Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo, School of Sport and Leisure, 4960-320 Melgaço, Portugal.
Instituto de Telecomunicações, Delegação da Covilhã, 6200-001 Covilhã, Portugal.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 23;16(17):3057. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173057.
The aim of this study was two-fold: (i) to describe the training/match ratios of different external load measures during a full professional soccer season while analyzing the variations between different types of weeks (three, four and five training sessions/week) and (ii) to investigate the relationship between weekly accumulated training loads and the match demands of the same week. Twenty-seven professional soccer players (24.9 ± 3.5 years old) were monitored daily using a 10-Hz global positioning system with a 100-Hz accelerometer. Total distance (TD), running distance (RD), high-speed running (HSR), sprinting distance (SD), player load (PL), number of high accelerations (ACC), and number of high decelerations (DEC) were recorded during training sessions and matches. An individual training/match ratio (TMr) was calculated for each external load measure. Weeks with five training sessions (5dW) presented meaningfully greater TMr than weeks with four (4dW) or three (3dW) training sessions. Additionally, TDratio (TDr) was significantly greater in 5dW than in 3dW (mean differences dif: 1.23 arbitray units A.U.) and 4dW (dif: 0.80 A.U.); HSRr was significantly greater in 5dW than in 3dW (dif: 0.90 A.U.) and 4dW (dif: 0.68 A.U.); and SDr was significantly greater in 5dW than in 3dW (dif: 0.77 A.U.) and 4dW (dif: 0.90 A.U.). Correlations between the weekly training loads and the match demands of the same week were small for PL (r = 0.250 [0.13;0.36]), ACC (r = 0.292 [0.17;0.40]) and DEC (r = 0.236 [0.11;0.35]). This study reveals that ratios of above 1 were observed for specific measures (e.g., HSR, SD). It was also observed that training sessions are not adjusted according to weekly variations in match demands.
(i)描述整个职业足球赛季不同外部负荷测量的训练/比赛比例,同时分析不同类型周(每周 3、4 和 5 次训练)之间的差异;(ii)研究每周累积训练负荷与同一周比赛需求之间的关系。27 名职业足球运动员(24.9 ± 3.5 岁)使用 10Hz 全球定位系统和 100Hz 加速度计进行日常监测。在训练和比赛中记录了总距离(TD)、跑动距离(RD)、高速跑动(HSR)、冲刺距离(SD)、球员负荷(PL)、高加速度次数(ACC)和高减速次数(DEC)。为每个外部负荷测量计算了个体训练/比赛比例(TMr)。每周进行 5 次训练(5dW)的 TMr 明显高于每周进行 4 次(4dW)或 3 次(3dW)训练的 TMr。此外,5dW 的 TDr 明显高于 3dW(均值差异 dif:1.23 个任意单位 A.U.)和 4dW(dif:0.80 A.U.);5dW 的 HSRr 明显高于 3dW(dif:0.90 A.U.)和 4dW(dif:0.68 A.U.);5dW 的 SDr 明显高于 3dW(dif:0.77 A.U.)和 4dW(dif:0.90 A.U.)。PL(r = 0.250 [0.13;0.36])、ACC(r = 0.292 [0.17;0.40])和 DEC(r = 0.236 [0.11;0.35])与同一周比赛需求之间的每周训练负荷相关性较小。本研究表明,对于特定测量值(例如 HSR、SD),观察到比值大于 1。还观察到,训练并未根据每周比赛需求的变化进行调整。