Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Division of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, P.R. China.
Br J Radiol. 2019 Oct;92(1102):20190271. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190271. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
Radiomics pipelines have been developed to extract novel information from radiological images, which may help in phenotypic profiling of tumours that would correlate to prognosis. Here, we compared two publicly available pipelines for radiomics analyses on head and neck CT and MRI in nasopharynx cancer (NPC).
100 biopsy-proven NPC cases stratified by T- and N-categories were enrolled in this study. Two radiomics pipeline, Moddicom (v. 0.51) and Pyradiomics (v. 2.1.2) were used to extract radiomics features of CT and MRI. Segmentation of primary gross tumour volume was performed using Velocity v. 4.0 by consensus agreement between three radiation oncologists. Intraclass correlation between common features of the two pipelines was analysed by Spearman's rank correlation. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was used to determine association between radiomics features and clinical parameters.
We observed a high proportion of correlated features in the CT data set, but not for MRI; 76.1% (51 of 67 common between Moddicom and Pyradiomics) of CT features and 28.6% (20 of 70 common) of MRI features were significantly correlated. Of these, 100% were shape-related for both CT and MRI, 100 and 23.5% were first-order-related, 61.9 and 19.0% were texture-related, respectively. This interpipeline heterogeneity affected the downstream clustering with known prognostic clinical parameters of cTN-status and GTVp. Nonetheless, shape features were the most reproducible predictors of clinical parameters among the different radiomics modules.
Here, we highlighted significant heterogeneity between two publicly available radiomics pipelines that could affect the downstream association with prognostic clinical factors in NPC.
The present study emphasized the broader importance of selecting stable radiomics features for disease phenotyping, and it is necessary prior to any investigation of multicentre imaging datasets to validate the stability of CT-related radiomics features for clinical prognostication.
放射组学分析流程已被开发出来,以从放射图像中提取新的信息,这可能有助于对肿瘤进行表型分析,这些分析与预后相关。在此,我们比较了两种公开的头颈 CT 和 MRI 鼻咽癌(NPC)放射组学分析流程。
本研究纳入了 100 例经活检证实的 NPC 病例,按 T 分期和 N 分期分层。使用 Moddicom(v. 0.51)和 Pyradiomics(v. 2.1.2)两种放射组学分析流程提取 CT 和 MRI 的放射组学特征。通过三位放射肿瘤学家的共识协议,使用 Velocity v. 4.0 对原发肿瘤大体体积进行分割。分析两个流程中常见特征的 ICC 采用 Spearman 等级相关。使用无监督层次聚类确定放射组学特征与临床参数之间的关系。
我们观察到 CT 数据集的相关特征比例较高,但 MRI 数据集没有;Moddicom 和 Pyradiomics 之间有 76.1%(51 个)的 CT 特征和 28.6%(70 个)的 MRI 特征是显著相关的。其中,100%为 CT 和 MRI 的形状相关,100%和 23.5%为一阶相关,61.9%和 19.0%为纹理相关。这种流程间的异质性影响了与已知预后临床参数 cTN 状态和 GTVp 的下游聚类。尽管如此,形状特征是不同放射组学模块中预测临床参数最具可重复性的指标。
在此,我们强调了两种公开可用的放射组学分析流程之间存在显著的异质性,这可能会影响 NPC 中与预后临床因素的下游关联。
本研究强调了选择稳定的放射组学特征进行疾病表型分析的重要性,在对多中心成像数据集进行任何研究之前,有必要验证 CT 相关放射组学特征对临床预后的稳定性。