Department of Sociology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 2J4, Canada.
Department of Sociology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
Demography. 2019 Oct;56(5):1975-2004. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00801-6.
For more than a century, researchers from a wide range of disciplines have sought to estimate the unique contributions of age, period, and cohort (APC) effects on a variety of outcomes. A key obstacle to these efforts is the linear dependence among the three time scales. Various methods have been proposed to address this issue, but they have suffered from either ad hoc assumptions or extreme sensitivity to small differences in model specification. After briefly reviewing past work, we outline a new approach for identifying temporal effects in population-level data. Fundamental to our framework is the recognition that it is only the slopes of an APC model that are unidentified, not the nonlinearities or particular combinations of the linear effects. One can thus use constraints implied by the data along with explicit theoretical claims to bound one or more of the APC effects. Bounds on these parameters may be nearly as informative as point estimates, even with relatively weak assumptions. To demonstrate the usefulness of our approach, we examine temporal effects in prostate cancer incidence and homicide rates. We conclude with a discussion of guidelines for further research on APC effects.
一个多世纪以来,来自广泛学科的研究人员一直试图估计年龄、时期和队列(APC)效应对各种结果的独特贡献。这些努力的一个关键障碍是三个时间尺度之间的线性相关性。已经提出了各种方法来解决这个问题,但它们要么受到特定假设的限制,要么对模型规范的微小差异非常敏感。在简要回顾过去的工作后,我们概述了一种在人群水平数据中识别时间效应的新方法。我们框架的基础是认识到只有 APC 模型的斜率是未识别的,而不是非线性或线性效应的特定组合。因此,可以利用数据中隐含的约束以及明确的理论主张来限制一个或多个 APC 效应。这些参数的约束即使在假设较弱的情况下,也可能与点估计一样有信息量。为了展示我们方法的有用性,我们研究了前列腺癌发病率和凶杀率的时间效应。最后,我们讨论了 APC 效应进一步研究的指导方针。