• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与式妇女小组如何以及为何能提高孕产妇和儿童健康(MCH)护理的质量?系统评价方案。

How and why do participatory women's groups (PWGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? A systematic review protocol.

机构信息

School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

College of Medicine and Dentistry and Anton Breinl Research Centre for Health Systems Strengthening, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 5;9(9):e030461. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030461.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030461
PMID:31492787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6731784/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Community-based Participatory Women's Groups (PWGs) have proven to be an effective intervention to improve maternal and child health (MCH) outcomes in low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Less is known about how PWGs exert their effects in LMICs and virtually nothing is known about the contextual issues, processes and power relationships that affect PWG outcomes in high resource settings. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise and critically analyse the current evidence on how and why PWGs improve the quality of MCH care. We aim to demonstrate how PWGs function and why PWG interventions contribute to social and health outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The protocol will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. The databases Medline (Ovid): Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (Ebsco); Informit health suite Scopus, Australian HealthInfoNet, the Cochrane Library and other sources will be searched under broad categories: intervention, context and outcomes to 30 June 2019.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As only secondary data will be analysed; ethical approval is not required. The review will be disseminated to relevant organisations and presented in peer-reviewed papers and at conferences. This will be the first attempt to summarise the current available evidence on the characteristics, contextual influences and mechanisms that are associated with the outcomes and effectiveness of PWGs.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019126533.

摘要

简介

基于社区的妇女团体(PWGs)已被证明是改善中低收入国家(LMICs)母婴健康(MCH)结局的有效干预措施。关于 PWGs 在 LMICs 中如何发挥作用的了解较少,而在高资源环境中影响 PWGs 结果的背景问题、过程和权力关系几乎一无所知。本系统评价的目的是综合和批判性分析目前关于 PWGs 如何以及为何改善母婴保健质量的证据。我们旨在展示 PWGs 的运作方式以及为什么 PWG 干预措施有助于社会和健康结果。

方法和分析

该方案将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。数据库 Medline(Ovid):护理和联合健康文献累积索引(Ebsco);Informit 健康套件 Scopus、澳大利亚健康信息网、Cochrane 图书馆和其他来源将根据广泛的类别进行搜索:干预、背景和结果至 2019 年 6 月 30 日。

伦理和传播

由于仅分析二次数据,因此不需要伦理批准。该审查将分发给相关组织,并在同行评议的论文和会议上发表。这将是首次尝试总结目前关于 PWGs 的特征、背景影响和与结果和有效性相关的机制的现有证据。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42019126533。

相似文献

1
How and why do participatory women's groups (PWGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? A systematic review protocol.参与式妇女小组如何以及为何能提高孕产妇和儿童健康(MCH)护理的质量?系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 5;9(9):e030461. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030461.
2
How and why do women's groups (WGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? A systematic review of the literature.妇女组织如何以及为何能提高母婴保健(MCH)的质量?文献系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 21;12(2):e055756. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055756.
3
WOmen's Action for Mums and Bubs (WOMB) Trial Protocol: A Non-randomized Stepped Wedge Implementation Trial of Participatory Women's Groups to Improve the Health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mothers and Children in Australia.妇女关爱母婴行动(WOMB)试验方案:一项关于参与式妇女团体的非随机阶梯楔形实施试验,旨在改善澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民母亲及儿童的健康状况。
Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 18;8:73. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00073. eCollection 2020.
4
Private sector delivery of quality care for maternal, newborn and child health in low-income and middle-income countries: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol.私营部门在中低收入国家提供优质孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康护理服务:一项混合方法系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):e033141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033141.
5
Cost of maternal health services in low and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇保健服务的成本:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 20;9(8):e027822. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027822.
6
Effect of pay for performance to improve quality of maternal and child care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.绩效薪酬对改善低收入和中等收入国家母婴保健质量的影响:一项系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 14;16:321. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2982-4.
7
Women's groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.妇女组织开展参与式学习和行动,以改善资源匮乏环境中的孕产妇和新生儿健康:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1736-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60685-6.
8
Voices from low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol of primary healthcare interventions within public health systems addressing intimate partner violence against women.来自低收入和中等收入国家的声音:一项关于公共卫生系统中针对亲密伴侣暴力侵害妇女行为的初级卫生保健干预措施的系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 25;8(3):e019266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019266.
9
Effectiveness of interventions for improving timely diagnosis of breast and cervical cancers in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.干预措施在提高中低收入国家乳腺癌和宫颈癌及时诊断率方面的效果:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):e042788. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042788.
10
Burden, risk factors and outcomes of hyperemesis gravidarum in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs): systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.中低收入国家(LMICs)中妊娠剧吐的负担、风险因素和结局:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 4;9(4):e025841. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025841.

引用本文的文献

1
Belonging: a meta-theme analysis of women's community-making in group antenatal and postnatal care.归属感:对女性在产前和产后小组护理中建立社区的元主题分析。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 26;13:1506956. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1506956. eCollection 2025.
2
Service delivery interventions to improve maternal and newborn health in low- and middle-income countries: scoping review of quality improvement, implementation research and health system strengthening approaches.服务提供干预措施以改善中低收入国家的孕产妇和新生儿健康:质量改进、实施研究和卫生系统强化方法的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):1223. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10202-6.
3
The effects of community-based interventions on the uptake of selected maternal and child health services: experiences of the IMCHA project in Iringa Tanzania, 2015-2020.基于社区的干预措施对特定母婴保健服务利用的影响:坦桑尼亚伊林加地区 IMCHA 项目的经验,2015-2020 年。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 8;23(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05638-x.
4
How and why do women's groups (WGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? A systematic review of the literature.妇女组织如何以及为何能提高母婴保健(MCH)的质量?文献系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 21;12(2):e055756. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055756.
5
The influence of community factors in the implementation of community-based interventions to improve antenatal care: a qualitative study based on the IMCHA programme in Tanzania.社区因素对实施以社区为基础的干预措施以改善产前保健的影响:基于坦桑尼亚 IMCHA 项目的定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2021 Sep 22;18(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01225-5.
6
Effect of a lay counselor-delivered integrated maternal mental health and early childhood development group-based intervention in Northern Ghana: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.加纳北部由非专业顾问提供的孕产妇心理健康与幼儿发展综合小组干预措施的效果:一项整群随机对照试验
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2021 May 26;8:e18. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2021.15. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Community participation in health services development, implementation, and evaluation: A systematic review of empowerment, health, community, and process outcomes.社区参与卫生服务的发展、实施和评估:赋权、健康、社区和过程结果的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 May 10;14(5):e0216112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216112. eCollection 2019.
2
Could Postnatal Women's Groups Be Used to Improve Outcomes for Mothers and Children in High-Income Countries? A Systematic Review.产后妇女团体能否用于改善高收入国家母婴的结局?一项系统综述。
Matern Child Health J. 2018 Dec;22(12):1698-1712. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2606-y.
3
Systematic review of community participation interventions to improve maternal health outcomes in rural South Asia.系统评价社区参与干预措施对改善南亚农村地区孕产妇健康结局的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Aug 10;18(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1964-1.
4
Community participation in general health initiatives in high and upper-middle income countries: A systematic review exploring the nature of participation, use of theories, contextual drivers and power relations in community participation.高收入和中上收入国家一般健康倡议中的社区参与:一项系统评价,探讨社区参与的性质、理论的使用、背景驱动因素和权力关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep;213:106-122. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.019. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
5
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
6
PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews.PICO、PICOS和SPIDER:三种定性系统评价检索工具特异性和敏感性的比较研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 21;14:579. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0.
7
Community engagement to enhance child survival and early development in low- and middle-income countries: an evidence review.社区参与促进低收入和中等收入国家儿童生存与早期发展:证据综述
J Health Commun. 2014;19 Suppl 1(sup1):67-88. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.941519.
8
Trials of participation to improve maternal and newborn health.参与改善孕产妇和新生儿健康的试验。
Lancet. 2013 Aug 24;382(9893):681. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61771-7.
9
Women's groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.妇女组织开展参与式学习和行动,以改善资源匮乏环境中的孕产妇和新生儿健康:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1736-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60685-6.
10
Effects of community participation on improving uptake of skilled care for maternal and newborn health: a systematic review.社区参与对提高母婴健康技能护理利用率的影响:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055012. Epub 2013 Feb 4.