Gonzalez Gomez Azucena, Syed Saifuddin, Marshall Kenji, Hosseinidoust Zeinab
Department of Chemical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L9S 8L7, Canada.
Michael DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L98 4L8, Canada.
ACS Omega. 2019 Jun 21;4(6):10866-10876. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00825. eCollection 2019 Jun 30.
Liposomes are attractive vehicles for localized delivery of antibiotics. There exists, however, a gap in knowledge when it comes to achieving high liposomal loading efficiencies for antibiotics. To address this issue, we investigated three antibiotics of clinical relevance against staphylococcal infections with different hydrophilicity and chemical structure, namely, vancomycin hydrochloride, teicoplanin, and rifampin. We categorized the suitability of different encapsulation techniques on the basis of encapsulation efficiency, lipid requirement (important for avoiding lipid toxicity), and mass yield (percentage of mass retained during the preparation process). The moderately hydrophobic (teicoplanin) and highly hydrophobic (rifampin) antibiotics varied significantly in their encapsulation load (max 23.4 and 15.5%, respectively) and mass yield (max 74.1 and 71.8%, respectively), favoring techniques that maximized partition between the aqueous core and the lipid bilayer or those that produce oligolamellar vesicles, whereas vancomycin hydrochloride, a highly hydrophilic molecule, showed little preference to any of the protocols. In addition, we report significant bias introduced by the choice of analytical method adopted to quantify the encapsulation efficiency (underestimation of up to 24% or overestimation by up to 57.9% for vancomycin and underestimation of up to 61.1% for rifampin) and further propose ultrafiltration and bursting by methanol as the method with minimal bias for quantification of encapsulation efficiency in liposomes. The knowledge generated in this work provides critical insight into the more practical, albeit less investigated, aspects of designing vesicles for localized antibiotic delivery and can be extended to other nanovehicles that may suffer from the same biases in analytical protocols.
脂质体是用于局部递送抗生素的理想载体。然而,在实现抗生素的高脂质体负载效率方面,存在知识空白。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了三种与临床相关的抗葡萄球菌感染的抗生素,它们具有不同的亲水性和化学结构,即盐酸万古霉素、替考拉宁和利福平。我们根据包封效率、脂质需求(对于避免脂质毒性很重要)和质量产率(制备过程中保留的质量百分比)对不同包封技术的适用性进行了分类。中度疏水的(替考拉宁)和高度疏水的(利福平)抗生素在包封负载(分别最大为23.4%和15.5%)和质量产率(分别最大为74.1%和71.8%)方面有显著差异,有利于使水相核心和脂质双层之间分配最大化的技术或产生寡层囊泡的技术,而高度亲水的分子盐酸万古霉素对任何方案都没有明显偏好。此外,我们报告了用于量化包封效率的分析方法选择所引入的显著偏差(对于万古霉素,低估高达24%或高估高达57.9%,对于利福平,低估高达61.1%),并进一步提出超滤和甲醇破裂作为对脂质体包封效率进行量化时偏差最小的方法。这项工作中产生的知识为设计用于局部抗生素递送的囊泡的更实际但较少研究的方面提供了关键见解,并且可以扩展到其他可能在分析方案中存在相同偏差的纳米载体。