• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床护士的研究培训需求:一项针对中国三级医院的全国性研究。

Research-training needs of clinical nurses: A nationwide study among tertiary hospitals in China.

作者信息

Wu Xue, Wu Xinjuan, Gao Yanhong, Wang Limin, Jin Jingfen, Li Yinglan, Cheng Shouzhen, Wen Xianxiu, Wang Aiping, Li Qingyin, Shang Shaomei

机构信息

Peking University School of Nursing, Beijing, China.

Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Sci. 2019 Jun 1;6(3):300-308. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.05.007. eCollection 2019 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.05.007
PMID:31508451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6722478/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate Chinese tertiary hospital nurses' research output, research ability, and their related training needs regarding scientific research methodology and analyze the relations among them.

METHODS

A nationwide survey was conducted in China on a large sample of tertiary hospital nurses ( = 27,335) recruited from 22 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities. A validated, self-designed questionnaire, consisted of a common questionnaire, the Science Research Skills Self-Rating Questionnaire (SRSQ) and the Scientific Research Training Needs Questionnaire (SRTNQ) were used to assess nurses' research output, self-rated research skills and research-training needs.

RESULTS

The nurses' scientific research participation rates (with 4.13%, 7.85%, 5.35%, and 2.04% in research projects, research attendance, papers published, and patent, respectively) and their self-rated research skills 25.00 (12.50, 37.50) were very low. However, the research training needs were relatively high 53.12(37.50, 75.00). Significant differences in research participation rates (research projects, research attendance, papers published, and patent), scientific research skills, and research-training needs were determined by age, highest education level, nursing experience, employment, technical title, administrative post, and clinical tutoring experience ( < 0.05). Female and male nurses had different research participation rates (only research projects and studies published) and scientific research skills ( < 0.05). Positive correlations were observed among research output, scientific research skills, and research-training needs ( < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses' scientific research participation and self-rated research ability were below the optimal despite that they had relatively high research-training needs. Nurses should be provided further research training with tailored content to their characteristics and capacity.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估中国三级医院护士的科研产出、科研能力及其在科研方法方面的相关培训需求,并分析它们之间的关系。

方法

在中国对来自22个省、自治区和直辖市的大量三级医院护士样本(n = 27335)进行了全国性调查。使用一份经过验证的、自行设计的问卷,包括一份通用问卷、科研技能自评问卷(SRSQ)和科研培训需求问卷(SRTNQ),来评估护士的科研产出、自评科研技能和科研培训需求。

结果

护士的科研参与率(研究项目、参加科研活动、发表论文和专利的参与率分别为4.13%、7.85%、5.35%和2.04%)以及自评科研技能25.00(12.50,37.50)非常低。然而,科研培训需求相对较高53.12(37.50,75.00)。研究参与率(研究项目、参加科研活动、发表论文和专利)、科研技能和科研培训需求在年龄、最高学历、护理经验、就业情况、技术职称、行政职务和临床带教经验方面存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。女性和男性护士的研究参与率(仅研究项目和发表的研究)和科研技能存在差异(P < 0.05)。科研产出、科研技能和科研培训需求之间存在正相关(P < 0.01)。

结论

尽管护士的科研培训需求相对较高,但他们的科研参与度和自评科研能力低于最佳水平。应根据护士的特点和能力为其提供进一步的针对性科研培训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bebe/6722478/0ec45bb6113a/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bebe/6722478/0ec45bb6113a/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bebe/6722478/0ec45bb6113a/figs1.jpg

相似文献

1
Research-training needs of clinical nurses: A nationwide study among tertiary hospitals in China.临床护士的研究培训需求:一项针对中国三级医院的全国性研究。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2019 Jun 1;6(3):300-308. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.05.007. eCollection 2019 Jul 10.
2
Kirkpatrick's evaluation of the effect of a nursing innovation team training for clinical nurses.柯克帕特里克评估护理创新团队培训对临床护士的影响。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Oct;30(7):2165-2175. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13504. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
3
Research Competence in Clinical Nursing Insights From Chinese Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Survey.中国护士临床护理研究能力洞察:一项横断面调查
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jun;81(6):3071-3082. doi: 10.1111/jan.16462. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
4
Research Capacity and Research Training Needs of Clinical Nurses in Suzhou, China.中国苏州临床护士的研究能力与研究培训需求
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2019 Sep 1;50(9):423-432. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20190814-09.
5
Nursing behaviors relevant to pressure injury in the general hospitals of Changsha, China.中国长沙综合医院中与压疮相关的护理行为。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Jun 28;45(6):722-732. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2020.190630.
6
Unmet needs in health training among nurses in rural Chinese township health centers: a cross-sectional hospital-based study.中国农村乡镇卫生院护士健康培训方面的未满足需求:一项基于医院的横断面研究。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017 Oct 4;14:22. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.22. eCollection 2017.
7
Critical care nurses' self-assessed patient observation skills: a cross-sectional survey study.重症监护护士自我评估的患者观察技能:一项横断面调查研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2019 Sep;24(5):268-275. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12412. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
8
Current situation and needs analysis of medical staff first aid ability in China: a cross-sectional study.中国医务人员急救能力的现状和需求分析:一项横断面研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 3;23(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00891-x.
9
Investigation of the airway management practice of emergency department ward nurses: a nationwide survey in China.调查中国急诊科病房护士的气道管理实践:全国性调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 17;11(12):e049869. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049869.
10
NURSES' knowledge, skills and personal attributes for providing competent health education practice, and its influencing factors: A cross-sectional study.护士提供胜任的健康教育实践的知识、技能和个人特质及其影响因素:一项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Jan;58:103277. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103277. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to building research capacity among clinical nurses: A systematic review protocol.临床护士科研能力建设的促进因素与障碍:一项系统评价方案
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 29;20(8):e0331292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331292. eCollection 2025.
2
Augmenting the spirit of research among nursing personnel: A narrative review.增强护理人员的研究精神:一项叙述性综述。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Jan;13(1):10-14. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_77_23. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
3
'Research is the last thing on our minds, we are in crisis': Experiences of Lagos state nurses towards research and scholarly endeavours.

本文引用的文献

1
Registration of randomized controlled trials in nursing journals.护理期刊中随机对照试验的注册情况。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 Jul 16;2:8. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0036-9. eCollection 2017.
2
Transparency in the reporting of nursing research.护理研究报告中的透明度。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(3-4):475-477. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14212. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
3
"Keeping on track"-Hospital nurses' struggles with maintaining workflow while seeking to integrate evidence-based practice into their daily work: A grounded theory study.
“我们根本没有心思做研究,我们正处在危机之中”:拉各斯州护士对研究和学术工作的看法。
Nurs Open. 2023 Oct;10(10):7073-7083. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1967. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
4
English training requirements and associated factors for non-native English-speaking nurses: A critical gap analysis based on the importance-performance method.非英语母语护士的英语培训要求及相关因素:基于重要性-绩效法的关键差距分析
Heliyon. 2023 May 21;9(6):e16481. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16481. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Nursing Research, Dissemination of Knowledge and its Potential Contribution to the Practice.护理研究、知识传播及其对实践的潜在贡献。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2022 Oct;40(3). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v40n3e01.
6
Nurses as Gifted Artists in Caring: An Analysis of Nursing Care Concept.护士作为关怀领域的天才艺术家:护理关怀概念分析
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022 Mar 14;27(2):125-133. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_465_20. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
7
Development of a blended emergent research training program for clinical nurses (part 1).为临床护士开发的混合式新兴研究培训项目(第1部分)。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Jan 4;21(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00786-x.
8
Effectiveness of a nursing innovation workshop at enhancing nurses' innovation abilities: A quasi-experimental study.护理创新工作坊对提高护士创新能力的效果:一项准实验研究。
Nurs Open. 2022 Jan;9(1):418-427. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1080. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
9
Research ability and research motivation of postgraduate nursing students in traditional Chinese medicine colleges.中医学院研究生护理学生的研究能力和研究动机。
Nurs Open. 2022 Jan;9(1):408-417. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1079. Epub 2021 Oct 3.
“保持正轨”-医院护士在努力将循证实践融入日常工作的同时,维持工作流程的挣扎:扎根理论研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jan;77:179-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
4
Developing nursing research in the United Arab Emirates: a narrative review.发展阿拉伯联合酋长国的护理研究:叙事性评论。
Int Nurs Rev. 2018 Mar;65(1):93-101. doi: 10.1111/inr.12405. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
Utilization of registered nurses in primary care teams: A systematic review.基层医疗团队中注册护士的使用:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Sep;74:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 May 20.
6
Research publication performance of Australian Professors of Nursing & Midwifery.澳大利亚护理与助产教授的研究发表情况。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Mar;74(3):495-497. doi: 10.1111/jan.13338. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
7
Nurse Satisfaction With Opportunities to Engage in Research.护士对参与研究机会的满意度。
West J Nurs Res. 2018 Feb;40(2):209-221. doi: 10.1177/0193945916682472. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
8
The Internet of Things for basic nursing care-A scoping review.基础护理中的物联网——一项范围综述
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Apr;69:78-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
9
Health research capacity development in low and middle income countries: reality or rhetoric? A systematic meta-narrative review of the qualitative literature.低收入和中等收入国家的卫生研究能力发展:现实还是空谈?对定性文献的系统元叙事综述
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 27;7(1):e012332. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012332.
10
What factors influence nurses' behavior in supporting patient self-management? An explorative questionnaire study.哪些因素影响护士支持患者自我管理的行为?一项探索性问卷调查研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Nov;63:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.017. Epub 2016 Aug 23.