Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Nov 1;124(9):1406-1412. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.046. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
Whether patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and thyroid disease are clinically distinct from those with AF and no thyroid disease is unknown. Furthermore, the effectiveness of anticoagulation for prevention of AF-related thromboembolic events in patients with thyroid disease has not been adequately studied. Patients enrolled in the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation, which compared apixaban with warfarin in patients with AF (n = 18,201), were categorized by thyroid disease history at randomization (hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and no thyroid disease). Adjusted hazard ratios derived from Cox models were used to compare outcomes by thyroid disease history. Associations between randomized treatment and outcomes by thyroid disease history were examined using Cox models with interaction terms. A total of 18,021/18,201 (99%) patients had available thyroid disease history at randomization: 1,656 (9%) had hypothyroidism, 321 (2%) had hyperthyroidism, and 16,044 (89%) had no thyroid disease. When compared with those without a history of thyroid disease, patients with hypo- or hyperthyroidism were more likely to be female (60.4% vs 32.1%; 52.0% vs 32.1%; both p <0.0001). Patients with hypothyroidism were older (73 vs 70 years, p <0.0001) and more likely to have had previous falls (8.7% vs 4.3%, p <0.0001). There was no difference in clinical outcomes by thyroid disease history. The benefit of apixaban compared with warfarin was similar regardless of thyroid disease history (interaction p >0.10). In conclusion, despite differences in baseline characteristics of patients with and without thyroid disease, their clinical outcomes were similar. The benefit of apixban compared with warfarin was preserved regardless of thyroid disease history.
是否患有心房颤动 (AF) 和甲状腺疾病的患者与没有甲状腺疾病的 AF 患者在临床上存在显著差异尚不清楚。此外,对于甲状腺疾病患者,抗凝治疗预防 AF 相关血栓栓塞事件的有效性尚未得到充分研究。在比较阿哌沙班与华法林用于 AF 患者的(APIXaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation,ARISTOTLE)研究中,将患有 AF 的患者按随机分组时的甲状腺疾病史(甲状腺功能减退症、甲状腺功能亢进症和无甲状腺疾病)进行分类。采用 Cox 模型得出的调整后的危险比用于比较甲状腺疾病史的结果。采用 Cox 模型并带有交互项,研究随机治疗与甲状腺疾病史之间的关联。在随机分组时,共有 18201 例患者(18021/18201,99%)的甲状腺疾病史可用:1656 例(9%)患有甲状腺功能减退症,321 例(2%)患有甲状腺功能亢进症,16044 例(89%)无甲状腺疾病。与无甲状腺疾病史的患者相比,患有甲状腺功能减退症或甲状腺功能亢进症的患者更可能为女性(60.4% vs. 32.1%;52.0% vs. 32.1%;均 p <0.0001)。甲状腺功能减退症患者年龄更大(73 岁 vs. 70 岁,p <0.0001),更有可能有过跌倒史(8.7% vs. 4.3%,p <0.0001)。甲状腺疾病史不同,临床结局无差异。与华法林相比,阿哌沙班的获益情况相似,无论甲状腺疾病史如何(交互作用 p >0.10)。总之,尽管有甲状腺疾病和无甲状腺疾病患者的基线特征存在差异,但他们的临床结局相似。与华法林相比,阿哌沙班的获益在有或无甲状腺疾病史的患者中均得到保留。