• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用基于地理信息系统的机器学习技术评估滑坡易发性模型中地形变量的尺度效应。

Evaluating scale effects of topographic variables in landslide susceptibility models using GIS-based machine learning techniques.

作者信息

Chang Kuan-Tsung, Merghadi Abdelaziz, Yunus Ali P, Pham Binh Thai, Dou Jie

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering and Environmental Informatics, Minghsin University of Science and Technology, Hsin-Chu, 304, Taiwan.

Research Laboratory of Sedimentary Environment, Mineral and Water resources of Eastern Algeria, Larbi Tebessi University, Tebessa, Algeria.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 23;9(1):12296. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48773-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-48773-2
PMID:31444375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6707277/
Abstract

The quality of digital elevation models (DEMs), as well as their spatial resolution, are important issues in geomorphic studies. However, their influence on landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) remains poorly constrained. This work determined the scale dependency of DEM-derived geomorphometric factors in LSM using a 5 m LiDAR DEM, LiDAR resampled 30 m DEM, and a 30 m ASTER DEM. To verify the validity of our approach, we first compiled an inventory map comprising of 267 landslides for Sihjhong watershed, Taiwan, from 2004 to 2014. Twelve landslide causative factors were then generated from the DEMs and ancillary data. Afterward, popular statistical and machine learning techniques, namely, logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) were implemented to produce the LSM. The accuracies of models were evaluated by overall accuracy, kappa index and the receiver operating characteristic curve indicators. The highest accuracy was attained from the resampled 30 m LiDAR DEM derivatives, indicating a fine-resolution topographic data does not necessarily achieve the best performance. Additionally, RF attained superior performance between the three presented models. Our findings could contribute to opt for an appropriate DEM resolution for mapping landslide hazard in vulnerable areas.

摘要

数字高程模型(DEM)的质量及其空间分辨率是地貌研究中的重要问题。然而,它们对滑坡易发性制图(LSM)的影响仍未得到充分限制。这项工作使用5米激光雷达DEM、重采样为30米的激光雷达DEM和30米的ASTER DEM,确定了LSM中DEM衍生的地形几何因子的尺度依赖性。为了验证我们方法的有效性,我们首先编制了一张2004年至2014年台湾四湖流域267处滑坡的清单图。然后从DEM和辅助数据中生成了12个滑坡成因因子。随后,采用流行的统计和机器学习技术,即逻辑回归(LR)、随机森林(RF)和支持向量机(SVM)来生成LSM。通过总体精度、kappa指数和接收器操作特征曲线指标对模型的准确性进行评估。重采样为30米的激光雷达DEM衍生数据获得了最高精度,这表明高分辨率地形数据不一定能取得最佳效果。此外,在提出的三个模型中,RF表现最佳。我们的研究结果有助于为在脆弱地区绘制滑坡灾害图选择合适的DEM分辨率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/5d48fd4b6085/41598_2019_48773_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/ea1739ec1833/41598_2019_48773_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/a20a6cb4ec45/41598_2019_48773_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/dc8263ad7b51/41598_2019_48773_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/2cfd76dfc4ae/41598_2019_48773_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/ac1c3ff27649/41598_2019_48773_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/150c5cb58d77/41598_2019_48773_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/3d6375ab35e8/41598_2019_48773_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/8163c4f0cb7f/41598_2019_48773_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/6346a29f0514/41598_2019_48773_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/9da67ce0defa/41598_2019_48773_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/8162ea29048a/41598_2019_48773_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/5d48fd4b6085/41598_2019_48773_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/ea1739ec1833/41598_2019_48773_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/a20a6cb4ec45/41598_2019_48773_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/dc8263ad7b51/41598_2019_48773_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/2cfd76dfc4ae/41598_2019_48773_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/ac1c3ff27649/41598_2019_48773_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/150c5cb58d77/41598_2019_48773_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/3d6375ab35e8/41598_2019_48773_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/8163c4f0cb7f/41598_2019_48773_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/6346a29f0514/41598_2019_48773_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/9da67ce0defa/41598_2019_48773_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/8162ea29048a/41598_2019_48773_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab6/6707277/5d48fd4b6085/41598_2019_48773_Fig12_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating scale effects of topographic variables in landslide susceptibility models using GIS-based machine learning techniques.利用基于地理信息系统的机器学习技术评估滑坡易发性模型中地形变量的尺度效应。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 23;9(1):12296. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48773-2.
2
Optimizing the Predictive Ability of Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using SMOTE for Lishui City in Zhejiang Province, China.利用 SMOTE 优化机器学习方法在浙江省丽水市滑坡易发性制图中的预测能力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 28;16(3):368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030368.
3
Modelling the dynamics of a large rock landslide in the Dolomites (eastern Italian Alps) using multi-temporal DEMs.利用多时相数字高程模型模拟多洛米蒂山脉(意大利东部阿尔卑斯山)大型岩石滑坡的动力学过程。
PeerJ. 2018 Nov 8;6:e5903. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5903. eCollection 2018.
4
GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping in the Longmen Mountain area (China) using three different machine learning algorithms and their comparison.基于 GIS 的龙门山地区(中国)滑坡敏感性制图研究,使用三种不同的机器学习算法及其比较。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(38):88612-88626. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28730-3. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
5
Comparison of Random Forest Model and Frequency Ratio Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing, China).随机森林模型与频率比模型在渝阳区(中国重庆)滑坡易发性制图(LSM)中的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;17(12):4206. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124206.
6
Selecting optimal conditioning parameters for landslide susceptibility: an experimental research on Aqabat Al-Sulbat, Saudi Arabia.选择最优的滑坡敏感性条件参数:沙特阿拉伯阿克拉巴尔特苏巴特的实验研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(3):3743-3762. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15886-z. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
7
Assessment of advanced random forest and decision tree algorithms for modeling rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan.评估先进的随机森林和决策树算法在日本伊豆大岛火山岛降雨诱发滑坡敏感性建模中的应用。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 20;662:332-346. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.221. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
8
Evaluation of Different Landslide Susceptibility Models for a Local Scale in the Chitral District, Northern Pakistan.评估巴基斯坦北部奇特拉尔地区局部尺度的不同滑坡敏感性模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 19;22(9):3107. doi: 10.3390/s22093107.
9
Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning Algorithm Validated by Persistent Scatterer In-SAR Technique.基于永久散射体干涉合成孔径雷达技术的机器学习算法的滑坡敏感性制图。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 19;22(9):3119. doi: 10.3390/s22093119.
10
Exploring machine learning and statistical approach techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping in Siwalik Himalayan Region using geospatial technology.利用地理空间技术探索机器学习和统计方法在喜马拉雅山西瓦利克地区进行滑坡敏感性制图。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):10443-10459. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31670-7. Epub 2024 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing ensemble learning for satellite-based multi-hazard monitoring and susceptibility assessment of landslides, land subsidence, floods, and wildfires.优化用于基于卫星的滑坡、地面沉降、洪水和野火多灾害监测及易发性评估的集成学习。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 22;15(1):30968. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15381-2.
2
Landslide data sample augmentation and landslide susceptibility analysis in Nyingchi City based on the MCMC model.基于马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)模型的林芝市滑坡数据样本增强及滑坡易发性分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 15;15(1):25624. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10651-5.
3
Landslide susceptibility mapping using an entropy index-based negative sample selection strategy: A case study of Luolong county.

本文引用的文献

1
Modelling the Hindered Settling Velocity of a Falling Particle in a Particle-Fluid Mixture by the Tsallis Entropy Theory.基于Tsallis熵理论对颗粒-流体混合物中下落颗粒的受阻沉降速度进行建模。
Entropy (Basel). 2019 Jan 11;21(1):55. doi: 10.3390/e21010055.
2
Improved Bathymetric Mapping of Coastal and Lake Environments Using Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Images.利用哨兵-2和陆地卫星-8影像改进沿海和湖泊环境的水深测绘
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jun 21;19(12):2788. doi: 10.3390/s19122788.
3
Assessment of advanced random forest and decision tree algorithms for modeling rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan.
基于熵指数的负样本选择策略的滑坡易发性制图:以洛龙县为例
PLoS One. 2025 May 9;20(5):e0322566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322566. eCollection 2025.
4
The dynamic threat from landslides following large continental earthquakes.大型陆地震后滑坡的动态威胁。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 21;19(8):e0308444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308444. eCollection 2024.
5
Landslide type inference based on statistical analysis of a high-resolution digital elevation model in Gorce National Park, Poland.基于波兰戈尔采国家公园高分辨率数字高程模型统计分析的滑坡类型推断
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 19;14(1):14130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65026-z.
6
Machine learning approaches to debris flow susceptibility analyses in the Yunnan section of the Nujiang River Basin.基于机器学习的怒江流域云南段泥石流易发性分析。
PeerJ. 2024 May 20;12:e17352. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17352. eCollection 2024.
7
Study on landslide susceptibility mapping with different factor screening methods and random forest models.基于不同因子筛选方法和随机森林模型的滑坡易发性区划研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 12;18(10):e0292897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292897. eCollection 2023.
8
SBAS-InSAR based validated landslide susceptibility mapping along the Karakoram Highway: a case study of Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan.基于 SBAS-InSAR 的喀喇昆仑公路沿线滑坡易发性制图:以巴基斯坦吉尔吉特-巴尔蒂斯坦为例。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 27;13(1):3344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30009-z.
9
A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran.基于深度学习的滑坡易发性制图模型研究:以伊朗库尔德斯坦省为例。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 17;22(4):1573. doi: 10.3390/s22041573.
10
Assessment of earthquake-induced landslide inventories and susceptibility maps using slope unit-based logistic regression and geospatial statistics.基于坡度单元的逻辑回归和地理空间统计在地震诱发滑坡清单和易感性图评估中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 29;11(1):21333. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00780-y.
评估先进的随机森林和决策树算法在日本伊豆大岛火山岛降雨诱发滑坡敏感性建模中的应用。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 20;662:332-346. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.221. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
4
Application of fuzzy weight of evidence and data mining techniques in construction of flood susceptibility map of Poyang County, China.模糊证据权重和数据挖掘技术在中国鄱阳县洪水易发性图构建中的应用。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 1;625:575-588. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.256. Epub 2017 Dec 30.
5
Influence of Elevation Data Resolution on Spatial Prediction of Colluvial Soils in a Luvisol Region.海拔数据分辨率对淋溶土地区崩积土空间预测的影响
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):e0165699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165699. eCollection 2016.
6
Optimization of Causative Factors for Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Using Remote Sensing and GIS Data in Parts of Niigata, Japan.利用日本新潟部分地区的遥感和地理信息系统数据优化滑坡易发性评估的影响因素
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 27;10(7):e0133262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133262. eCollection 2015.
7
Gene selection in cancer classification using sparse logistic regression with Bayesian regularization.使用带贝叶斯正则化的稀疏逻辑回归进行癌症分类中的基因选择。
Bioinformatics. 2006 Oct 1;22(19):2348-55. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl386. Epub 2006 Jul 14.
8
Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods.预测误差估计:重采样方法的比较
Bioinformatics. 2005 Aug 1;21(15):3301-7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti499. Epub 2005 May 19.
9
Indian hedgehog: a mechanotransduction mediator in condylar cartilage.印度刺猬蛋白:髁突软骨中的一种机械转导介质
J Dent Res. 2004 May;83(5):434-8. doi: 10.1177/154405910408300516.