Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Crta San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, 03690, San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain.
Department of Ophthalmology, Vithas Medimar International Hospital, Alicante, Spain.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;257(11):2437-2447. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04453-5. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
To evaluate the intrasession repeatability of anterior corneal topographic and aberrometric measurements provided by a color-LED topographer as well as their interchangeability with those provided by a Scheimpflug-based system in healthy eyes.
Thirty-five healthy eyes of 35 patients (age, 16-66 years) were enrolled. A complete eye examination was performed in all cases including a complete corneal analysis with the Scheimpflug-based system Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte) (one measurement) and the Cassini system (i-Optics) (three consecutive measurements). Intrasession repeatability of the Cassini measurements was assessed with the within-subject standard deviation (S) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate the agreement between both devices.
Mean S for keratometric readings was 0.02 mm (ICC ≥ 0.992), ranging between 0.16 and 0.05 D (ICC 0.930-0.978) for anterior and total astigmatic measurements. Mean S for asphericity and corneal diameter were 0.06 (ICC 0.926) and 0.03 mm (IC 0.997), respectively. Aberrometric parameters showed ICCs ≥ 0.816, except for Z (ICC 0.741) and Z (ICC 0.544). When comparing devices, statistically significant differences were found for most of topographic and aberrometric data (p ≤ 0.044). Likewise, ranges of agreement between devices were clinically relevant (keratometry > 0.06 mm; total astigmatic components > 0.69 D; asphericity 0.35; second-, third-, and fourth-order Zernike terms, more than 0.20, 0.13, and 0.01 μm, respectively).
Consistent anterior corneal topographic, total corneal astigmatic, and aberrometric measurements are obtained with color-LED topography in healthy eyes, which are not interchangeable with those provided by the Scheimpflug-based topography.
评估彩色 LED 角膜地形仪提供的前角膜地形和像差测量的日内重复性,以及在健康眼中与基于 Scheimpflug 的系统提供的这些测量的可互换性。
纳入 35 名患者(年龄 16-66 岁)的 35 只健康眼。所有病例均行全面眼部检查,包括基于 Scheimpflug 的 Pentacam(Oculus Optikgeräte)系统(单次测量)和 Cassini 系统(i-Optics)(连续三次测量)的完整角膜分析。用组内标准差(S)和组内相关系数(ICC)评估 Cassini 测量的日内重复性。 Bland-Altman 分析用于评估两种设备之间的一致性。
角膜曲率读数的平均 S 为 0.02mm(ICC≥0.992),前向和总散光测量的范围为 0.16 至 0.05D(ICC 0.930-0.978)。非球面和角膜直径的平均 S 分别为 0.06(ICC 0.926)和 0.03mm(IC 0.997)。像差参数的 ICC 均≥0.816,除 Z(ICC 0.741)和 Z(ICC 0.544)外。当比较两种设备时,大多数地形和像差数据的差异均有统计学意义(p≤0.044)。同样,两种设备之间的一致性范围具有临床意义(角膜曲率>0.06mm;总散光成分>0.69D;非球面度 0.35;第二、第三和第四阶 Zernike 项,分别超过 0.20、0.13 和 0.01μm)。
在健康眼中,彩色 LED 地形仪可获得一致的前角膜地形、总角膜散光和像差测量值,与基于 Scheimpflug 的地形仪提供的测量值不可互换。