed for plan quality metrics using one-sided Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. For validation, the auto-planning system suggested same energy choices as clinical-plans in 19 out of 20 cases. The mean (standard deviation, SD) of percent target volume covered by 100% prescription dose was 82.5% (4.2%) for auto-plans, and 79.3% (4.8%) for clinical-plans ( > 0.999). Mean (SD) volume receiving 105% Rx were 95.2 cc (90.7 cc) for auto-plans and 83.9 cc (87.2 cc) for clinical-plans ( = 0.108). Optimization time for auto-plan was <20 s while clinical manual planning takes between 30 min and 4 h. We developed an automatic treatment planning system that generates WBRT plans with optimal energy selection, clinically comparable plan quality, and significant reduction in planning time, allowing for near-real-time planning.
开发一种基于两个调强切线野的全乳放疗(WBRT)自动治疗计划系统,以实现近实时规划。本研究在机构审查委员会(IRB)批准下纳入了来自单一机构的40个WBRT计划。随机选择20个WBRT计划,其中10个采用单能(SE,6MV),10个采用混合能(ME,6/15MV)作为训练数据集,以开发自动规划方法。其余10个SE病例和10个ME病例用作验证。自动规划过程包括三个步骤。首先,开发一个能量预测模型以实现能量选择自动化。该模型基于训练病例数字重建射线照片(DRR)灰度直方图的主成分分析(PCA)建立解剖结构 - 能量关系。其次,随机森林(RF)模型使用所选能量生成初始注量图。第三,通过自动选择锚点并应用中心性校正来实现整个乳腺组织中总剂量贡献的平衡。在验证数据集上对所提出的方法进行了测试。使用单侧Wilcoxon符号秩检验对计划质量指标进行非参数等效性检验。对于验证,自动规划系统在20个病例中的19个病例中建议的能量选择与临床计划相同。自动计划中100%处方剂量覆盖的靶体积百分比的平均值(标准差,SD)为82.5%(4.2%),临床计划为79.3%(4.8%)(>0.999)。自动计划中接受105%处方剂量的平均(SD)体积为95.2 cc(90.7 cc),临床计划为83.9 cc(87.2 cc)(P = 0.108)。自动计划的优化时间<20秒,而临床手动规划需要30分钟至4小时。我们开发了一种自动治疗计划系统,该系统能生成具有最佳能量选择、临床可比计划质量且规划时间显著缩短的WBRT计划,从而实现近实时规划。