• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
THE ROLE OF TURNING POINTS IN ESTABLISHING BASELINE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PEOPLE IN DEVELOPMENTAL AND LIFE-COURSE CRIMINOLOGY.转折点在发展犯罪学和生命历程犯罪学中确定个体间基线差异方面的作用
Criminology. 2018 Feb;56(1):191-224. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12167. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
2
The Criminogenic Influence of Family on Substance Use During Reentry: A Life-Course Perspective on Between Individual Differences and Within Individual Changes.家庭对重新融入社会期间物质使用的犯罪ogenic影响:关于个体间差异和个体内变化的生命历程视角。 (注:“criminogenic”可能是个生造词或拼写有误,推测可能是“criminogenic”,意为“产生犯罪的” ,若如此,更准确译文为:家庭对重新融入社会期间物质使用产生犯罪影响:关于个体间差异和个体内变化的生命历程视角。 )
Justice Q. 2019;36(5):841-869. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2018.1439518. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
3
The Duality of the Peer Effect: The Interplay Between Peer Support and Peer Criminality on Offending and Substance Use During Reentry.同伴效应的双重性:同伴支持与同伴犯罪在重新融入社会期间对犯罪及药物使用的相互作用
Crime Delinq. 2018 Jul;64(8):1094-1116. doi: 10.1177/0011128717740529. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
4
Desistance From Crime Without Reintegration: A Longitudinal Study of the Social Context and Life Course Path to Desistance in a Sample of Adults Convicted of a Sex Crime.无重新融入的犯罪停止:对成年性犯罪罪犯样本中犯罪停止的社会背景和生命历程路径的纵向研究
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2016 Nov;60(15):1791-1812. doi: 10.1177/0306624X16668179. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
5
Participants' Experiences of Sex Offender Treatment: Searching for Desisting Narrative Identities.性犯罪者治疗参与者的经历:寻找停止犯罪的叙事身份。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2025 Aug;69(10-11):1426-1445. doi: 10.1177/0306624X241228231. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
6
Turning points in the life course: current findings and future directions in drug use research.生命历程中的转折点:药物使用研究的当前发现与未来方向
Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2010 Sep;3(3):189-95. doi: 10.2174/1874473711003030189.
7
Assessing the within-person impact of social/behavioral programs, increased supervision, and jail time on polysubstance use during reentry.评估社会/行为项目、加强监管和监禁时间对重新入狱期间多种物质使用的个体内部影响。
Corrections. 2018;3(4):266-287. doi: 10.1080/23774657.2017.1383866. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
8
The reciprocal lagged effects of substance use and recidivism in a prisoner reentry context.在囚犯重新融入社会的背景下,物质使用与累犯之间的相互滞后效应。
Health Justice. 2017 Dec;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40352-017-0053-2. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
9
Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities?技术与环境:对发育障碍者而言是支持性资源还是障碍?
Nurs Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;38(2):331-49. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00053-1.
10
Is Emerging Adulthood Influencing Moffitt's Developmental Taxonomy? Adding the "Prolonged" Adolescent Offender.新兴成年期是否影响莫菲特的发展分类法?加入“延长型”青少年罪犯。
West Crim Rev. 2012 Apr 1;13(1):1-15.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-equity as a trustworthiness measure: The relationship among self-equity and security clearance eligibility adjudications in US Army recruits.作为一种可信度衡量标准的自我公平感:美国陆军新兵中自我公平感与安全许可资格判定之间的关系。
Mil Psychol. 2021 Sep 24;33(5):277-295. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2021.1960749. eCollection 2021.
2
The role of substance use in the lives of incarcerated older adults: A qualitative study.物质使用在被监禁老年人生活中的作用:一项定性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 13;14:1116654. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1116654. eCollection 2023.
3
Food insecurity and men's perpetration of partner violence in a longitudinal cohort in South Africa.南非一个纵向队列研究中的粮食不安全与男性对伴侣的暴力行为
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2022 Feb 7;5(1):36-43. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000288. eCollection 2022.
4
The Effect of School Discipline on Offending across Time.学校纪律对不同时期犯罪行为的影响。
Justice Q. 2020;37(4):739-760. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2019.1625428. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
5
Examining the Parole Officer as a Mechanism of Social Support During Reentry From Prison.审视假释官在囚犯出狱后重新融入社会过程中作为社会支持机制的作用。
Crime Delinq. 2020 Jun;66(6-7):1023-1051. doi: 10.1177/0011128719881599. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
6
Deviant Peer Preferences: A Simplified Approach to Account for Peer Selection Effects.异常同伴偏好:一种考虑同伴选择效应的简化方法。
Deviant Behav. 2020;41(9):1143-1156. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2019.1597321. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
7
Family Matters: Moving Beyond "If" Family Support Matters to "Why" Family Support Matters during Reentry from Prison.家庭问题:从关注“家庭支持是否重要”转向探究“为何家庭支持在刑满释放后很重要”。
J Res Crime Delinq. 2019 Jul;56(4):483-523. doi: 10.1177/0022427818820902. Epub 2018 Dec 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Stress and Hardship after Prison.出狱后的压力与困境
AJS. 2015 Mar;120(5):1512-47. doi: 10.1086/681301.
2
Examining the Role of Familial Support During Prison and After Release on Post-Incarceration Mental Health.考察家庭支持在监禁期间及出狱后对刑满释放后心理健康的作用。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2016 Jan;60(1):3-20. doi: 10.1177/0306624X14548023. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
3
The impact of prison reentry services on short-term outcomes: evidence from a multisite evaluation.重返监狱服务对短期结果的影响:来自多地点评估的证据。
Eval Rev. 2013 Jun-Aug;37(3-4):274-313. doi: 10.1177/0193841X13519105. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
4
Prevalence and patterns of polysubstance use in a nationally representative sample of 10th graders in the United States.美国 10 年级全国代表性样本中多种物质使用的流行率和模式。
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Jun;52(6):716-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.12.006. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
5
Investigating friendship quality: an exploration of self-control and social control theories' friendship hypotheses.探究友谊质量:对自我控制和社会控制理论的友谊假设的探索。
J Youth Adolesc. 2012 Nov;41(11):1526-40. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9747-x. Epub 2012 Feb 26.
6
Prison to society: a mixed methods analysis of coping with reentry.从监狱到社会:应对重新融入社会的混合方法分析
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2011 Feb;55(1):136-54. doi: 10.1177/0306624X09350212. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
7
Successful reentry: what differentiates successful and unsuccessful parolees?成功重新融入社会:成功与失败的假释人员有何差异?
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2010 Oct;54(5):667-92. doi: 10.1177/0306624X09342435. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
8
Cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation for high-risk violent offenders: an outcome evaluation of the violence prevention unit.针对高危暴力罪犯的认知行为康复治疗:暴力预防单元的结果评估
J Interpers Violence. 2005 Dec;20(12):1611-27. doi: 10.1177/0886260505280507.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Customary Drinking and Drug Use Record (CDDR): a measure of adolescent alcohol and drug involvement.习惯性饮酒和药物使用记录(CDDR)的心理测量评估:一种衡量青少年酒精和药物使用情况的方法。
J Stud Alcohol. 1998 Jul;59(4):427-38. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1998.59.427.
10
Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy.青春期有限型和终生持续型反社会行为:一种发展分类法。
Psychol Rev. 1993 Oct;100(4):674-701.

转折点在发展犯罪学和生命历程犯罪学中确定个体间基线差异方面的作用

THE ROLE OF TURNING POINTS IN ESTABLISHING BASELINE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PEOPLE IN DEVELOPMENTAL AND LIFE-COURSE CRIMINOLOGY.

作者信息

Boman John H, Mowen Thomas J

机构信息

Bowling Green State University.

出版信息

Criminology. 2018 Feb;56(1):191-224. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12167. Epub 2017 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1111/1745-9125.12167
PMID:31447488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6707535/
Abstract

Turning points, between-person differences, and within-person changes have all been linked to desistance from crime. Nevertheless, the means through which between- person differences are frequently captured in life-course criminology makes them intertwined with, and perhaps confounded by, turning points in life. We propose that a new way of capturing the between-person effect-the baseline between-person difference-could benefit theoretically informed tests of developmental and life-course issues in criminology. Because they occur at one time point immediately preceding a turning point in life, we demonstrate that baseline between-person differences establish meaningful theoretical connections to behavior and the way people change over time. By using panel data from the Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative, we estimate models capturing within-person change and baseline between-person differences in social bonds (family support) and differential association (peer criminality) at the time of release from prison. The results demonstrate that baseline levels of family support protect people from postrelease substance use but not from crime. Baseline between- person differences and within-person changes in peer criminality, however, are robustly related to crime and substance use. Collectively, baseline between-person differences seem critical for behavior and within-person change over time, and the results carry implications for reentry-based policy as well as for theory testing in developmental criminology more broadly.

摘要

转折点、个体间差异以及个体内部变化都与犯罪停止相关联。然而,在生命历程犯罪学中,捕捉个体间差异的常用方法使其与人生转折点相互交织,甚至可能被其混淆。我们提出,一种捕捉个体间效应的新方法——基线个体间差异——可能有益于对犯罪学中发展和生命历程问题进行理论指导的检验。由于它们出现在人生转折点之前的一个时间点,我们证明基线个体间差异与行为以及人们随时间的变化方式建立了有意义的理论联系。通过使用来自严重暴力罪犯重新融入计划的面板数据,我们估计了捕捉个体内部变化以及出狱时社会纽带(家庭支持)和差异交往(同伴犯罪行为)的基线个体间差异的模型。结果表明,家庭支持的基线水平能保护人们出狱后不沾染毒品,但不能防止犯罪。然而,同伴犯罪行为的基线个体间差异和个体内部变化与犯罪及毒品使用密切相关。总体而言,基线个体间差异似乎对行为和个体随时间的变化至关重要,这些结果对基于重新融入的政策以及更广泛的发展犯罪学理论检验都有启示意义。