Anglia Ruskin University, Faculty of Life Sciences, UK.
LASA, UK.
Lab Anim. 2019 Dec;53(6):541-563. doi: 10.1177/0023677219864626. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
Cephalopods are the first invertebrate class regulated by the European Union (EU) under Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, which requires prospective assessment of severity of procedures. To assist the scientific community in establishing severity classification for cephalopods, we undertook a web-based survey of the EU cephalopod research community as represented by the participants in the European COoperation on Science and Technology (COST) Action FA1301, CephsAction'. The survey consisted of 50 scenarios covering a range of procedures involving several cephalopod species at different life stages. Respondents (59 people from 15 countries) either allocated a severity classification to each scenario or indicated that they were unable to decide (UTD). Analyses evaluated score distributions and clustering. Overall, the UTD scores were low (7.0 ± 0.6%) and did not affect the severity classification. Procedures involving paralarvae and killing methods (not specified in Annexe IV) had the highest UTD scores. Consensus on non-recovery procedures was reached consistently, although occasionally non-recovery appeared to be confused with killing methods. Scenarios describing procedures above the lower threshold for regulation, including those describing behavioural studies, were also identified and allocated throughout the full range of severity classifications. Severity classification for scenarios based on different species (e.g. cuttlefish vs. octopus) was consistent, comparable and dependent on potentially more harmful interventions. We found no marked or statistically significant differences in the overall scoring of scenarios between the demographic subgroups (age, sex, PhD and cephalopod experience). The COST Action FA1301 survey data provide a basis for a prospective severity classification for cephalopods to serve as guide for researchers, project assessors and regulators.
头足类动物是欧盟(EU)根据关于保护用于科学目的的动物的第 2010/63/EU 指令监管的第一个无脊椎动物纲,该指令要求对程序的严重程度进行前瞻性评估。为了协助科学界对头足类动物的严重程度分类进行建立,我们针对欧洲合作科学和技术(COST)行动 FA1301 的参与者(代表欧盟头足类研究界),进行了一项基于网络的调查,即 CephsAction。该调查由 50 个方案组成,涵盖了涉及不同生命阶段的几种头足类动物的一系列程序。答复者(来自 15 个国家的 59 人)要么为每个方案分配一个严重程度分类,要么表示他们无法决定(UTD)。分析评估了得分分布和聚类。总体而言,UTD 得分较低(7.0±0.6%),不会影响严重程度分类。涉及幼体和杀伤方法的程序(未在附件四规定)的 UTD 得分最高。尽管有时非恢复似乎与杀伤方法混淆,但对非恢复程序的共识始终达成一致。还确定并分配了描述高于监管下限的程序的方案,包括描述行为研究的方案,并将其分配到严重程度分类的整个范围内。基于不同物种(例如乌贼与章鱼)的方案的严重程度分类是一致的、可比的,并且取决于潜在的更有害的干预措施。我们没有发现方案评分在年龄、性别、博士学位和头足类动物经验等人口统计学子组之间存在明显或统计学上的显著差异。COST 行动 FA1301 调查数据为头足类动物的前瞻性严重程度分类提供了依据,可为研究人员、项目评估员和监管机构提供指导。