• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于3D匹配分子对的多样化基准用于验证评分函数。

A Diverse Benchmark Based on 3D Matched Molecular Pairs for Validating Scoring Functions.

作者信息

Kalinowsky Lena, Weber Julia, Balasupramaniam Shantheya, Baumann Knut, Proschak Ewgenij

机构信息

Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue Str. 9, Frankfurt am Main D-60438, Germany.

Institute of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Technology of Braunschweig, Beethovenstr. 55, Braunschweig D-38106, Germany.

出版信息

ACS Omega. 2018 May 28;3(5):5704-5714. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01194. eCollection 2018 May 31.

DOI:10.1021/acsomega.7b01194
PMID:31458770
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6641919/
Abstract

The prediction of protein-ligand interactions and their corresponding binding free energy is a challenging task in structure-based drug design and related applications. Docking and scoring is broadly used to propose the binding mode and underlying interactions as well as to provide a measure for ligand affinity or differentiate between active and inactive ligands. Various studies have revealed that most docking software packages reliably predict the binding mode, although scoring remains a challenge. Here, a diverse benchmark data set of 99 matched molecular pairs (3D-MMPs) with experimentally determined X-ray structures and corresponding binding affinities is introduced. This data set was used to study the predictive power of 13 commonly used scoring functions to demonstrate the applicability of the 3D-MMP data set as a valuable tool for benchmarking scoring functions.

摘要

在基于结构的药物设计及相关应用中,预测蛋白质 - 配体相互作用及其相应的结合自由能是一项具有挑战性的任务。对接和打分被广泛用于提出结合模式和潜在相互作用,以及提供配体亲和力的度量或区分活性和非活性配体。各种研究表明,尽管打分仍然是一个挑战,但大多数对接软件包能够可靠地预测结合模式。在此,引入了一个包含99个匹配分子对(3D - MMPs)的多样化基准数据集,这些分子对具有实验测定的X射线结构和相应的结合亲和力。该数据集用于研究13种常用打分函数的预测能力,以证明3D - MMP数据集作为打分函数基准测试的有价值工具的适用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/6641919/f4ca4f33b0de/ao-2017-01194k_0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/6641919/afce13dc76cb/ao-2017-01194k_0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/6641919/ff078d5683ba/ao-2017-01194k_0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/6641919/84c19bec00f4/ao-2017-01194k_0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/6641919/50faf9d8b367/ao-2017-01194k_0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/6641919/f4ca4f33b0de/ao-2017-01194k_0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/6641919/afce13dc76cb/ao-2017-01194k_0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/6641919/ff078d5683ba/ao-2017-01194k_0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/6641919/84c19bec00f4/ao-2017-01194k_0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/6641919/50faf9d8b367/ao-2017-01194k_0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/6641919/f4ca4f33b0de/ao-2017-01194k_0002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Diverse Benchmark Based on 3D Matched Molecular Pairs for Validating Scoring Functions.基于3D匹配分子对的多样化基准用于验证评分函数。
ACS Omega. 2018 May 28;3(5):5704-5714. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01194. eCollection 2018 May 31.
2
Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.更新后的基准上评分函数的比较评估:2. 评估方法与总体结果。
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Jun 23;54(6):1717-36. doi: 10.1021/ci500081m. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
3
Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.用于预测配体结合构象和亲和力以及进行筛选富集的任务特定评分函数。
J Chem Inf Model. 2018 Jan 22;58(1):119-133. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00309. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
4
Docking and Scoring with Target-Specific Pose Classifier Succeeds in Native-Like Pose Identification But Not Binding Affinity Prediction in the CSAR 2014 Benchmark Exercise. docking 和 scoring 与目标特定的 pose 分类器相结合,成功地实现了类似天然构象的 pose 识别,但在 CSAR 2014 基准测试中不能预测结合亲和力。
J Chem Inf Model. 2016 Jun 27;56(6):1032-41. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00751. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
5
Enhance the performance of current scoring functions with the aid of 3D protein-ligand interaction fingerprints.借助三维蛋白质-配体相互作用指纹图谱提高当前评分函数的性能。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1750-5.
6
An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.使用包含800个蛋白质-配体复合物的PDBbind精制集对14种评分函数进行的广泛测试。
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004 Nov-Dec;44(6):2114-25. doi: 10.1021/ci049733j.
7
Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.用于精确配体对接和排序的增强神经网络评分函数。
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2018 Apr;16(2):1850004. doi: 10.1142/S021972001850004X. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
8
Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.基于相似性的配体对接和结合亲和力预测的非线性评分函数。
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Nov 25;53(11):3097-112. doi: 10.1021/ci400510e. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
9
Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?奥卡姆剃刀下对接构象的重评分:是否存在更简单的解决方案?
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2018 Sep;32(9):877-888. doi: 10.1007/s10822-018-0155-5. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
10
Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.在多样化测试集上对评分函数的比较评估。
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Apr;49(4):1079-93. doi: 10.1021/ci9000053.

引用本文的文献

1
Pairwise Performance Comparison of Docking Scoring Functions: Computational Approach Using InterCriteria Analysis.对接评分函数的成对性能比较:使用交叉准则分析的计算方法
Molecules. 2025 Jun 27;30(13):2777. doi: 10.3390/molecules30132777.
2
Naringenin Decreases Retroperitoneal Adiposity and Improves Metabolic Parameters in a Rat Model of Western Diet-Induced Obesity.柚皮素可减少西方饮食诱导的肥胖大鼠模型的腹膜后脂肪堆积并改善代谢参数。
Metabolites. 2025 Feb 8;15(2):109. doi: 10.3390/metabo15020109.
3
Computational and Experimental Drug Repurposing of FDA-Approved Compounds Targeting the Cannabinoid Receptor CB1.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating Electron Density Support for Individual Atoms and Molecular Fragments in X-ray Structures.估计X射线结构中单个原子和分子片段的电子密度支持
J Chem Inf Model. 2017 Oct 23;57(10):2437-2447. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00391. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
2
High-Quality Dataset of Protein-Bound Ligand Conformations and Its Application to Benchmarking Conformer Ensemble Generators.高质量的蛋白质结合配体构象数据集及其在构象混合生成器基准测试中的应用。
J Chem Inf Model. 2017 Mar 27;57(3):529-539. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00613. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
3
Improving scoring-docking-screening powers of protein-ligand scoring functions using random forest.
针对大麻素受体CB1的FDA批准化合物的计算和实验性药物重新利用
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Dec 2;16(12):1678. doi: 10.3390/ph16121678.
4
Comparative Anticancer Potentials of Taxifolin and Quercetin Methylated Derivatives against HCT-116 Cell Lines: Effects of -Methylation on Taxifolin and Quercetin as Preliminary Natural Leads.紫杉叶素和槲皮素甲基化衍生物对HCT-116细胞系的抗癌潜力比较:甲基化对紫杉叶素和槲皮素作为初步天然先导物的影响
ACS Omega. 2022 Dec 7;7(50):46629-46639. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05565. eCollection 2022 Dec 20.
5
Synthesis of 6-Halo-Substituted Pericosine A and an Evaluation of Their Antitumor and Antiglycosidase Activities.6-卤代披麻烷 A 的合成及其抗肿瘤和糖苷酶抑制活性评价。
Mar Drugs. 2022 Jun 30;20(7):438. doi: 10.3390/md20070438.
6
identification and study of potential anti-mosquito juvenile hormone binding protein (MJHBP) compounds as candidates for dengue virus - Vector insecticides.鉴定和研究潜在的抗蚊虫保幼激素结合蛋白(MJHBP)化合物,作为登革热病毒载体杀虫剂的候选物。
Biochem Biophys Rep. 2021 Nov 30;28:101178. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.101178. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Syntheses and Glycosidase Inhibitory Activities, and in Silico Docking Studies of Pericosine E Analogs Methoxy-Substituted at C6.佩里考辛 E 的类似物的合成及糖苷酶抑制活性研究,以及 C6 位甲氧基取代的计算机对接研究。
Mar Drugs. 2020 Apr 20;18(4):221. doi: 10.3390/md18040221.
利用随机森林提高蛋白质-配体评分函数的评分-对接-筛选能力
J Comput Chem. 2017 Jan 30;38(3):169-177. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24667. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
4
Improving AutoDock Vina Using Random Forest: The Growing Accuracy of Binding Affinity Prediction by the Effective Exploitation of Larger Data Sets.使用随机森林改进AutoDock Vina:通过有效利用更大数据集提高结合亲和力预测的准确性。
Mol Inform. 2015 Feb;34(2-3):115-26. doi: 10.1002/minf.201400132. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
5
Substituting random forest for multiple linear regression improves binding affinity prediction of scoring functions: Cyscore as a case study.随机森林替代多元线性回归可提高评分函数结合亲和力预测的准确性:以 Cyscore 为例。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 27;15(1):291. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-291.
6
Scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions: a critical perspective.蛋白质-配体相互作用的评分函数:批判性视角
Drug Discov Today Technol. 2004 Dec;1(3):231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.08.004.
7
Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 1. Compilation of the test set.在更新后的基准上对评分函数的比较评估:1. 测试集的编制。
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Jun 23;54(6):1700-16. doi: 10.1021/ci500080q. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
8
Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.更新后的基准上评分函数的比较评估:2. 评估方法与总体结果。
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Jun 23;54(6):1717-36. doi: 10.1021/ci500081m. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
9
SFCscore(RF): a random forest-based scoring function for improved affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.SFCscore(RF):一种基于随机森林的打分函数,可提高蛋白-配体复合物亲和力预测的准确性。
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Aug 26;53(8):1923-33. doi: 10.1021/ci400120b. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
10
Comparability of mixed IC₅₀ data - a statistical analysis.混合 IC₅₀ 数据的可比性——统计分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 16;8(4):e61007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061007. Print 2013.